한국인 영어 학습자의 동음이의어 ‘for∼four'와 'to∼two'의 음성실현에 대한 연구
Phonetic Realization of the Homophone Pairs ‘for∼four' and 'to∼two' by Korean Learners of English
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Homophones are words which are pronounced the same but have different meanings. Contrary to a wide variety of studies on homophone production by native speakers (Cohn et al. 2005, Gahl 2008, Guion 1995, Oh 2013b, Whalen 1991), the production of homophones by second language learners is rarely investigated. This paper explores how the two English homophone pairs 'for∼four' and 'to∼two' are phonetically differently realized by Korean learners of English. A production experiment was conducted on 15 Korean university students. Each participant produced the two homophone pairs depending on the following three conditions: i) citation, ii) unaccented phrase-medial, and iii) accented phrase-medial. Five acoustic measurements (duration, F1, F2, intensity, and F0) were compared for each homophone pair. Results revealed that in citation forms, both homophone pairs 'for∼four' and 'to∼two' did not show any significant differences in all five acoustic measures. In unaccented condition, no distinction was found in all five acoustic measurements for the homophone words 'for' and 'four', but there was a significant difference for the homophone words 'to' and 'two' only in F2. In accented condition, no distinction was found in duration, F1, F2, and intensity, but a significant difference in F0, for both homophone pairs. These results imply that Korean learners of English generally produce homophone words as identical in all contexts and do not show the phonetic reduction of function words as in native speakers of English.
Abstract
Homophones are words which are pronounced the same but have different meanings. Contrary to a wide variety of studies on homophone production by native speakers (Cohn et al. 2005, Gahl 2008, Guion 1995, Oh 2013b, Whalen 1991), the production of homophones by second language learners is rarely investigated. This paper explores how the two English homophone pairs 'for∼four' and 'to∼two' are phonetically differently realized by Korean learners of English. A production experiment was conducted on 15 Korean university students. Each participant produced the two homophone pairs depending on the following three conditions: i) citation, ii) unaccented phrase-medial, and iii) accented phrase-medial. Five acoustic measurements (duration, F1, F2, intensity, and F0) were compared for each homophone pair. Results revealed that in citation forms, both homophone pairs 'for∼four' and 'to∼two' did not show any significant differences in all five acoustic measures. In unaccented condition, no distinction was found in all five acoustic measurements for the homophone words 'for' and 'four', but there was a significant difference for the homophone words 'to' and 'two' only in F2. In accented condition, no distinction was found in duration, F1, F2, and intensity, but a significant difference in F0, for both homophone pairs. These results imply that Korean learners of English generally produce homophone words as identical in all contexts and do not show the phonetic reduction of function words as in native speakers of English.
참고문헌 (11)
- 오영일, "한국인 영어 학습자의 기능어 for와 to의 음성실현에 대한 연구", 영어학연구, 19(2), pp.165~184 (2013), 한국영어학학회
- 오영일, "동음이의어 ‘for—four’와 ‘to—two’의 음성실현 연구", 언어학, 21(4), pp.185~205 (2013), 대한언어학회
- "Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.3.42)" (2013)[URL]
- Cohn, A., "Lexical Frequency Effects and Phonetic Duration of English Homophones: An Acoustic Study", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, pp.2036~ (2005)
- Fromkin, V., "An Introduction to Language (9th edition)" (2011), Cengage Learning
- Gahl, S, ""Thyme" and "Time" are Not Homophones: The Effect of Lemma Frequency on Word Durations in Spontaneous Speech", Language, 84(3), pp.474~496 (2008)
- Galbraith, G, "Homophone Units: A Normative and Methodological Investigation of the Strength of Component Elements", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, pp.737~744 (1969)
- Godfrey, J., "Switchboard: Telephone Speech Corpus for Research and Development", Paper presented at the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (1992)
- Guion, S, "Word Frequency Effects among Homonyms", Texas Linguistic Forum, 35, pp.103~116 (1995)
- Lavoie, L, "Some Influences on the Realization of for and four in American English", Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32, pp.175~202 (2002)
- Whalen, D, "Infrequent Words are Longer in Duration than Frequent Words", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, pp.2311~ (1991)
