Utterance-Initial Sentential Anaphor That
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper claims that utterance-initial sentential anaphor that is a representative implicit performative act that emphasizes the speaker’s acquisition of new information. As a speech act deixis which ordinarily grammaticalizes the roles of discourse participants, the use of utterance-initial sentential anaphor that is more dynamic than the use of utterance-initial sentential anaphor it in that the occurrence of utterance-initial sentential anaphor that necessarily evokes discourse participants in the utterance where it appears and in the previous utterance where the antecedent is found. Thus, the information carried by utterance-initial sentential anaphor that is activated by the speaker at the moment of speaking and is not in focus in the discourse, in contrast to the information carried by utterance-initial sentential anaphor it.
Abstract
This paper claims that utterance-initial sentential anaphor that is a representative implicit performative act that emphasizes the speaker’s acquisition of new information. As a speech act deixis which ordinarily grammaticalizes the roles of discourse participants, the use of utterance-initial sentential anaphor that is more dynamic than the use of utterance-initial sentential anaphor it in that the occurrence of utterance-initial sentential anaphor that necessarily evokes discourse participants in the utterance where it appears and in the previous utterance where the antecedent is found. Thus, the information carried by utterance-initial sentential anaphor that is activated by the speaker at the moment of speaking and is not in focus in the discourse, in contrast to the information carried by utterance-initial sentential anaphor it.
참고문헌 (22)
- Bach, K., "The Myth of Conventional Implicature", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, pp.327~366 (1999)
- Bach, K., "Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts" (1979), MIT Press
- Comrie, B., "Conditionals: A Typology, In On Conditionals", pp.77~99 (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Dummet, M., "Frege: Philosophy of Language" (1973), Duckworsth
- Grice, H. P., "Logic and Conversation, In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1967), Academic Press
- Grosz, B., "Toward a Computational Theory of Discourse Interpretation", Ms, ~ (1986)
- Gundel, J. K., "Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse", Language, 69, pp.274~307 (1993)
- Gundel, J. K., "Centering Theory and the Givenness Hierarchy: Toward a Synthesis, In Centering Theory in Discourse", pp.183~198 (1998), Clarendon Press
- Horn, R., "A Natural History of Negation" (1989), CSLI Publications
- Iatridou, S., "Topics in Conditionals", 박사, pp.1991
- Kaimo, A., "Some Referential Properties of English It and That, In Function and Structure: In Honor of Susumu Kuno", pp.289~315 (1998), John Benjamins
- 김석훈, "The Processing of Sentential Anaphors in the Centering Theory", 언어와 정보 사회, 8, pp.1~29 (2007), 언어정보연구소
- Lakoff, G., "Linguistics and Natural Logic, In Semantics of Natural Language", pp.545~665 (1972), Reidel
- Linde, C., "Focus of Attention and the Choice of Pronouns in Discourse, In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantatative Cross- language Study", pp.337~353 (1979), John Benjamins
- Ross, J. R., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", 박사, pp.1970
- Sadock, J., "Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts" (1974), Academic Press
- Saeed, J., "Semantics" (2003), Blackwell
- Searle, R. J., "Speech Acts: An Essay in Philosophy of Language" (1969), Cambridge University Press
- Siegel, M., "Biscuit Conditionals : Quantification Over Potential Literal Acts", Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, pp.167~203 (2006)
- Sweetser, Eve., "From Etymology to Pragmatics : Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Van der Auwera, J., "Conditionals and Speech Acts, In On Conditionals", pp.197~214 (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Walker, M. A., "Centering Theory in Discourse" (1998), Oxford University Press