韓國 古代木簡 보이는 몇 가지 형태적 특징 ― 中國 古代木簡과의 비교를 중심으로 ―
The Study on Ancient Korean Wooden Strip their Shapes - Comparative Study with Chinese Wooden Strip -
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The total numbers of 617 pieces of Ancient wooden strip has been excavated except the ones listed in the Ancient Wooden Strip with Inscription in Korea(韓國의 古代木簡). Out of these, it is estimated that ancient letters are found in about 350 pieces. We can distinguish them in two categories in terms of the shapes and the writing styles described in them. First, there are critical differences in their shapes and the period of their uses. The Korean ancient wooden strips, used together with paper around 6-7 A.C., have totally different shapes with Chinese ones which usually present the shape of file wooden strip(編綴簡). Considering the shapes and writing styles of wooden strips excavated up until now, we can hardly expect to have more excavations of “file(編綴)” shaped wooden strips in the future. In aspects of contents, they are single wooden strip(單獨簡) categorized in sign post(楬)” such as name register(名籍類) or list of goods(荷札類). Therefore, we can assume that they are closely related with low class administrative service. We hardly see the use of punctuation sign(符號) in the description comparing with Chinese wooden scroll. In addition, the position of its title is distinguishable. It is flexible depending on the purpose of authors in the Chinese wooden scroll found in jin, han age. Meanwhile, the titles are always positioned in the first line of the first page in Korean wooden strips. We believe that this feature is affected by the writing format of paper. Second, the wooden strip represents the social lives of Korean people in those times. The Wolseong(月城) wooden strip and the Sungsan(城山) Haman(咸安) fortress wall wooden strip found at Silla(新羅) provides the substantial evidences of understanding the flows of goods between capital and local provinces. I sense that the current studies do not seem to fully analyze the structural and social characteristics of the strips excavated so far. The further excavations of strips without new contents and shapes might discourage researcher’s academic passion on the field. In this paper, I present the importance of the publication of dictionary in order to thrive the studies on Korean wooden strips. Publication of dictionary is fundamental of accurate understanding of Korean wooden strips, even it helps to study on Chinese or Japanese wooden strips. One of critical problems of current studies of Korean wooden strips is that they are researched by individuals without any commonly agreed encyclopedia which inevitably results in the arbitrary or subjective interpretation. Publication of encyclopedia of Korean wooden strip eliminates the mistranslation. Comparative shape studies between Japanese, Chinese and Korean wooden strips can be the preliminary study. However, the publication of encyclopedia is more advanced than the simple comparative study, which can take a crucial role in Ancient Korean wooden strip study. Even though the number of Korean wooden strips excavated so far is smaller than the ones of Chinese and Japanese, the publication of structured and organized encyclopedia will provide a stable historical status with the characteristics of Korean wooden strips as the “bridge” in Ancient East Asian society. We can clearly establish the communicative structure and commonalities in Ancient East Asian society through the Korean wooden strips.
Abstract
The total numbers of 617 pieces of Ancient wooden strip has been excavated except the ones listed in the Ancient Wooden Strip with Inscription in Korea(韓國의 古代木簡). Out of these, it is estimated that ancient letters are found in about 350 pieces. We can distinguish them in two categories in terms of the shapes and the writing styles described in them. First, there are critical differences in their shapes and the period of their uses. The Korean ancient wooden strips, used together with paper around 6-7 A.C., have totally different shapes with Chinese ones which usually present the shape of file wooden strip(編綴簡). Considering the shapes and writing styles of wooden strips excavated up until now, we can hardly expect to have more excavations of “file(編綴)” shaped wooden strips in the future. In aspects of contents, they are single wooden strip(單獨簡) categorized in sign post(楬)” such as name register(名籍類) or list of goods(荷札類). Therefore, we can assume that they are closely related with low class administrative service. We hardly see the use of punctuation sign(符號) in the description comparing with Chinese wooden scroll. In addition, the position of its title is distinguishable. It is flexible depending on the purpose of authors in the Chinese wooden scroll found in jin, han age. Meanwhile, the titles are always positioned in the first line of the first page in Korean wooden strips. We believe that this feature is affected by the writing format of paper. Second, the wooden strip represents the social lives of Korean people in those times. The Wolseong(月城) wooden strip and the Sungsan(城山) Haman(咸安) fortress wall wooden strip found at Silla(新羅) provides the substantial evidences of understanding the flows of goods between capital and local provinces. I sense that the current studies do not seem to fully analyze the structural and social characteristics of the strips excavated so far. The further excavations of strips without new contents and shapes might discourage researcher’s academic passion on the field. In this paper, I present the importance of the publication of dictionary in order to thrive the studies on Korean wooden strips. Publication of dictionary is fundamental of accurate understanding of Korean wooden strips, even it helps to study on Chinese or Japanese wooden strips. One of critical problems of current studies of Korean wooden strips is that they are researched by individuals without any commonly agreed encyclopedia which inevitably results in the arbitrary or subjective interpretation. Publication of encyclopedia of Korean wooden strip eliminates the mistranslation. Comparative shape studies between Japanese, Chinese and Korean wooden strips can be the preliminary study. However, the publication of encyclopedia is more advanced than the simple comparative study, which can take a crucial role in Ancient Korean wooden strip study. Even though the number of Korean wooden strips excavated so far is smaller than the ones of Chinese and Japanese, the publication of structured and organized encyclopedia will provide a stable historical status with the characteristics of Korean wooden strips as the “bridge” in Ancient East Asian society. We can clearly establish the communicative structure and commonalities in Ancient East Asian society through the Korean wooden strips.
참고문헌 (121)
- "古代 中國의 公․私文書 流通과 帝國秩序", 中國古中世史學會 제3회 국제학술토론회 (2008), 충북대
- "東아시아 資料學의 可能性 摸索―出土資料를 中心으로", (成均館大學校 東ASIA學術院 인문한국사업단 국제학술회의 (2008), 성균관대
- "古․中世 中國의 出土文物과 統治政策", 제159회 중국고중세사학회 정기발표회 (2008), 경북대 인문대학
- "동아시아 고대목간의 형태", 한국목간학회 제3회 국제학술회의 (2008), 경북대
- 王國維, "簡牘檢署考校注 In: 最近二三十年中中國新發見之學問", pp.9~ (2004), 上海古籍出版社
- 김경호, "21世紀 東아시아 出土資料 硏究 現況과 ‘資料學’의 可能性 ― 古代 東아시아史의 理解를 中心으로 ―", 사림, (31), pp.1~38 (2008), 수선사학회
- 李成市, "古代朝鮮の文字文化と日本", 國文學, 47(4), pp.15~ (2002)
- 工藤元南, "東アジア古代出土文字資料の硏究" (2009), 雄山閣
- 李成市, "韓國古代木簡硏究の現在―新羅木簡硏究の成果を中心に"
- 尹善泰, "木簡からみた漢字文化の受容と變容"
- 三上喜孝, "古代東アジア出擧制度試論"
- 橋本 繁, "城山山城木簡と六世紀新羅の地方支配"
- 平川 南, "道祖神信仰の源流―古代の道の祭祀と陽物木製品から"
- 安部聰一郞, "중국출토간독과의 비교연구―尼雅출토 한문간독을 중심으로"
- 三上喜孝, "함안 성산산성 출토목간 의의 In: 일본고대목간에서 본 함안 성산산성목간의 특징" (2007), 국립가야문화재연구소
- 謝桂華, "居延漢簡釋文合校" (1987), 文物出版社
- 今泉隆雄, "古代木簡の硏究 In: 第1章 木簡硏究の成果と課題", pp.41~ (1998), 吉川弘文館
- 東野治之, "正倉院文書と木簡の硏究 In: 奈良平安時代の文獻に現われた木簡, 成選短冊と平城宮出土の考選木簡" (1997), 嗃書房
- 李成珪, "韓國 古代 國家의 形成과 文字 受容", 한국고대사연구, 32 (2003)
- 고광의, "高句麗 古墳壁畵에 나타난 書寫 관련 내용 검토", 한국고대사연구, 34, pp.225~266 (2004), 한국고대사학회
- 윤선태, "百濟의 文書行政과 木簡", 한국고대사연구, (48), pp.303~334 (2007), 한국고대사학회
- 윤선태, "목간으로 본 한자문화의 수용과 변용", 신라문화, 32(32), pp.177~198 (2008), 신라문화연구소
- 李成市, "古代東アジアの民族と國家" (1998), 岩波書店
- 朝鮮文化硏究所, "韓國出土文獻の世界" (2007), 雄山閣
- 김영욱, "西河原森ノ內遺跡地의 ‘椋直’木簡에 對한 語學的 考察", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008), 한국목간학회
- 김창석, "大阪桑津 유적출토 百濟系 木簡의 내용과 용도", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008), 한국목간학회
- 謝桂華, "중국에서 출토된 魏晋代 이후의 漢文簡紙文書와 城山山城 출토 木簡", 한국고대사연구, 19 (2000)
- 李均明, "韓中簡牘의 비교연구", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008), 한국목간학회
- 陸錫興, "漢代簡牘草字編" (1989), 上海書畫
- 曾憲通, "長沙楚帛書文字編" (1993), 中華書局
- 張守中, "睡虎地秦簡文字編" (1994), 文物出版社
- 李守奎, "上海博物館藏戰國楚竹書文字編(一～五)" (2007), 作家出版社
- 沈剛, "居延―漢簡語詞匯釋" (2008), 科學出版社
- 木簡学会, "日本古代木簡選" (1990), 岩波書店
- 児玉幸多, "くずし字用例辞典-普及版" (1993), 東京堂出版
- 法書会, "五體字類-普及版" (2001), 西東書房
- 奈良文化財研究所, "日本古代木簡字典" (2008), ヤギ書店
- 류병홍, "고고학 분야에서 이룩한 성과", 조선고고연구, pp.2~ (1992)
- 黃壽永, "佛國寺三層石塔 舍利具와 文武大王海中陵 In: 佛國寺三層石塔發見 無垢淨光陀羅尼經―新羅塔의 所依經典―" (1997), 韓國精神文化硏究院
- 朝鮮古蹟硏究會, "樂浪彩篋塚", pp.57~58 (1934)
- 韓國古代社會硏究所, "譯註 韓國古代金石文 제1권", 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院, pp.446~447 (1992)
- 손영종, "낙랑군 남부지역(후의 대방군지역)의 위치 ―《낙랑군 초원4년 현별호구다소□□》통계자료를 중심으로", 역사과학, 198 (2006)
- 윤용구, "새로 발견된 樂浪木簡－樂浪郡 初元四年 縣別戶口簿－", 한국고대사연구, (46), pp.241~264 (2007), 한국고대사학회
- 金秉駿, "樂浪郡 初期의 編戶過程과 ‘胡漢稍別―｢樂浪郡初元四年縣別戶口多少□□｣木簡을 단서로", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008)
- "전한후기 낙랑군의 호구파악―樂浪郡初元四年縣別戶口多少□簿」를 중심으로-", 한국목간학회 제5회 연구발표회 발표문 (2009), 동국대학교
- 李健茂, "茶戶里遺蹟出土 붓(筆)에 대하여", 考古學誌, 4 (1992)
- 尹善泰, "韓國의 古代木簡 In: 한국고대목간의 출토현황과 전망", pp.356~ (2004)
- 이승률, "나무속 암호, 목간 In: 중국의 목간" (2009), 예맥출판사
- 박종익, "한국의 고대목간 In: 목간은 무엇인가", pp.11~ (2006), 國立昌原文化財硏究所
- 錢存訓, "書於竹帛―中國古代的文字記錄", pp.73~ (2004), 上海書店出版社
- 金允子, "中國古代書史", pp.102~ (1990), 東門選
- 四川省博物館, "靑川縣出土秦更修田律木牘", 文物 (1982)
- 于豪亮, "釋靑川秦墓木牘", 文物 (1982)
- 林劍鳴, "靑川秦墓木牘內容探討", 考古與文物 (1982)
- 湖南省文物考古硏究所, "里耶發掘報告" (2006), 岳麓書社
- 長沙市文物考古硏究所, "(1)～(3)" (2003), 文物出版社
- "天志中", pp.306~ (1993), 中華書局
- 陳奇猷, "呂氏春秋校釋 In: 仲春紀․情欲", pp.86~ (1984), 學林出版社
- 이승률, "서사재료의 관점에서 본 간백Ⅰ", 오늘의 동양사상, (17) (2007)
- "서사재료의 관점에서 본 간백Ⅱ―백서", 오늘의 동양사상, (18) (2008)
- 森鹿三, "竹と中國文化", 東光, (1) (1947)
- 富谷 至, "木簡․竹簡の語る中國古代―書記の文化史", pp.97~ (2003), 岩波書店
- 湖北省博物館, "書寫歷史―戰國秦漢簡牘", pp.16~ (2007), 文物出版社
- 濮茅左, ""孔子詩論"の整理と硏究", 日本科學硏究費 ｢兩漢儒敎の新硏究｣ 국제심포지움 발표논문, pp.193~ (2007)
- 이승률, "서사재료의 관점에서 본 간백Ⅲ", 오늘의 동양사상, (19) (2008)
- 湖北省博物館, "書寫歷史―戰國秦漢簡牘", pp.16~ (2007)
- 大庭脩, "木簡學入門", pp.39~40 (1984), 講談社
- "劉序 In: 皆定以殺靑書 可繕寫"
- "吳祐傳", pp.2099~
- 이승률, "서사재료의 관점에서 본 간백Ⅰ", 오늘의 동양사상, (17), pp.263~282 (2007)
- 許愼, "說文解字 In: 第五 上", pp.96~ (1963), 中華書局
- "文帝紀", pp.424~
- 謝桂華, "居延漢簡釋文合校, 居延漢簡", pp.113~ (1987), 文物出版社
- "吉林師範大學學報 In: 說“書契”", pp.83~84 (2003), 人文社會科學版
- "百官․二", pp.3581~
- 籾山 明, "刻齒簡牘初探―漢簡形態論のために―", 木簡硏究, (17) (1995)
- "秦簡 In: 秦律十八種․內史雜"
- 連雲港市博物館, "尹灣漢墓簡牘 In: 中國社會科學院簡帛硏究中心" (1997), 中華書局
- "後漢書", ~
- "三國志․魏書", ~
- 富谷至, "流沙出土の文字資料―樓蘭․尼雅文書を中心に In: 3世紀から4世紀にかけての書寫材料の變遷―樓蘭出土文字資料を中心に―" (2001), 京都大學學術出版會
- "太平御覽 권606"
- 邢義田, "英國國家圖書館藏斯坦因所獲未刊漢文簡牘 In: 英國國家圖書館藏明代木牘試釋" (2007), 上海辭書出版社
- 임경희, "태안 청자운반선 출토 고려 목간의 현황과 내용", 木簡과 文字, (창간) (2008), 한국목간학회
- "三國史記 In: 高句麗本紀"
- 윤선태, "한국고대목간의 형태와 종류", 역사와 현실, (65), pp.157~185 (2007), 한국역사연구회
- 이용현, "韓國木簡基礎硏究" (2006), 신서원
- 박종익, "함안 성산산성 발굴조사와 출토목간의 성격", pp.165~ (2007), 국립가야문화재연구소
- 秦簡, "封珍式", pp.148~
- "居延漢簡", pp.343~
- 韓國古代社會硏究所, "慶州 南山新城碑" (1992), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- 부산대학교 박물관, "金海鳳凰洞. 低濕地 遺蹟", pp.52~58 (2007)
- 河北省文物硏究所定州漢墓竹簡整理小組, "定州漢墓竹簡 論語" (1997), 文物出版社
- 尹在碩, "중국출토 "論語" 簡牘에 대하여", 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원 동아시아자료학연구회 발표문 (2008)
- 李成市, "韓國木簡연구의 현황과 咸安城山山城출토의 木簡", 한국고대사연구, 19, pp.107~ (2000)
- 池田 溫, "中國古代籍帳硏究", pp.146~ (1979), 東京大學東洋文化硏究所
- 이경섭, "함안 성산산성 출토 제첨축(題籤軸)과 고대 동아시아세계의 문서표지(文書標識) 목간", 역사와 현실, (65), pp.187~221 (2007), 한국역사연구회
- 中國簡牘集成編輯委員會, "圖版選 卷下", pp.3~ (2001), 敦煌文藝出版社
- 甘肅省考古文物硏究所, "居延新簡", pp.23~ (1990), 文物出版社
- 大庭 脩, "大英圖書館藏敦煌漢簡" (1990), 同朋社
- "居延新簡", ~
- 中國簡牘集成編輯委員會, "圖版選 卷上" (2001), 敦煌文藝出版社
- 長沙市文物考古硏究所, "長沙東牌樓東漢簡牘" (2006), 文物出版社
- 張顯成, "簡帛文獻學通論" (2004), 中華書局
- 彭浩, "二年律令與奏讞書" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
- 富谷至, "江陵張家山二四七號墓出土漢律令の硏究(論考篇․譯註篇)" (2006), 朋友書店
- 高大倫, "張家山漢簡《脈書》校釋" (1992), 成都出版社
- 彭浩, "張家山漢簡《算數書》註釋" (2001), 科學出版社
- 邵鴻, "張家山漢簡《蓋廬》硏究" (2007), 文物出版社
- 高大倫, "張家山漢簡《引書》硏究" (1995), 巴蜀書社
- 百濟木簡―소장품조사자료집, "백제목간", pp.2008, 국립부여박물관
- 近藤浩一, "夫餘 陵山里 羅城築造 木簡의 硏究", 百濟硏究, 39, pp.98~103
- 윤선태, "목간으로 본 한자문화의 수용과 변용", 신라문화, 32(32), pp.177~198 (2008), 신라문화연구소
- 윤선태, "百濟의 文書行政과 木簡", 한국고대사연구, (48), pp.303~334 (2007), 한국고대사학회
- 이병호, "부여 능산리 출토 목간의 성격", 木簡과 文字, (창간), pp.76~85 (2008)
- 國立昌原文化財硏究所, "韓國의 古代木簡", pp.209~210 (2006), 예맥출판사
- 百濟木簡―소장품조사자료집, "백제목간", pp.2008, 국립부여박물관
- 張顯成, "簡帛制度", pp.179~214 (2004)
- 金秉駿, "簡帛의 標記符號를 통해 본 고대인들의 책읽기", 중국고중세사학회 제160회 정례학술발표회 발표문 (2008), 성균관대
- 국립창원문화재연구소, "韓國의 古代木簡(개정판)", pp.44~ (2006), 예맥출판사
- 김성범, "동아시아 고대목간의 형태 In: 羅州 伏岩里 遺蹟 出土 百濟木簡과 其他 銘文遺物", 한국 목간학회 제3회 국제학술대회, pp.32~37 (2008)