본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

[파멜라] 혹은 빛의 형식: 순수, 오염 그리고 계몽의 외설적 이면

Pamela, or Form of the Light: Innocence, Contamination, and the Obscene Obverse of the Enlightenment

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

By focusing on obscene stain evoked in Pamela, this paper aims to examine the way in which Pamela impressively embodies the obscenity seeping into the idea of the light in the educational Enlightenment novel. Inspired by Zizek’s notion of obscenity and Jean Starobinski’s concept of transparency and veil, we define the obscene not simply as lustful and salacious sensations or ideas, but as excessive enjoyment that the symbolic stage or form cannot fully represent. Samuel Richardson elevates Pamela’s virginal body as a symbol of his educational and religious ideology in the age of Enlightenment, creating a double-layered ero-graphy composed of the pure (educational) surface of Pamela’s virginity and, on the obverse side, the obscene gaze that provokes an ulterior but intense sexual fantasy. In fact, Richardson strongly wishes to differentiate Pamela’s purity from any type of contamination, and he would never have admitted that his novel effuses a sense of obscene enjoyment. Ironically, however, it is the obscene stain that makes Pamela from an insipid and monotonous heroine who passively reflects an educational idea to a more “educational and seductive” figure with a lustrous body that stimulates ulterior desire of readers in the realm of their unconsciousness. Of importance here is that the fascinating Richardsonian ideology of light, which aims to create Pamela as the icon of a pure virgin in the Enlightenment, entails a strong kind of violence against the female body that is no longer sexually and morally pure. This obscene stain which makes the surface of light more lustrous in Pamela, resuscitated in diverse forms in other great educational novels of the eighteenth century Enlightenment, such as Rousseau’s Julie, or the New Heloise and Goethe’s Elective Affinities, could be a crucial theoretical tool for revealing the obverse of light, a realm in which obscenity and violence are deeply and surreptitiously inscribed.

Abstract

By focusing on obscene stain evoked in Pamela, this paper aims to examine the way in which Pamela impressively embodies the obscenity seeping into the idea of the light in the educational Enlightenment novel. Inspired by Zizek’s notion of obscenity and Jean Starobinski’s concept of transparency and veil, we define the obscene not simply as lustful and salacious sensations or ideas, but as excessive enjoyment that the symbolic stage or form cannot fully represent. Samuel Richardson elevates Pamela’s virginal body as a symbol of his educational and religious ideology in the age of Enlightenment, creating a double-layered ero-graphy composed of the pure (educational) surface of Pamela’s virginity and, on the obverse side, the obscene gaze that provokes an ulterior but intense sexual fantasy. In fact, Richardson strongly wishes to differentiate Pamela’s purity from any type of contamination, and he would never have admitted that his novel effuses a sense of obscene enjoyment. Ironically, however, it is the obscene stain that makes Pamela from an insipid and monotonous heroine who passively reflects an educational idea to a more “educational and seductive” figure with a lustrous body that stimulates ulterior desire of readers in the realm of their unconsciousness. Of importance here is that the fascinating Richardsonian ideology of light, which aims to create Pamela as the icon of a pure virgin in the Enlightenment, entails a strong kind of violence against the female body that is no longer sexually and morally pure. This obscene stain which makes the surface of light more lustrous in Pamela, resuscitated in diverse forms in other great educational novels of the eighteenth century Enlightenment, such as Rousseau’s Julie, or the New Heloise and Goethe’s Elective Affinities, could be a crucial theoretical tool for revealing the obverse of light, a realm in which obscenity and violence are deeply and surreptitiously inscribed.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 이충훈, "장 자크 루소 투명성과 장애물" (2012), 아카넷
  2. 이시연, "『안티파멜라』로 되돌아보는 『파멜라』 논쟁의 쟁점들", 근대영미소설, 13(2), pp.103~125 (2006), 한국근대영미소설학회
  3. 정재식, "『클라리사』의 바로크: 테네브리즘(Tenebrism)과 균열의 알레고리", 근대영미소설, 16(3), pp.157~184 (2009), 한국근대영미소설학회
  4. Castle, Terry, "Clarissa’s Ciphers: Meaning and Disruption in Richardson’s Clarissa" (1982), Cornell UP
  5. Choi, Julie, "Obscene Readings: Transport in the Eighteenth-Century Novel", 근대영미소설, 6(1), pp.347~371 (1999)
  6. 정재식, "On the Shattered Vision and the Ruins of the Mirror (Hymen) in Clarissa", 근대영미소설, 13(1), pp.325~346 (2006), 한국근대영미소설학회
  7. Derrida, Jacques, "Violence and Metaphysics, In Writing and Difference", pp.79~153 (1978), U. of Chicago P
  8. Diderot, Denis, "In Praise of Richardson, In Selected Writings on Art and Literature", pp.82~97 (1994), Penguin
  9. Friedman, Emily, "Remarks on Richardson: Sarah Fielding and Rational Reader", Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 22(2), pp.309~326 (2010)
  10. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, "Elective Affinities" (2008), Oxford UP
  11. Keymer, Tom, "The Pamela Controversy: Criticisms and Adaptations of Samuel Richardson's Pamela 1740-1750. 2 vols" (2001), Chatto
  12. Richardson, Samuel, "Clarissa: or, History of a Young Lady" (1986), Penguin
  13. Richardson, Samuel, "Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded" (2008), Oxford UP
  14. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, "Julie, or the New Heloise" (1997), UP of New England
  15. Sussman, Charlotte, "Eighteenth-Century English Literature: Cultural History" (2012), Polity
  16. Warner, William B., "Licensing Entertainment: The Elevation of Novel Reading in Britain, 1684-1750" (1998), U of California P
  17. Warner, William B., "Reading Clarissa : The Struggles of Interpretation" (1979), Yale UP
  18. Žižek, Slavoj, "How to Read Lacan" (2006), Norton

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)