본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

노로바이러스 감염 진단을 위한 신속항원검사법의 평가: 효소면역검사법(ELISA) 및 실시간정량 역전사중합효소연쇄반응 검사법과의 비교

Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Test for the Detection of Norovirus Infection: Comparison with ELISA and Real Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR Assays

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: Norovirus is a leading cause of epidemic and sporadic acute gastroenteritis worldwide. Because of the rapid transmission of the virus, early detection is important to prevent outbreak of norovirus infection. To evaluate the performance of a newly introduced rapid antigen test for detecting human norovirus in stool specimens, we compared it with the established ELISA test and real time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Methods: One hundred and eighty-four stool samples were analyzed by rapid antigen test (Denka-Seiken, Japan), ELISA (R-Biopharm, Germany),and qRT-PCR (R-Biopharm, Germany). Overall percent agreement, percent positive agreement (PPA), and percent negative agreement (NPA) of the rapid antigen test in comparison with ELISA and qRT-PCR were obtained. Results: Positive rates of rapid antigen test, ELISA, and qRT-PCR were 44.0% (81/184), 51.6% (95/184), and 42.9% (79/184), respectively. Seventy samples (38.0%) showed all positive, and 86 samples (46.7%) showed all negative results by three methods. Overall percent agreement of three methods was 84.8% (156/184). Overall percent agreement, PPA, and NPA of the rapid antigen test in comparison with qRT-PCR were 89.1%,88.6%, and 89.5%, respectively, and those of the rapid antigen test in comparison with ELISA were 90.2%, 83.2%, and 97.8%, respectively. Total procedure of the rapid antigen test was finished within 20 min. Conclusions: Rapid antigen test was easier and quicker to perform, and showed high agreement rates with ELISA and qRT-PCR. This test may be useful for rapid screening of norovirus infection.

Abstract

Background: Norovirus is a leading cause of epidemic and sporadic acute gastroenteritis worldwide. Because of the rapid transmission of the virus, early detection is important to prevent outbreak of norovirus infection. To evaluate the performance of a newly introduced rapid antigen test for detecting human norovirus in stool specimens, we compared it with the established ELISA test and real time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Methods: One hundred and eighty-four stool samples were analyzed by rapid antigen test (Denka-Seiken, Japan), ELISA (R-Biopharm, Germany),and qRT-PCR (R-Biopharm, Germany). Overall percent agreement, percent positive agreement (PPA), and percent negative agreement (NPA) of the rapid antigen test in comparison with ELISA and qRT-PCR were obtained. Results: Positive rates of rapid antigen test, ELISA, and qRT-PCR were 44.0% (81/184), 51.6% (95/184), and 42.9% (79/184), respectively. Seventy samples (38.0%) showed all positive, and 86 samples (46.7%) showed all negative results by three methods. Overall percent agreement of three methods was 84.8% (156/184). Overall percent agreement, PPA, and NPA of the rapid antigen test in comparison with qRT-PCR were 89.1%,88.6%, and 89.5%, respectively, and those of the rapid antigen test in comparison with ELISA were 90.2%, 83.2%, and 97.8%, respectively. Total procedure of the rapid antigen test was finished within 20 min. Conclusions: Rapid antigen test was easier and quicker to perform, and showed high agreement rates with ELISA and qRT-PCR. This test may be useful for rapid screening of norovirus infection.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Epidemic investigation of group diarrhea in the metropolitan area spread by a large meal service provider. Annual report on the epidemiologic investigation of infectious diseases, "Division of Epidemic Intelligence Service, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", 153~159 (2006)
  2. Epidemic investigation on Norwalk virus that caused food poisoning in Seo‘L. Annual report on the epidemiologic investigation of infectious diseases, "Division of Epidemic Intelligence Service, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", 103~113 (2003)
  3. 지영미, "노로바이러스 감염증의 국내역학", 소아감염, 14(1), pp.17~24 (2007), 한국소아감염병학회
  4. Jae In Lee, "Surveillance of Acute Gastroenteritis in Seoul, Korea, During May 2004 and June 2007", Journal of Bacteriology and Virology, 39(4), pp.363~371 (2009), 대한미생물학회
  5. Chung JY, "Detection of GII-4", 2006b Variant and Recombinant Noroviruses in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis, South Korea, 2010, pp.82, 146~152[DOI]
  6. 박동진, "Epidemiological Analysis of Norovirus Infection between March 2007 and February 2010", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 30(6), pp.647~653 (2010), 대한진단검사의학회
  7. Vinjé J, "Development and application of a capsid VP1 (region D) based reverse transcription PCR assay for genotyping of genogroup Ⅰ and Ⅱ noroviruses", J Virol Methods, 116, pp.109~117 (2004)
  8. Atmar RL, "Diagnosis of nonc‘Ltivatable gastroenteritis viruses, the human caliciviruses", Clin Microbiol Rev, 14, pp.15~37 (2001)
  9. Ando T, "Genetic classification of “Norwalklike viruses”", J Infect Dis, 181, pp.336~348 (2000)
  10. B‘Ll RA, "Emergence of a new norovirus genotype Ⅱ.4 variant associated with global outbreaks of gastroenteritis", J Clin Microbiol, 44, pp.327~333 (2006)
  11. Frankhauser RL, "Epidemiologic and molec‘Lar trends of “Norwalk-like viruses” associated with outbreaks of gastroenteritis in the United States", J Infect Dis, 186, pp.1~7 (2002)
  12. Zheng DP, "Norovirus classification and proposed strain nomenclature", Virology, 346, pp.312~323 (2006)
  13. Castriciano S, "Comparison of the RIDASCREEN® norovirus enzyme immunoassay to IDEIA NLV GⅠ", GⅡ by testing stools also assayed by RT-PCR and electron microscopy, 2007, pp.141, 216~219
  14. Bruins MJ, "Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of norovirus in stool samples", Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 29, pp.741~743 (2010)
  15. Kirby A, "An evaluation of the RIDASCREEN and IDEIA enzyme immunoassays and the RIDAQUICK immunochromatographic test for the detection of norovirus in faecal specimens", J Clin Virol, 49, pp.254~257 (2010)
  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "User protocol for evaluation of qualitative test performance; approved guideline-second edition. CLSI document EP12-A2" (2008), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
  17. Gray JJ, "European m‘Lticenter evaluation of commercial enzyme immunoassays for detecting norovirus antigen in fecal samples", Clin Vaccine Immunol, 14, pp.1349~1355 (2007)
  18. Okitsu-Negishi S, "Detection of norovirus antigens from recombinant virus-like particles and stool samples by a commercial norovirus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit", J Clin Microbiol, 44, pp.3784~3786 (2006)
  19. Barreira DM, "Viral load and genotypes of noroviruses in symptomatic and asymptomatic children in Southeastern Brazil", J Clin Virol, 47, pp.60~64 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

Evaluation of a New Immunochromatographic Assay Kit for the Rapid Detection of Norovirus in Fecal Specimens권경숙, 김동욱, 남해선, 박귀성, 박준수, 백경아, 빙순혜, 이상한, 최영진대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2012 · 제32권 제1호Epidemiological Analysis of Norovirus Infection between March 2007 and February 2010김재석, 김한성, 김현수, 박동진, 박지영, 송원근, 이규만, 허미나대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2010 · 제30권 제6호Accuracy and Cross-Reactivity of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Norovirus and Rotavirus in a Real Clinical SettingMekmullica Jutarat, Sripirom Napas, Thangjui Sittinun, Titichoatrattana Sittinop대한감염학회 · Infection and Chemotherapy2020 · 제52권 제3호Performance Evaluation of the Automated Fluorescent Immunoassay System Rotavirus Assay in Clinical Samples고대현, 김재석, 김현수, 이수경, 현정원대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2019 · 제39권 제1호Evaluation of an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples김자영, 김재석, 김한성, 김현수, 박경운, 송원근, 이규만, 이선화, 이우창, 홍영준대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2014 · 제34권 제3호로타바이러스 항원 검출을 위한 라텍스응집법, 면역크로마토그래피법 및 효소면역법의 비교이미애, 이선화, 이숙영, 홍종희대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2007 · 제27권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)