본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미술대학 입학사정관제 정착과 개선방안에 관한 연구

A Research of Settlement and Improvement of the Admission Officer System for Schools of Art in Korean Universities

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

It has been five years since the implementation of the admission officer system to resolve the two periodic tasks - to activate public education and to strengthen autonomy of universities. Despite the several concerns in the beginning,results of many researches and reports supporting the effectiveness of the Admission Officer System were announced one after another and the increase in the actual number of the implementing universities have proven the system to be one of the most advanced university admissions systems until this day. Hence, new ways of skill tests and other types of examinations which evaluate various talents of students have been introduced during the past 13 years. As types of entrance examinations for schools of art have been diversified, several universities have actively executed the Admission Officer System as the best solution for the examination. According to this research, the holistic evaluation process of the Admission Officer System can evaluate many art and design-related qualities. Futhermore,there are many possibilities that the Admission Officer System can solve various problems from the past entrance examination systems. For this research, I accept these changes in a positive perspective and propose several steps to settle and improve the Admission Officer System for schools of art in Korean universities. In conclusion, each university must first establish own concept of talent and academic curriculums, and also should establish proper substantial proposal for the Admission Officer System to develop and specialize own entrance examination processes. Accordingly, the ways of entrance examinations should be precisely directed based on the concept of talent and curriculums of each university.

Abstract

It has been five years since the implementation of the admission officer system to resolve the two periodic tasks - to activate public education and to strengthen autonomy of universities. Despite the several concerns in the beginning,results of many researches and reports supporting the effectiveness of the Admission Officer System were announced one after another and the increase in the actual number of the implementing universities have proven the system to be one of the most advanced university admissions systems until this day. Hence, new ways of skill tests and other types of examinations which evaluate various talents of students have been introduced during the past 13 years. As types of entrance examinations for schools of art have been diversified, several universities have actively executed the Admission Officer System as the best solution for the examination. According to this research, the holistic evaluation process of the Admission Officer System can evaluate many art and design-related qualities. Futhermore,there are many possibilities that the Admission Officer System can solve various problems from the past entrance examination systems. For this research, I accept these changes in a positive perspective and propose several steps to settle and improve the Admission Officer System for schools of art in Korean universities. In conclusion, each university must first establish own concept of talent and academic curriculums, and also should establish proper substantial proposal for the Admission Officer System to develop and specialize own entrance examination processes. Accordingly, the ways of entrance examinations should be precisely directed based on the concept of talent and curriculums of each university.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 교육부·한국대학교육협의회, "2013년 위촉입학사정관 연수 자료집", ~ (2013)
  2. 김경범, "미국과 일본 대학의 입학사정관제 운영 사례와 시사점", 비교교육연구, 19(3), pp.79~106 (2009), 한국비교교육학회
  3. 김경현, "미술대학 입학사정관제" (2012), 미대입시사
  4. 김형숙, "한국의 미술대학 입시제도 현황과 분석", 조형교육, (21) (2003), 한국조형교육학회
  5. 길임주, "디자인전공분야 무실기전형 학생선발을 위한 입학사정관의 심층면접 문항", 한국디자인학회 춘계학술발표대회 논문집, pp.14~15 (2009)
  6. 길임주, "디자인대학 입시에서 비실기전형의 현황", 디자인학연구, 24(2), pp.153~162 (2011), 한국디자인학회
  7. 길임주, "디자인 대학입시에서 입학사정관 전형의 도입에 대한 탐색 - 입학사정관들을 대상으로", 디자인융복합연구(구.인포디자인이슈), 11(2), pp.179~190 (2012), 디자인융복합학회(구.한국인포디자인학회)
  8. 노재선, "미술대학 입시제도가 나아가야 할 방향 연구 : 미술대학 입학사정관제 도입에 관하여", 석사, 미술교육, pp.2010
  9. 미대입시사 편집부, "입시대비 미술대학 핵심가이드" (2013), 미대입시사
  10. 서종욱, "홍익대학교 미술대학 입시 개혁과 입학사정관제 도입 계획", 대학교육, 160, pp.94~100 (2009)
  11. 연명흠, "디자인능력에 미치는 입시미술 효과 분석 및 입시미술에 대한 논의", 디자인학연구, 23(7), pp.4~29 (2010), 한국디자인학회
  12. 대학입학사정관제 워크숍자료, "윤달수", 한국대학교육협의회, ~, pp.(ISP-2007-4-29) (2007)
  13. 이상선, "디자인대학 실기입시제도의 문제점 -입시 성적과 입학 후 실기과목 학업성취도 비교와 디자인대학 교수인터뷰 결과를 중심으로-", 디자인학연구, 21(5), pp.103~112 (2008), 한국디자인학회
  14. 이은옥, "국내 디자인대학의 학생선발제도 현황 및 분석", 한국디자인문화학회지, 15(1), pp.270~285 (2009), 한국디자인문화학회
  15. 이윤미, "입학사정관제도 확대를 우려하며", 우리교육, 8, pp.72~79 (2009)
  16. 이헌국, "디자인계열 대학입학생의 실기능력 유무에 따른 조형학습 효과에 대한 연구", 디자인학연구, 15(4), pp.38~398 (2002), 한국디자인학회
  17. 정광희, "입학사정관제 성공적 정착을 위한 방안 탐색" (2009), 한국교육개발원
  18. 정연우, "현행 입시위주 교육현장에서의 미술교육 실태와 개선방안에 관한 연구", 석사, 미술교육, pp.2008
  19. 한국대학교육협의회, "2014 전형유형별 모집인원", ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)