본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

뇌졸중 환자들의 한국어판 Modified Version of Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke의 신뢰도와 타당도

The Reliability and Validity of the Modified Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke(Korean Version) in Stroke Patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타사회과학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 수정된 뇌졸중 자세 평가 척도(modified Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, mPASS)의 한국어판을 만들고 신뢰도와 동시(Concurrent)ㆍ집중타당도(Convergent Validity)를 조사하는 것이었다. 본 연구에는 만성 뇌졸중 환자 32명이 참여하였다. 한국어판 mPASS의 개별 항목에 대한 신뢰도 분석은 측정자간 관찰 일치비율(%)과 카파 계수(Kappa coefficient)로 표기하였고, mPASS의 개개 항목과 전체 점수는 스피어만 계수(Spearman coefficient)로 나타내었다. mPASS 총점의 측정자간 신뢰도(Inter-rater reliability)는 급간내상관계수(Intra class coefficient, ICC2,1)와 문항 내적 일치도인 Cronbach’s α 계수로 표기하였고, 절대적 신뢰도(측정 오차 신뢰도)는 표준오차 측정(Standard Error Measurement, SEM)과 최소 감지 변화(Minimal Detectable Change, MDC)를 이용하였다. mPASS의 동시 타당도 검증은 축소형 뇌졸중 자세평가 척도(Short Form-Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, SF-PASS), 버그균형척도(Berg Balance Scale, BBS)와의 상관관계로 알아보았고, 집중타당도는 수정된 바델 지수(Modified Barthel Index, MBI), 푸글-마이어 평가(Fugl Meyer-Upper/lower Extremity, FM-UE/LE)와의 관계를 스피어만 계수로 나타내었다. 본 연구의 결과 한국어판 mPASS의 12개 항목에 대한 측정자간 관찰된 일치율은 81%~97%였고, 개별 항목과 총점과의 상관계수는 높은 양의 상관관계(r=.81~.92)를 보였다. 한국어판 mPASS의 측정자간 신뢰도 K 계수는 평균 .83(.71~.90), ICC2,1= .97(.94~.96), 크론바 알파(Cronbach’s α)는 .93으로 매우 신뢰할만하였고, SEM과 MDC는 각각 .83, 2.30점으로 수용할만하였다. 한국어판 mPASS의 동시 타당도에서 SF-PASS(r=.89), BBS(r=.74)와는 높은 양의 상관관계가 있었고, 집중 타당도에서 MBI(r=.81), FM (r=.71~.76) 평가와는 높은 양의 상관관계가 있었다. 본 연구에서 만성 뇌졸중 환자들을 위한 한국어판 mPASS는 높은 신뢰도와 만족할만한 동시ㆍ집중타당도가 있음을 확인 할 수 있었고, 무작위 측정 오차 수준을 반영할 수 있는 SEM과 MDC 모두 수용할만하였다. 따라서 mPASS는 임상에서 뇌졸중 환자들의 자세조절을 평가하는데 유용하다고 할 수 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-rater reliability as well as the concurrent and convergent validity of the modified Postural Assessment Scale(mPASS) for stroke that translated into Korean in chronic stroke patients. The subjects participated in this study were thirty-two stroke patients with hemiparesis being able to walk independently. The mPASS scale was administered in 2 testing sessions 3 days apart. Inter-rater reliability(intraclass correlation coefficient ICC2,1), Internal consistency, and Kappa coefficient was used to examine the level of agreement between raters. Absolute reliability indices, including the Bland and Altman method, the standard error of measurement(SEM), and the Minimal Detectable Change(MDC). Concurrent validity was examined by correlating the total score of mPASS to the Short Form-Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke(SF- PASS), Berg Balance Scale(BBS), Convergent validity was examined by correlating the total score of mPASS to the Modified Barthel Index(MBI), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FM-UE/LE/total). The mPASS meets the following requirements: (1) The percentage agreement of these items ranged from 81%~97%, item- to -total correlations were all significant, ranging from r=.81~.92(p<.01). (2) The Kappa coefficient of the individual items of mPASS ranged from average K= .83(.71~.90)(substantial ~good), the overall inter-rater reliability of the mPASS total score was high ICC(2,1) =.97(.94~.96)(very reliable), and high internal consistency(Cronbach’s α-coefficient =.93) (3) The SEM and MDC of the mPASS representing were .83 and 2.30, respectively, indicating acceptable levels of measurement error (4) good concurrent validity: high correlation with SF-PASS(r=.89), BBS(r=.74) (5) convergent validity: high correlation between mPASS score on the MBI(r=.81), FM-UE/LE/total score(r=.71~.76)(p<.01). The mPASS is a reliable and valid for assessing the postural control for individuals with stroke. This result support implication for using the mPASS on the chronic stroke patients in clinical settings.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 안승헌, "뇌졸중 환자의 Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke(축소형 PASS: 5항목-3점 척도)와 Berg Balance Scale(축소형 BBS: 7항목-3점 척도)의 비교 연구", 대한물리의학회지, 5(1), pp.89~99 (2010), 대한물리의학회
  2. 안승헌, "뇌졸중 환자에 대한 체간 조절과 균형 및 일상생활동작 평가 도구의 비교 ; PASS, TCT, BBS, FM-B, MBI", 대한작업치료학회지, 16(4), pp.31~44 (2008), 대한작업치료학회
  3. 안승헌, "만성뇌졸중 환자의 Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke의 신뢰도와 타당도", 대한물리치료학회지, 21(1), pp.9~18 (2009), 대한물리치료학회
  4. 이영정, "뇌졸중 환자에서 Fugl-Meyer 평가척도와 보행속도, Timed Up & Go 검사와의 상관관계", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 11(1), pp.1~17 (2004), 한국전문물리치료학회
  5. 이정아, "한국판 버그 균형척도 평가도구의 라쉬분석", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 13(3), pp.49~56 (2006), 한국전문물리치료학회
  6. 최유임, "한국판 수정바델지수(K-MBI)의 타당도, 신뢰도, 문항변별도 검증: 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 13(9), pp.4119~4125 (2012), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  7. Beaton, D. E., "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), pp.3186~3191 (2000)
  8. Benaim, C., "Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients : the postural assessment scale for stroke patients(pass)", Stroke, 30(9), pp.1862~1868 (1999)
  9. Chien, C. W., "Developing a short form of the postural assessment scale for people with stroke", Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21(1), pp.81~90 (2007)
  10. Cohen J., "Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavior Science" (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Association
  11. Crow, J. L., "Hierarchical properties of the motor function sections of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale for people after stroke : a retrospective study", Physical therapy, 88(12), pp.1554~1567 (2008)
  12. Flansbjer, U. B., "Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke", Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(2), pp.75~82 (2005)
  13. Godi, M., "Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders", Physical Therapy, 93(2), pp.158~167 (2013)
  14. Haley, S. M., "Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy", Physical Therapy, 86(5), pp.735~743 (2006)
  15. Hsieh, Y. W., "Discriminative, predictive and evaluative properties of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement instrument in patients with stroke", Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(6), pp.454~460 (2007)
  16. Hsueh, I. P., "Individual-level responsiveness of the original and short-form postural assessment scale for stroke patients", Physical Therapy, 93(10), pp.1377~1382 (2013)
  17. Liaw, L. J., "The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients", Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(9), pp.656~661 (2008)
  18. Lu, W. S., "The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure", Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(8), pp.615~619 (2008)
  19. Mao, H. F., "Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients", Stroke, 33(4), pp.1022~1027 (2002)
  20. Nakagawa, S., "A farewell to Bonferroni : the problems of low statistical power and publication bias", Behavioral Ecology, 15(6), pp.1044~1045 (2004)
  21. Persson, C. U., "A validation study using a modified version of Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients : Postural Stroke Study in Gothenburg(POSTGOT)", Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 8, pp.57~ (2011)
  22. Wang, C. H., "Psycometric properties of 2 simplified 3-level balance scales used for patients with stroke", Physical Therapy, 84(5), pp.430~438 (2004)
  23. Wang, C. H., "Discriminative, predictive, and evaluative properties of a trunk control measure in patients with stroke", Physical Therapy, 85(9), pp.887~889 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)