21世紀 東아시아 出土資料 硏究 現況과 ‘資料學’의 可能性 ― 古代 東아시아史의 理解를 中心으로 ―
The Recent Studies of Excavated Materials in 21st Century East Asia and the Possibility of “Textual Studies (Charyohak)”
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
My intention in this paper is to search for a possibility for “textual studies (charyohak)” based on the recent studies on excavated materials of East Asia including China, Japan, and Korea. Also, my paper aims at reconsidering excavated materials as resources for understanding the shared cultures of East Asian society by examining the related “diachronic features” of old texts preserved in East Asia. As a premise for solving these critical problems, I, at first, look through the recent tendencies of academics in East Asia. In the case of Korea, there are studies of Korean excavated materials and of Chinese ones. For the former, the excavation of wooden slips at the Sǒngsan(城山) mountain walls of Haman and the formation of The Korean Society for the Study of Wooden Document (2007) have become a turning point of the charyohak studies, which put the emphasis on the “middle” status of Korean wooden documents in transnational cultural interactions among ancient East Asian societies. For the latter, the focus consists in the reconstruction of ancient Chinese history rather than the interpretation of Chinese materials or their evidential studies. The outcome of the studies from the middle 1970s has been concentrated on the examination of the state power or its institutions through the wooden slips of the Qin and Han dynasties. What has been remarkable from the year of 2000 onward is the institutionalization of study through the establishment of academic societies such as The Society for the Study of Jianbo 簡牘 (2005). In the case of China in the 21st century, the main tendency in the academics is to establish specialized academic institutions, to publish academic journals, and to communicate with foreign scholars from abroad through the websites. Similarly, the Japanese academics have also shown interest in more active studies of excavated materials and the reconstruction of academic societies for research collaboration. In particular, it is undeniable that the Japanese study of Korean wooden slips played a significant role in examining cultural interactions among ancient East Asian societies. Through the studies of excavated materials in 21st century East Asia motivated by scholarly interactions with different fields of study, concern for East Asia has been strengthened without being limited by “nationalized” excavated materials. In consequence, interdisciplinary studies become possible, and new academic tendencies concerning East Asia have arisen from the improved research environments for research collaborations. In other words, a new methodology of study transcending “time” and “space” proposed a possibility for the study of charyohak, which may overcome the theory of or discourse of “East Asia” without any substantial entity. Furthermore, interdisciplinary and collaborative research among international academics in the 21st century will rediscover the truth of history. The “realization” of this kind of study in reality will make excavated materials the basis for charyohak as an independent field of study.
Abstract
My intention in this paper is to search for a possibility for “textual studies (charyohak)” based on the recent studies on excavated materials of East Asia including China, Japan, and Korea. Also, my paper aims at reconsidering excavated materials as resources for understanding the shared cultures of East Asian society by examining the related “diachronic features” of old texts preserved in East Asia. As a premise for solving these critical problems, I, at first, look through the recent tendencies of academics in East Asia. In the case of Korea, there are studies of Korean excavated materials and of Chinese ones. For the former, the excavation of wooden slips at the Sǒngsan(城山) mountain walls of Haman and the formation of The Korean Society for the Study of Wooden Document (2007) have become a turning point of the charyohak studies, which put the emphasis on the “middle” status of Korean wooden documents in transnational cultural interactions among ancient East Asian societies. For the latter, the focus consists in the reconstruction of ancient Chinese history rather than the interpretation of Chinese materials or their evidential studies. The outcome of the studies from the middle 1970s has been concentrated on the examination of the state power or its institutions through the wooden slips of the Qin and Han dynasties. What has been remarkable from the year of 2000 onward is the institutionalization of study through the establishment of academic societies such as The Society for the Study of Jianbo 簡牘 (2005). In the case of China in the 21st century, the main tendency in the academics is to establish specialized academic institutions, to publish academic journals, and to communicate with foreign scholars from abroad through the websites. Similarly, the Japanese academics have also shown interest in more active studies of excavated materials and the reconstruction of academic societies for research collaboration. In particular, it is undeniable that the Japanese study of Korean wooden slips played a significant role in examining cultural interactions among ancient East Asian societies. Through the studies of excavated materials in 21st century East Asia motivated by scholarly interactions with different fields of study, concern for East Asia has been strengthened without being limited by “nationalized” excavated materials. In consequence, interdisciplinary studies become possible, and new academic tendencies concerning East Asia have arisen from the improved research environments for research collaborations. In other words, a new methodology of study transcending “time” and “space” proposed a possibility for the study of charyohak, which may overcome the theory of or discourse of “East Asia” without any substantial entity. Furthermore, interdisciplinary and collaborative research among international academics in the 21st century will rediscover the truth of history. The “realization” of this kind of study in reality will make excavated materials the basis for charyohak as an independent field of study.
참고문헌 (113)
- 藤田勝久, "史記戰國史料の硏究" (1997), 東京大學出版會
- 王國維, "最近二三十年中中國新發見之學問, In 簡牘檢署考校注", pp.9~ (2004), 上海古籍出版社
- 朱紅林, "附錄:有關睡虎地秦簡、張家山漢簡的硏究成果, In 張家山漢簡《二年律令》集釋" (2005), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 單育辰, "1900年以來出土簡帛一覽" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 騈宇騫, "論著目錄編, In 二十世紀出土簡帛綜述" (2006), 文物出版社
- 김영욱, "西河原森ノ內遺跡地의 ‘椋直’木簡에 對한 語學的 考察", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- 김창석, "大阪桑津 유적출토 百濟系 木簡의 내용과 용도", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- 尹善泰, "한국고대목간의 출토현황과 전망", 韓國의 古代木簡 (2004), 국립창원문화재연구소
- 尹善泰, "韓國古代木簡の出土現況と展望, In 韓國出土文獻の世界" (2007), 雄山閣
- 李鎔賢, "韓國における木簡硏究の現狀, In 韓國出土文獻の世界" (2007), 雄山閣
- 朱甫敦, "한국 목간 연구의 현황과 전망", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- 韓國의 古代木簡, "朱甫敦", 국립창원문화재연구소, ~ (2004)
- 李基東, "雁鴨池에서 出土된 新羅木簡에 대하여", 慶北史學, 1, pp.115~133 (1979)
- 김영욱, "古代 韓國木簡에 보이는 釋讀表記", 구결연구, (19), pp.172~189 (2007), 구결학회
- 이용현, "목간으로 본 신라의 문자？언어 생활", 구결연구, (18), pp.107~139 (2007), 구결학회
- 李鎔賢, "文字資料로 본 三國時代 言語文字의 展開", 구결연구, (19), pp.191~225 (2007), 구결학회
- 정재영, "月城垓字 149號 木簡에 나타나는 吏讀에 대하여", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- 고광의, "6~7세기 新羅木簡의 書體와 書藝史的 의의", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- 孫煥一, "咸安 城山山城 출토 木簡의 書體에 대한 고찰", 韓國의 古代木簡 (2004), 국립창원문화재연구소
- 富谷至, "목간과 죽간으로 본 중국고대문화사" (2005), 사계절
- 鄭夏賢, "韓國에서의 簡牘 硏究와 中國古代史 理解", 중국고중세사연구, (16), pp.319~331 (2006), 중국고중세사학회
- 이성규, "秦의 土地制度와 齊民支配―雲夢出土秦簡을 통한 商鞅變法의 재검토", 全海宗博士華甲紀念私學論叢 (1979)
- 이성규, "中國古代帝國成立史" (1984), 一潮閣
- 金燁, "雲夢出土秦簡과 漢初의 徵兵年齡", 全海宗博士華甲紀念私學論叢 (1979)
- 李成珪, "里耶秦簡 南陽戶人 戶籍과 秦의 遷徙政策", 중국학보, (57), pp.121~167 (2008), 한국중국학회
- 陳松長, "香港中文大學文物館藏簡牘", 香港中文大學文物館 (2001)
- 이성규, "前漢의 大土地 經營과 奴婢 勞動 ― 香港中文大學文物館所藏 簡牘 『奴婢廩食粟出入簿』의 分析을 중심으로 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (20), pp.1~86 (2008), 중국고중세사학회
- 隸臣妾, "成大史林 4" (1987)
- 辛聖坤, "‘隸臣妾’ 身分에 대한 試論的 考察", 서울大東洋私學科論集 (1985)
- 辛聖坤, "벌금형에 대한 연구【任仲爀, ｢雲夢秦簡의 貲罰에 대하여｣", 東洋史學硏究, 24 (1986)
- 辛聖坤, "士伍신분에 대한 연구【尹在碩, ｢秦代 ‘士伍’에 대하여｣", 慶北史學, 10 (1987)
- 이석명, "백서노자" (2003), 청계
- 梁芳雄, "초간 노자" (2003), 예경
- 김홍경, "노자―삶의 기술, 늙은이의 노래" (2003), 들녘
- 김충열, "김충열 교수의 노자 강의" (2004), 예문서원
- 湖南省文物考古硏究所, "里耶發掘報告" (2007), 岳麓書社
- 尹在碩, "秦簡<日書>에 나타난 ‘室’의 구조와 성격―戰國期 秦의 家族類型 고찰을 위한 시론", 東洋史學硏究, 44 (1993)
- 김경호, "居延漢簡 元康五年詔書冊의 內容과 文書傳達", 중국고중세사연구, (16), pp.41~76 (2006), 중국고중세사학회
- 金秉駿, "漢代의 節日과 地方統治―伏日과 臘日을 중심으로", 東洋史學硏究, 69 (2000)
- 손영종, "낙랑군 남부지역의 위치―‘락랑군 초원4년 현별 호구다소□□｣’ 통계자료를 중심으로", 력사과학, 198 (2006)
- 손영종, "료동지방 전한 군현들의 위치와 그 후의 변천(1)", 력사과학, 199 (2006)
- 윤용구, "새로 발견된 樂浪木簡－樂浪郡 初元四年 縣別戶口簿－", 한국고대사연구, (46), pp.241~264 (2007), 한국고대사학회
- 김병준, "중국고대 簡牘자료를 통해 본 낙랑군의 군현지배", 역사학보, (189), pp.139~173 (2006), 역사학회
- 金秉駿, "樂浪郡 初期의 編戶過程과 ‘胡漢稍別’―｢樂浪郡初元四年縣別戶口多少□□｣木簡을 단서로", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- 李成珪, "중국 군현으로서의 낙랑", 낙랑문화연구 (2006), 동북아역사재단
- 富谷至, "流沙出土の文字資料" (2001), 京都大學出版會
- 小田義久, "大谷文書集成(壹)～(參)" (2003), 法藏館
- 李零, "長沙自彈庫戰國楚帛書硏究" (1985), 中華書局
- 林劍鳴, "簡牘槪述" (1984), 陝西人民出版社
- 鄭有國, "中國簡牘學綜論" (1989), 華東師範大學出版社
- 李學勤, "簡帛佚籍與學術史, In 臺灣時報文化出版企業有限公司" (2001), 江西敎育出版社
- 張顯成, "簡帛文獻學通論" (2004), 中華書局
- 張顯成, "簡帛語言文字硏究(第二輯)" (2006), 巴蜀書社
- 吉仕梅, "簡帛語言硏究" (2004), 巴蜀書社
- 富谷至, "21世紀の秦漢史硏究, In 岩波講座世界歷史", pp.256~257 (1998), 岩波書店
- 富谷至, "二十世紀簡帛學硏究", pp.30~44 (2003), 學苑出版社
- 富谷至, "出土資料學への探究｣について", 中國出土資料硏究, 6, pp.2~3 (2002)
- 騈宇騫, "二十世紀出土簡帛綜述" (2006), 文物出版社
- 初師賓, "中國簡牘集成" (2001), 敦煌文藝出版社
- 長沙市文物考古硏究所, "長沙三國吳簡曁百年來簡帛發現與硏究國際學術硏討會論文集" (2005), 中華書局
- 北京吳簡硏討班, "吳簡硏究 第1輯" (2004), 湖北辭書
- 北京吳簡硏討班, "吳簡硏究 第2輯" (2006), 湖北辭書
- 于振波, "走馬樓吳簡初探" (2004), 文津出版社
- 于振波, "走馬樓吳簡續探" (2007), 文津出版社
- 武漢大學中國文化硏究院, "郭店楚簡國際學術討論會論文集" (2000), 人民出版社
- 艾蘭, "新出簡帛硏究 新出簡帛國際學術硏討會文集" (2004), 文物出版社
- 謝維揚, "新出土文獻與古代文明硏究" (2004), 上海大學出版社
- 長沙市文物考古硏究所, "長沙三國吳簡曁百年來簡帛發現與硏究國際學術硏討會論文集" (2005), 中華書局
- 金燁, "《秦簡》所見之“非公室告”與“家罪”", 中國史硏究, 1 (1990)
- 長沙簡牘博物館, "長沙走馬樓三國吳簡․竹簡 第3卷" (2007), 文物出版社
- 鬼頭淸明, "第1章 木簡硏究の成果と方法", 古代木簡の基礎的硏究 (1993), 塙書房刊
- 東野治之, "第1部 日本木簡の性格", 正倉院文書と木簡の硏究 (1997), 嗃書房
- 大庭脩, "木簡―古代からのメツセ―ジ" (1998), 大修館書店
- 今泉隆雄, "第1章 木簡硏究の成果と課題", 古代木簡の硏究 (1998), 吉川弘文館
- 寺崎保廣, "古代日本の都城と木簡" (2006), 吉川弘文館
- 永田英田, "居延漢簡の硏究" (1989), 同朋舍
- 大庭脩, "漢簡硏究國際シンポジウム’92報告書 漢簡硏究の現狀と展望" (1993), 關西大學出版部
- 大庭脩, "大英圖書館藏敦煌漢簡" (1990), 同朋舍
- 工藤元南, "睡號地秦簡よりみた秦代の國家と社會" (1998), 創文社
- 富谷至, "江陵張家山二四七號墓出土漢律令の硏究, In 論考篇․譯注篇" (2006), 朋友書店
- 池田知久, "大東文化大學上海博楚簡硏究班", 上海博楚簡の硏究(1) (2007)
- 石岡, "出土法律文書と秦漢法制史硏究", 歷史評論, pp.699~ (2008)
- 李成市, "韓國出土の木簡について", 木簡硏究, pp.19~ (1997)
- 橋本繁, "金海出土論語木簡と新羅社會", 朝鮮學報, pp.193~ (2004)
- 朝鮮文化硏究所, "韓國出土文獻の世界" (2007), 雄山閣
- 國立昌原文化財硏究所, "韓國의 古代木簡" (2004), 藝脈出版社
- 平川南, "日本古代木簡 硏究의 現狀과 新視點", 韓國古代史硏究, 19, pp.149~ (2000)
- 李成市, "古代朝鮮の文字文化と日本", 國文學, 47(4), pp.15~ (2002)
- 大庭脩, "木簡―古代からのメツセ―ジ" (1998), 大修館書店
- 今泉隆雄, "第1章 木簡硏究の成果と課題", 古代木簡の硏究, pp.41~ (1998), 吉川弘文館
- 李成市, "古代東アジアの民族と國家" (1998), 岩波書店
- 橋本, "東アジアのおける文字文化の傳播―朝鮮半島出土", 論語, 木簡の檢討を中心に―
- 記念論集刊行會, "古代東アジアの社會と文化(福井重雅先生古稀․退職記念論集)" (2007), 汲古書院
- 沈頌金, "韓國的簡牘硏究, In 二十世紀簡帛學硏究", pp.704~709 (2003), 學苑出版社
- 富谷至, "木簡․竹簡の語る中國古代―書記の文化史" (2003), 岩波書店
- 東野治之, "木簡が語る日本の古代" (1997), 岩波書店
- 尹在碩, "睡虎地秦簡竹簡譯註", 소명출판
- 朱淵淸, "再現的文明..中國出土文獻與傳統學術" (2001), 華東師範大學出版社
- 謝桂華, "중국에서 출토된 魏晋代 이후의 漢文簡紙文書와 城山山城 출토 木簡", 한국고대사연구, 19, pp.191~203 (2000)
- 尹在碩, "《二年律令與奏讞書》에 대하여", 木簡과 文字, (창간), pp.392~393 (2008)
- 三上喜孝, "일본 고대 목간의 계보", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- 張娜麗, "西域出土文書の基礎的硏究―中國古代における小學書․童蒙書の諸相―" (2006), 汲告書院
- 橋本, "金海出土", 論語 (2004), 木簡と新羅社會
- 橋本, "古代朝鮮における", 論語 (2007), 受容再論
- 橋本, "東アジアのおける文字文化の傳播―朝鮮半島出土", 論語 (2007), 木簡の檢討を中心に―
- 李慶, "關於定州漢墓竹簡《論語》的幾個問題―《論語》的文獻學探討", 中國典籍與文化論叢, 8 (2005)
- 長沙市文物考古硏究所, "長沙東牌樓東漢簡牘" (2006), 文物出版社
- 何玆全, "簡牘學與歷史學", 簡帛硏究, 1, pp.2~3 (1993)
- 高敏, "略談簡牘硏究與簡牘學的關係和區別, In 秦漢魏晋南北朝史論考" (2004), 中國社會科學出版社
- 長沙市文物考古硏究所, "長沙東牌樓東漢簡牘", pp.107~108 (2006), 文物出版社
- 김경호, "이천년 전 里耶鎭으로의 旅程과 『里耶秦簡』 簡介", 중국고중세사연구, (19), pp.347~382 (2008), 중국고중세사학회
- 李均明, "韓中簡牘 비교연구", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008), 한국목간학회
- 彭浩, "二年律令與奏讞書" (2007), 上海古籍出版社