본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

On Less and Amount Used with Plural Count Nouns

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present study is concerned with the less and amount constructions that are used with plural count nouns, like less students and ... amount of people, etc. We found out, through the examination of the large-scale corpora such as COCA, COHA, BNC, that these constructions are not new usages and are not increasing these days, contrary to Foster (1968: 217-18), Bauer (2002), Mair and Leech (2006: 320) and others. It is clear that these constructions cannot be ignored as mere speech errors. They have been used for a long time in English. Our argument is that the constant use of these constructions is not ascribed to the changes of less and amount themselves, but to the recategorization/respecification/ reclassification of plural nouns into singular nouns in certain circumstances through semantic extension. The phenomenon of nouns shifting from the category mass to count (e.g. two coffees) is relatively well-known. We argue here that the vice-versa recategorization is possible, as Huddleston and Pullum (2002: 346, 354) and Quirk et al. (1985: 309-10) argue, too. The main evidence for this argument is that other quantifiers such as much, (a) little, deal of and quantity of, which are normally used with non-count singular nouns, can be used with plural count nouns, too, just like less and amount (e.g. (how) much Americans). And we also found that nearly the same specific group of nouns are used with both less and much in their plural forms. Our conclusion is that the much + plural construction might have been the source construction for the less + plural or the amount of + plural constructions.

Abstract

The present study is concerned with the less and amount constructions that are used with plural count nouns, like less students and ... amount of people, etc. We found out, through the examination of the large-scale corpora such as COCA, COHA, BNC, that these constructions are not new usages and are not increasing these days, contrary to Foster (1968: 217-18), Bauer (2002), Mair and Leech (2006: 320) and others. It is clear that these constructions cannot be ignored as mere speech errors. They have been used for a long time in English. Our argument is that the constant use of these constructions is not ascribed to the changes of less and amount themselves, but to the recategorization/respecification/ reclassification of plural nouns into singular nouns in certain circumstances through semantic extension. The phenomenon of nouns shifting from the category mass to count (e.g. two coffees) is relatively well-known. We argue here that the vice-versa recategorization is possible, as Huddleston and Pullum (2002: 346, 354) and Quirk et al. (1985: 309-10) argue, too. The main evidence for this argument is that other quantifiers such as much, (a) little, deal of and quantity of, which are normally used with non-count singular nouns, can be used with plural count nouns, too, just like less and amount (e.g. (how) much Americans). And we also found that nearly the same specific group of nouns are used with both less and much in their plural forms. Our conclusion is that the much + plural construction might have been the source construction for the less + plural or the amount of + plural constructions.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Bauer, L, "Hitting a Moving Target", English Today, 18(4), pp.55~59 (2002)
  2. "The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 450+ million words, 1990-Present" (2008)[URL]
  3. "The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400+ million words, 1810-2009" (2010)[URL]
  4. Foster, B., "The Changing English Language" (1968), Penguin Books
  5. Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  6. Jespersen, O, "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles" (1909), Allen and Unwin
  7. Leech, G., "Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  8. Mair, C., "Twentieth-Century English. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  9. Mair, C., "Current Changes in English Syntax, In The Handbook of English Linguistics", pp.318~342 (2006), Blackwell
  10. Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  11. Ruin, I, "Review of Number and Countability in English Nouns: An Embodied Model (Patrik Svensson. Umeå University. 1998)", Studia Neophilologica, 71, pp.264~266 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)