본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『클라리사』의 바로크: 테네브리즘(Tenebrism)과 균열의 알레고리

On the Baroque in Clarissa: Tenebrism and the Allegory of Rupture

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper aims to reveal the baroque aura of Clarissa by focusing on the notion of allegory and tenebrism, the baroque artistic technique embodying the dynamic and dramatic contrast of light and darkness. Informed by Lacanian thought, the baroque can be defined as the art of jouissance with a Christian trait, the extreme enjoyment in pain. In this context, the baroque can be called the art of theological eroticism, which is powerfully manifested in the experience of the modern subject in its encounter with religious and corporeal excess. In Clarissa, Lovelace is a genius of the baroque in the erotic and delirious dramatization of ‘his perverted self-reflective vision of Clarissa’s virginity’ and ‘his conscience itself’ through tenebrism. In contrast, Clarissa reveals a deep repugnance for Lovelace’s erotically deceptive and excessive images, and aspires to create herself as the Protestant baroque virgin martyr through constructing her sacred father's house with austere, restrained and condensed language. Richardson ultimately aims to embody Clarissa as an absolutely idealized sacred icon through the mode of allegory grounded upon his stark dichotomous perspective on good and evil. As a result, the ending of Clarissa loses the intensity of the baroque that has been dramatically embodied in the masterful execution of tenebrism. Of importance here is that the core of Clarissa lies not in a moral and biblical allegory that Richardson intends to employ but in the allegory of rupture penetrated by the baroque jouissance that he cannot fully control. There is indeed a gap between the mode of allegory which Richardson strongly wishes to employ and the baroque allegory which he actually creates. Viewed thus, Richardson can be called a failed allegorist. Intriguingly, however, it is at the point of failure that Clarissa becomes a far richer and more fascinating baroque masterpiece.

Abstract

This paper aims to reveal the baroque aura of Clarissa by focusing on the notion of allegory and tenebrism, the baroque artistic technique embodying the dynamic and dramatic contrast of light and darkness. Informed by Lacanian thought, the baroque can be defined as the art of jouissance with a Christian trait, the extreme enjoyment in pain. In this context, the baroque can be called the art of theological eroticism, which is powerfully manifested in the experience of the modern subject in its encounter with religious and corporeal excess. In Clarissa, Lovelace is a genius of the baroque in the erotic and delirious dramatization of ‘his perverted self-reflective vision of Clarissa’s virginity’ and ‘his conscience itself’ through tenebrism. In contrast, Clarissa reveals a deep repugnance for Lovelace’s erotically deceptive and excessive images, and aspires to create herself as the Protestant baroque virgin martyr through constructing her sacred father's house with austere, restrained and condensed language. Richardson ultimately aims to embody Clarissa as an absolutely idealized sacred icon through the mode of allegory grounded upon his stark dichotomous perspective on good and evil. As a result, the ending of Clarissa loses the intensity of the baroque that has been dramatically embodied in the masterful execution of tenebrism. Of importance here is that the core of Clarissa lies not in a moral and biblical allegory that Richardson intends to employ but in the allegory of rupture penetrated by the baroque jouissance that he cannot fully control. There is indeed a gap between the mode of allegory which Richardson strongly wishes to employ and the baroque allegory which he actually creates. Viewed thus, Richardson can be called a failed allegorist. Intriguingly, however, it is at the point of failure that Clarissa becomes a far richer and more fascinating baroque masterpiece.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 정재식, "들뢰즈 혹은 암호 해독가: 바로크와 성 테레사의 희열", 비평과이론, 10(2), pp.95~115 (2005), 한국비평이론학회
  2. Allot, Miriam, "Novelists On The Novel" (1980), Routeledge and Kegan Paul
  3. Budd, Adam, "Why Clarissa Must Die: Richardson’s Tragedy and Editorial Heroism", Eighteenth-Century Life, 31(3), pp.1~28 (2007)
  4. Canfield, J. Douglas, "The Baroque in English Neoclassical Literature" (2003), U. of Delaware P
  5. Doody, Margaret, "A Natural Passion: A Study of the Novels of Samuel Richardson" (1974), Clarendon Press
  6. Dussinger, John A., "Conscience and the Pattern of Christian Perfection in Clarissa", PMLA, 81(3), pp.236~245 (1986)
  7. Harries, Jocelyn, "Samuel Richardson" (1987), Cambridge UP
  8. Hook, Judith, "The Baroque Age in England" (1976), Themes and Hudson
  9. 정재식, "On the Shattered Vision and the Ruins of the Mirror (Hymen) in Clarissa", 근대영미소설, 13(1), pp.325~346 (2006), 한국근대영미소설학회
  10. The Limits of Love and Knowledge Vol. 20 of the Seminar of Jacques Lacan, "Encore 1972-1973: On Feminine Sexuality", pp.1998, Lacan, Jacques
  11. Lacan, Jacques, "The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960 Vol. 7 of the Seminar of Jacques Lacan" (1998), Norton
  12. Marks, Sylvia Kasey, "‘Clarissa’ as Conduct Book", South Atlantic Review, 51(4), pp.3~16 (1986)
  13. Martin, Louis, "To Destroy Painting" (1955), U of Chicago Press
  14. Praz, Mario, "Baroque in England", Modern Philology, 61(3), pp.169~170 (1964)
  15. Rezepinska, Maria, "Tenebrism in Baroque Painting and Its Ideological Background", Artibus et Historiae, 7(13), pp.91~112 (1986)
  16. Richardson, Samuel, "Clarissa: or, History of a Young Lady" (1986), Penguin
  17. Richardson, Samuel, "Clarissa: or, History of a Young Lady" (1932), Dent
  18. Walmsley, Peter, "Live to Die, Die to Live: An Introduction", Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 21(1), pp.1~11 (2008)
  19. Warner, William Beatty, "Reading Clarissa: The Struggle of Interpretation" (1979), Yale UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)