본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Dynamics between two types of knowledge sharing and program performance in public organizations

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The study has two primary purposes. First, the study tries to examine dynamics between two types of knowledge sharing and program performance in public organizations. Second, it is to examine the effects of goal-setting as an individual factor and red-tape as a organizational factor on two types of knowledge sharing as well as program performance. For the purpose of the study, it uses structure equation model approach with the data from local government (the Virginia Department of Social Service). The results of analysis is as follows. First, while tacit knowledge sharing has an indirect impact on program performance, explicit knowledge sharing has a direct effect on program performance. Second, goal setting as an individual factor is positively related to tacit knowledge sharing. Red tape as a organizational factor is negatively related to explicit knowledge sharing. The results of the study show that two types of knowledge sharing has different effects on program performance and that different factors in public organizations have different effects on two types of knowledge sharing. It provides the evidence that there is the necessity of the study about distinction of knowledge sharing as well as other factors in public organizations to influence knowledge sharing.

Abstract

The study has two primary purposes. First, the study tries to examine dynamics between two types of knowledge sharing and program performance in public organizations. Second, it is to examine the effects of goal-setting as an individual factor and red-tape as a organizational factor on two types of knowledge sharing as well as program performance. For the purpose of the study, it uses structure equation model approach with the data from local government (the Virginia Department of Social Service). The results of analysis is as follows. First, while tacit knowledge sharing has an indirect impact on program performance, explicit knowledge sharing has a direct effect on program performance. Second, goal setting as an individual factor is positively related to tacit knowledge sharing. Red tape as a organizational factor is negatively related to explicit knowledge sharing. The results of the study show that two types of knowledge sharing has different effects on program performance and that different factors in public organizations have different effects on two types of knowledge sharing. It provides the evidence that there is the necessity of the study about distinction of knowledge sharing as well as other factors in public organizations to influence knowledge sharing.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Anderson, J.R., "The Architecture of Cognition" (1983), Harvard University Press
  2. Bock, G.W., "Breaking the Myths of Rewards: an Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing", Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), pp.14~21 (2002)
  3. Bozeman, B., "Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations", Administration & Society, 24(3), pp.290~322 (1992)
  4. Brewer, G.A., "The Impact of Red Tape on Governmental Performance : An Empirical Analysis", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), pp.233~257 (2010)
  5. Carmeli, A., "Leadership, Creative Problem Solving Capacity and Creative Performance: The Importance of Knowledge Sharing", Human Resource Management, 52(1), pp.95~122 (2013)
  6. Cheung, G.W., "Testing Mediation and Suppression Effects of Latent Variables Bootstrapping with Structural Equation Models", Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), pp.296~325 (2008)
  7. Chun, Y.H., "Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in US Federal Agencies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), pp.529~557 (2005)
  8. Gilson, L. L., "Unpacking the Cross-Level Effects of Tenure Diversity Explicit Knowledge, and knowledge Sharing on Individual Creativity", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, pp.203~222 (2013)
  9. Gorry, G. A., "Sharing Knowledge in the Public Sector: Two Case Studies", Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(2), pp.105~111 (2008)
  10. Grant, R. M., "Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.109~122 (1996)
  11. Gupta, A.K., "Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations", Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), pp.473~496 (2000)
  12. Haas, M.R., "When Using Knowledge Can Hurt Performance : The Value of Organizational Capabilities in a Management Consulting Company", Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), pp.1~24 (2005)
  13. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate Data Analysis" (2010), Prentice Hall
  14. Harlow, H., "The Effect of Tacit Knowledge on Firm Performance", Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), pp.148~163 (2008)
  15. Howells, J., "Tacit Knowledge", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), pp.91~106 (1996)
  16. Review of Child Protective Services in Virginia - A Report in a Series on the Operation and Performance of Virginia's Social Services System, in Commisson, "JLARC", The Virginia General Assembly, ~ (2005)
  17. 강여진, "지식공유 영향요인이 업무성과에 미치는 영향- 중앙부처공무원의 인식을 중심으로 -", 한국행정논집, 17(2), pp.431~458 (2005), 한국정부학회
  18. Kang, Y. J., "The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Work Performance: an Empirical Analysis of the Public Employees' Perceptions in South Korea", International Journal of Public Administration, 31(14), pp.1548~1568 (2008)
  19. The Administrative Behavior of Federal Bureau Chiefs, "Kaufman, H.", Brookings Institution, ~ (1981)
  20. Kline, R.B., "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling" (2010), The Guilford Press
  21. 이홍채, "지식공유와 업무성과에 관한 실증연구 -중앙행정기관을 중심으로-", 한국행정논집, 18(2), pp.515~538 (2006), 한국정부학회
  22. Lee, G.C., "The Study on the Relationships between Individual Knowledge Process and Knowledge Management in Firm Organization", Knowledge Management Research, 3(2), pp.31~48 (2002)
  23. Lesser, E.L., "Communities of Practice and Organizational Performance", IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), pp.831~841 (2001)
  24. Lipsky, M., "Street-Level Bureaucracy" (2010), Russell Sage Foundation
  25. Locke, E.A., "Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-year odyssey", American Psychologist, 57(9), pp.705~717 (2002)
  26. Lu, L., "Goal Orientation and Innovative Performance: the Mediating Roles of Knowledge Sharing and Perceived Autonomy", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1), pp.E180~E197 (2012)
  27. Maynard-Moody, S.W., "Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service" (2003), University of Michigan Press
  28. Meyers, M. K., "Handbook of public administration" (2003), Sage
  29. Nevitt, J., "Evaluating Small Sample Approaches for Model test Statistics in Structural Equation Modeling", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), pp.439~478 (2004)
  30. Nonaka, I., "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation", Organization science, 5(1), pp.14~37 (1994)
  31. Nonaka, I., "The Knowledge-Creating Company" (1995), Oxford University Press
  32. Nonaka, I., "Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion : Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory", Organization Science, 20(3), pp.635~652 (2009)
  33. O’Dell, C., "If Only We Knew What We Know", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.154~174 (1998)
  34. Pandey, S. K., "Red Tape : A Review and Assessment of Concepts and Measures", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), pp.553~580 (2002)
  35. Quigley, N. R., "A Multi-Level Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance", Organization science, 18(1), pp.71~88 (2007)
  36. Rainey, H.G., "Understanding and Managing Public Organizations" (2009), Jossey-Bass
  37. Rashman, L., "Organizational Learning and Knowledge in Public Sector Organizations: A Systematic Review of the Literature", International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, pp.463~494 (2009)
  38. Rousseau, D. M., "Issues of Level in Organizational Research: Multi-level and Cross-Level Perspectives", Research in organizational behavior, 7(1), pp.1~37 (1985)
  39. Schneider, A.L., "Why do Some Boundary Organizations Result in New Ideas and Practices and Others Only Meet Resistance? Examples from Juvenile Justice", American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), pp.60~79 (2009)
  40. Schoenherr, T., "Knowledge Management in Supply Chains : The Role of Explicit and Tacit Knowledge", Journal of Business Logistics, 35(2), pp.121~135 (2014)
  41. Srivastava, A., "Empowering Leadership in Management Teams : Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, and Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), pp.1239~1251 (2006)
  42. Taylor, W.A., "Organizational Readiness for Successful Knowledge Sharing : Challenges for Public Sector Managers", Information Resources Management Journal, 17(2), pp.22~37 (2004)
  43. Yao, L., "Knowledge Sharing in Asian Public Administration Sector : the Case of Hong Kong", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(1), pp.51~69 (2007)
  44. Yoo, J., "The Relationship between Organizational Variables and Client Outcomes: A Case Study in Child Welfare", Administration in Social Work, 26(2), pp.39~61 (2002)
  45. 윤창근, "지식공유와 성과간의 인과구조: 구조방정식을 활용한 지식공유의 결정모형과 성과에 대한 영향 분석", 지방정부연구, 21(2), pp.231~259 (2017), 한국지방정부학회[DOI]
  46. Zhou, S., "Effects of Social Tie Content on Knowledge Transfer", Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(3), pp.449~463 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)