본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

통사부 진화와 생물언어학

Evolution of Syntax and Biolinguistics

최숙희
한국현대언어학회 (The Modern Linguistic Society Of Korea)|2015.11|언어연구 (Linguistic Research)|제31권 제3호|pp. 733-753|DOI 10.18627/jslg.31.3.201511.733

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

syntaxevolutionMergebiolinguisticssaltationalincremental
주제분류언어학

초록

Choe, Sook Hee. 2015. Evolution of Syntax and Biolinguistics. The Journal of Studies in Language 31.3, 733-753. This paper is to investigate the evolution of syntax from the biolinguistic perspectives. Biolinguistics examines the internalized biological result of language faculty, including its mechanism (structure and function), development and evolution. In biolinguistic minimalism the basic concepts such as recursive Merge, precursors to Merge are examined for the evolution of syntax. Concerning the precursors to Merge, Chomsky’s view is supported that we may not suppose there were the precursors to the unbounded Merge for both evolution and development. Then the saltational view that syntax was the result of a single evolutionary development within the Minimalist Program is compared with the incremental view that the evolution of syntax involved multiple stages between the communication system and modern syntax. It is argued that the parallel architecture may be compatible with a saltational theory of syntactic evolution. Hence, it is concluded that the emergence of syntax with the single evolutional development in the saltational view can explain most of syntactic mechanisms focusing on the recursive combinatorial operation Merge. (KAIST)

Abstract

Choe, Sook Hee. 2015. Evolution of Syntax and Biolinguistics. The Journal of Studies in Language 31.3, 733-753. This paper is to investigate the evolution of syntax from the biolinguistic perspectives. Biolinguistics examines the internalized biological result of language faculty, including its mechanism (structure and function), development and evolution. In biolinguistic minimalism the basic concepts such as recursive Merge, precursors to Merge are examined for the evolution of syntax. Concerning the precursors to Merge, Chomsky’s view is supported that we may not suppose there were the precursors to the unbounded Merge for both evolution and development. Then the saltational view that syntax was the result of a single evolutionary development within the Minimalist Program is compared with the incremental view that the evolution of syntax involved multiple stages between the communication system and modern syntax. It is argued that the parallel architecture may be compatible with a saltational theory of syntactic evolution. Hence, it is concluded that the emergence of syntax with the single evolutional development in the saltational view can explain most of syntactic mechanisms focusing on the recursive combinatorial operation Merge. (KAIST)

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김양순, "생물언어학과 통사론의 진화적 타당성", 언어연구, 25(1), pp.47~68 (2009), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  2. 최숙희, "Language Faculty and Biolinguistics", 언어연구, 27(2), pp.373~391 (2011), 한국현대언어학회
  3. 최숙희, "생물언어학 관점에서 회귀성과 인간언어", 언어연구, 28(3), pp.579~598 (2012), 한국현대언어학회
  4. 최숙희, "생물언어학적 관점에서 인간언어의 진화", 언어연구, 29(3), pp.571~591 (2013), 한국현대언어학회
  5. 최숙희, "인간정신과 언어사용의 창조성", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.605~624 (2014), 한국현대언어학회
  6. Berwick, R. C., "Approaches to the Evolution of Language", pp.320~340 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  7. Berwick, R. C., "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.65~99 (2011), Oxford University Press
  8. Berwick, R. C., "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.461~491 (2011), Oxford University Press
  9. Berwick, R. C, "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.19~41 (2011), Oxford University Press
  10. Bickerton, D., "Language and Species" (1990), University of Chicago Press
  11. Bickerton, D, "Approaches to the Evolution of Language", pp.341~358 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  12. Bierwisch, M., "New Essays on the Origin of Language", pp.55~79 (2001), Mouton de Gruyter
  13. Boeckx. C., "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.42~64 (2011), Oxford University Press
  14. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program. Cambridge" (1995), The MIT Press
  15. Chomsky, N., "Three Factors in the Design of Language", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
  16. Chomsky, N., "Biolinguistic Explorations: Design, Development, Evolution", International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15, pp.1~21 (2007)
  17. Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), The MIT Press
  18. Chomsky, N., "Some Simple Evo Devo Theses: How True Might They Be for Language?", pp.45~62 (2010), Cambridge University Press
  19. Chomsky, N., "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.19~41 (2011), Oxford University Press
  20. Clark, B., "Syntactic Theory and the Evolution of Syntax", Biolinguistics, 7, pp.169~197 (2013)
  21. Coyne, J. A., "Why Evolution Is True" (2009), Viking
  22. Culicover, P. W., "Simpler Syntax" (2005), Oxford University Press
  23. Di Sciullo, A. M., "he Biological Nature of Human Language", Biolinguistics, 4, pp.4~34 (2010)
  24. Fitch, W. T., "The Evolution of Syntax: An Exaptationist Perspective", Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 3, pp.1~12 (2011)
  25. Friederici, A. D., "The Brain Differentiates Human and Non-Human Grammars: Functional Localization and Structural Connectivity", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, pp.2458~2463
  26. Fujita, K., "Facing the Logical Problem of Language Evolution", English Linguistics, 24, pp.78~108 (2007)
  27. Fujita, K., "A Prospect for Evolutionary Adequacy: Merge and the Evolution and Development of Human Language", Biolinguistics, 3, pp.128~153 (2009)
  28. Hauser, M. D., "The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How did It Evolve?", Science, 298, pp.1569~1579 (2002)
  29. Horwitz, B., "Activation of Broca’s Area during the Production of Spoken and Signed Language: A Combined Cytoarchitectonic Mapping and PET Analysis", Neuropsychologia, 41, pp.1868~1876 (2003)
  30. Jackendoff, R., "Possible Stages in the Evolution of the Language Capacity", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, pp.272~279 (1999)
  31. Jackendoff, R., "Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution" (2002), Oxford University Press
  32. Jackendoff, R., "Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure" (2007), The MIT Press
  33. Jackendoff, R., "Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The State of the Art", The Linguistic Review, 24, pp.347~401 (2007)
  34. Jackendoff, R., "The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives", pp.63~72 (2010), Cambridge University Press
  35. Jackendoff, R., "What Is the Human Language Faculty? Two Views", Language, 87, pp.586~624 (2011)
  36. Jenkins, L., "Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics" (2004), Elsevier
  37. Johansson, S., "Origins of Language: Constraints on Hypotheses" (2005), John Benjamins
  38. Pinker, S., "Natural Language and Natural Selection", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, pp.707~784 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

생물언어학 관점에서 본 Chomsky의 언어기제 연구홍경선한국영어영문학회 · 영어영문학2021 · 제26권 제1호생물언어학과 통사론의 진화적 타당성김양순, 최숙희한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2009 · 제25권 제1호생물언어학 관점에서 회귀성과 인간언어최숙희한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2012 · 제28권 제3호Language Faculty and Biolinguistics최숙희한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2011 · 제27권 제2호인간정신과 언어사용의 창조성최숙희한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2014 · 제30권 제3호Subject Inversion Constructions and Third Factor Principles김양순한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2014 · 제30권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

일치에 의한 There의 의미속성과 격김성헌pp. 535-557종료 유의동사가 갖는 명사연어의 의미범주 코퍼스기반 연구김준기pp. 559-581Processing Subject and Indirect Object Relative Clauses김채은pp. 583-604제약서열과 사용빈도: 한국어 Cwa 연쇄의 경우김선회, 남성현pp. 605-627A Lexico-Grammatical Feature of English as a Lingua Franca in an Asian Context민수정pp. 629-644
원문 보기