Evaluation of the Automated Immunohematology Analyzer DAYMATE M
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: An automated immunohematology analyzer, DAYMATE M (DAY Medical, Switzerland), has been recently developed. The potential of this analyzer to improve test results has been evaluated. Methods: A total of 300 blood samples from Seoul St. Mary’s hospital and Incheon St. Mary’s hospital were tested for ABO and RhD typing. In addition, 336 antibody screening test (AST) samples and 82 patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were included. AST results by DAYMATE M were compared with those obtained by a manual method using DS-Screening II (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Switzerland) and red blood cells from Selectogen (Ortho-Clinical diagnostics Inc., USA). Results: Of the 300 patients enrolled, 87, 73, 79, and 61 had type A, B, O, and AB blood, respectively. The concordance rate was 99.9% for cell typing and 97.0% for serum typing. One discordant case was classified as type B instead of AB, and six discordant serum-typing cases were type A, but classified as type AB. Among the 336 AST samples, the concordance rate was 93.2%. From 136 positive cases, six were discordant. Within the 82 HSCT-treated patients, the concordance rate for ABO blood typing was 92.2%. Among the six discordant cases, DAYMATE M typed four cases as donor type where the standard method typed them as the recipient blood type. Conclusions: The DAYMATE M automated immunohematology analyzer performs reliably for ABO and RhD typing, as well as for ASTs and on samples from patients treated with HSCT.
Abstract
Background: An automated immunohematology analyzer, DAYMATE M (DAY Medical, Switzerland), has been recently developed. The potential of this analyzer to improve test results has been evaluated. Methods: A total of 300 blood samples from Seoul St. Mary’s hospital and Incheon St. Mary’s hospital were tested for ABO and RhD typing. In addition, 336 antibody screening test (AST) samples and 82 patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were included. AST results by DAYMATE M were compared with those obtained by a manual method using DS-Screening II (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Switzerland) and red blood cells from Selectogen (Ortho-Clinical diagnostics Inc., USA). Results: Of the 300 patients enrolled, 87, 73, 79, and 61 had type A, B, O, and AB blood, respectively. The concordance rate was 99.9% for cell typing and 97.0% for serum typing. One discordant case was classified as type B instead of AB, and six discordant serum-typing cases were type A, but classified as type AB. Among the 336 AST samples, the concordance rate was 93.2%. From 136 positive cases, six were discordant. Within the 82 HSCT-treated patients, the concordance rate for ABO blood typing was 92.2%. Among the six discordant cases, DAYMATE M typed four cases as donor type where the standard method typed them as the recipient blood type. Conclusions: The DAYMATE M automated immunohematology analyzer performs reliably for ABO and RhD typing, as well as for ASTs and on samples from patients treated with HSCT.
참고문헌 (18)
- Roback JD, "An automatable format for accurate immunohematology testing by ow cytometry", Transfusion, 43, pp.918~927 (2003)
- Bajpai M, "Automation in Immunohematology", Asian J Transfus Sci, 6, pp.140~144 (2012)
- 신소연, "수혈 전 검사 장비인 AutoVue Innova와 Techno TwinStation의 평가", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 28(3), pp.214~220 (2008), 대한진단검사의학회
- Sturgeon P, "Automation of routine bloodtyping procedures", Vox Sang, 8, pp.438~451 (1963)
- Lapierre Y, "The gel test : a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions", Transfusion, 30, pp.109~113 (1990)
- Sinor LT, "Advances in solid-phase red cell adherence methods and transfusion serology", Transfus Med Rev, 6, pp.26~31 (1992)
- Voak D, "The status of new methods for the detection of red cell agglutination", Transfusion, 39, pp.1037~1040 (1999)
- Duguid JK, "New technology in hospital blood banking", J Clin Pathol, 46, pp.585~588 (1993)
- Casina TS, "In search of the Holy Grail : comparison of antibody screening methods", Immunohematology, 22, pp.196~202 (2006)
- Malomgré W, "Recent and future trends in blood group typing", Anal Bioanal Chem, 393, pp.1443~1451 (2009)
- Tanabe K, "Interinstitutional variation in the measurement of anti-A", B antibodies: the Japanese ABO-Incompatible Transplantation Committee survey, 2007, pp.84, S13~S16
- Validation Task Force of the International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on Information Technology, "ISBT Guidelines for validation of automated systems in blood establishments", Vox Sang, 98, pp.1~19 (2010)
- LA33-A, "Validation of automated systems for immunohematological testing before implementation; approved guidelines. I", pp.2010, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- Fung MK, "Technical manual", pp.371~378 (2014), American Association of Blood Banks
- 장미애, "ABO 및 RhD 혈액형 검사와 항체 선별검사를 위한 혈액은행 자동화장비 Galileo NEO와 QWALYS-3의 평가", 대한수혈학회지, 25(3), pp.235~242 (2014), 대한수혈학회
- 박영춘, "ABO 및 RhD 혈액형 검사와 비예기항체 선별검사를 위한 자동화장비 IH-1000의 평가", 대한수혈학회지, 23(2), pp.127~135 (2012), 대한수혈학회
- 조수연, "Comparative Analysis of Clinical Samples Showing Weak Serum Reaction on AutoVue System Causing ABO Blood Typing Discrepancies", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 37(2), pp.117~123 (2017), 대한진단검사의학회
- Morelati F, "Evaluation of a new automated instrument for pretransfusion testing", Transfusion, 38, pp.959~965 (1998)