본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

日本語自発文に関する研究 - 自動詞との連続性の観点から -

A Study on Japanese voluntary statement - From the point of view of the continuity of the intransitive -

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

I have been found that it morphologically represents the spontaneity to be in the [-∮ -, - e -, - ar -, - r-]. In particular, [a] [-∮-] intransitive morpheme is morpheme of the transitive verb that corresponds as unmarked [-as-], this morpheme [-as-] is operated by the nature and spontaneity of the subject it can be said in the establishment to transitive verb it's turning point that represents the meaning of the causative. Therefore, [- ∮-] it was found that even the type of spontaneous verb is semantically represent the typical spontaneity, applicable mainly natural phenomena with [b]. [c], [d] morpheme of intransitive of [-ar -] [- r-], there is a natural phenomenon and if there is nature and spontaneity to realize the situation to the subject, along with the [e], and that voluntary verb thing is I found. as if [f] is an intransitive verb morpheme is [-e-], rather than things had happened by the main actor of a certain someone, is a voluntary meaning that became naturally so. [g] is a mediator as a result by contact with, it is when a situation is achieved, naturally because the situation did not occur, it can be said that the closer to the intransitive than voluntary means. [h] is as if an intransitive verb morpheme is [-re-], morpheme of the corresponding transitive verb [-s-], the situation by the intension and some direct action against the object of the subject has been realized a result, it was found to be a intransitive representing the state of the target. Finally, [i], it was said to be a transit point to migrate to the transitive verb in intransitive as reflexive.

Abstract

I have been found that it morphologically represents the spontaneity to be in the [-∮ -, - e -, - ar -, - r-]. In particular, [a] [-∮-] intransitive morpheme is morpheme of the transitive verb that corresponds as unmarked [-as-], this morpheme [-as-] is operated by the nature and spontaneity of the subject it can be said in the establishment to transitive verb it's turning point that represents the meaning of the causative. Therefore, [- ∮-] it was found that even the type of spontaneous verb is semantically represent the typical spontaneity, applicable mainly natural phenomena with [b]. [c], [d] morpheme of intransitive of [-ar -] [- r-], there is a natural phenomenon and if there is nature and spontaneity to realize the situation to the subject, along with the [e], and that voluntary verb thing is I found. as if [f] is an intransitive verb morpheme is [-e-], rather than things had happened by the main actor of a certain someone, is a voluntary meaning that became naturally so. [g] is a mediator as a result by contact with, it is when a situation is achieved, naturally because the situation did not occur, it can be said that the closer to the intransitive than voluntary means. [h] is as if an intransitive verb morpheme is [-re-], morpheme of the corresponding transitive verb [-s-], the situation by the intension and some direct action against the object of the subject has been realized a result, it was found to be a intransitive representing the state of the target. Finally, [i], it was said to be a transit point to migrate to the transitive verb in intransitive as reflexive.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 権勝林, "自発使役文の分析", 日本言語文化, 1, pp.27~49 (2003)
  2. 尹順德, "自発表現としてのようになる文", 言語科学論集, (8), pp.73~84 (2004)
  3. 이광수, "일본어 자발태의 구조", 일어일문학 연구, 36, pp.95~113 (2000), 한국일어일문학회
  4. 千昊載, "자발문 재고", 日語日文学, 12, pp.79~97 (1999), 大韓日語日文学会
  5. 千昊載, "非?格自動詞使役構文の日韓?照", 일어일문학연구, 46(1), pp.163~186 (2003), 한국일어일문학회
  6. 川崎潔, "国語の自発動詞", 獨協大学教養緒学研究, 4, pp.87~112 (1970)
  7. 影山太郎, "動詞意味論", pp.15~35 (1996), くろしお出版
  8. 影山太郎, "動詞の意味と構文", pp.12~39 (2001), 大修館書店
  9. 小泉保ら, "日本語基本動詞用法辞典" (1989), 大修館書店
  10. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ", pp.271~284 (1982), くろしお出版
  11. 中右実, "中間態と自発態", 日本語学, 10, pp.52~64 (1991)
  12. 仁田義雄, "文の骨格", pp.159~174 (2000), 岩波書店
  13. 早津惠美子, "対応する他動詞のある自動詞の意味的·通語的特徴", 言語学研究, (7), pp.79~93 (1987)
  14. 早津惠美子, "有対他動詞と無対他動詞の違いについて", 動詞の自他󰡕日本語研究資料集, 8(1), pp.179~197 (1995), ひつじ書房
  15. 森山卓郎, "日本語動詞述語文の研究", pp.120~133 (1988), 明治書院
  16. ウェスリ-․M․ヤコブセン, "日本語学の新展開", pp.213~247 (1989), くろしお出版
  17. Cruse、D.A, "Some Thoughts on Agentivity", Journal of Linguistics, 18, pp.11~23 (1973)
  18. Kuroda, S. -Y., "Lexical and Productive Causative in Japanese: an examination of the theory of pragmatic structure", Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 15, pp.1~81 (1993)
  19. Krause、Jurgen, "Untersuchungen uber das verb geschehen: Eine vorstudie zuden verben des geschehens" (1977), Niemeyer
  20. Shibatani、Masayoshi, "Passives and related constructions", Language, 614, pp.821~848 (1985)
  21. W.M..Jacobsen, "The Transitive Structure of Events in Japanese", pp.258~269 (1992), くろしお出版

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (33건)