본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

胎室 石物의 미술사적 계승과 변천

Art historical succession and change of stone figures for Taesil

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Many stone structures were used while umbilical cord was buried underground occurring from birth of children in royal family. Such stone structures were made and changed in a regular pattern. This writing paid attention to that aspect. Namely, Agibi built by Agitaesil can be divided into Gyusuhyeong and Hayeophyeong, and they were built with influence of tombstones at late Goryeo and early Joseon. The central stone figures of Agitaesil appeared only in Taesil of Seongju Seongseoksan and it seems to have correlation with top part on the five-story stone pagoda of Magoksa, which was influenced by pagoda of Yuan Dynasty. The pedestal shape of tombstone in Gabongbi of Gabongtaesil became head of a dragon as the tombstone of Muyeolwangneung in Silla dynasty went through late Silla and early Goryeo, and turtle shape reappeared in Joseon dynasty and then, such aspect also appeared in Gabongbi. It is believed that stylobate parts of central stone structures for the king Jeongjong and the king Taejong were borrowed from Jigong and Naong of Hoiamsa as well as Hamheobudo of Hyeondeungsa and that central stones and roof stones were also influenced by Budo continuing from Jigong→Naong→Muhak. It is thought that Budo of Jigong was also influenced by round shape of central stones of pagodas built in Banggwangsa of Jeolgangseong, Yeongamsa of Sandongseong. In late Joseon, Gilsangmun was carved in central stone for Gabongtaesil of the king Jeongjo, and it seems that central stone of Taesil was decorated and that importance of Taesil was emphasized during arrangement of Gilsangmun. It is thought that Nanganseok was influenced by Nanganseok of royal tombs continuously installed since Silla dynasty and Gongminwangreung in Goryeo dynasty. In the meantime, the subject regarding origin and change of stone figures for Gabongtaesil has not received attention. It is expected that this study will be a help to research on stone figures for Taesil.

Abstract

Many stone structures were used while umbilical cord was buried underground occurring from birth of children in royal family. Such stone structures were made and changed in a regular pattern. This writing paid attention to that aspect. Namely, Agibi built by Agitaesil can be divided into Gyusuhyeong and Hayeophyeong, and they were built with influence of tombstones at late Goryeo and early Joseon. The central stone figures of Agitaesil appeared only in Taesil of Seongju Seongseoksan and it seems to have correlation with top part on the five-story stone pagoda of Magoksa, which was influenced by pagoda of Yuan Dynasty. The pedestal shape of tombstone in Gabongbi of Gabongtaesil became head of a dragon as the tombstone of Muyeolwangneung in Silla dynasty went through late Silla and early Goryeo, and turtle shape reappeared in Joseon dynasty and then, such aspect also appeared in Gabongbi. It is believed that stylobate parts of central stone structures for the king Jeongjong and the king Taejong were borrowed from Jigong and Naong of Hoiamsa as well as Hamheobudo of Hyeondeungsa and that central stones and roof stones were also influenced by Budo continuing from Jigong→Naong→Muhak. It is thought that Budo of Jigong was also influenced by round shape of central stones of pagodas built in Banggwangsa of Jeolgangseong, Yeongamsa of Sandongseong. In late Joseon, Gilsangmun was carved in central stone for Gabongtaesil of the king Jeongjo, and it seems that central stone of Taesil was decorated and that importance of Taesil was emphasized during arrangement of Gilsangmun. It is thought that Nanganseok was influenced by Nanganseok of royal tombs continuously installed since Silla dynasty and Gongminwangreung in Goryeo dynasty. In the meantime, the subject regarding origin and change of stone figures for Gabongtaesil has not received attention. It is expected that this study will be a help to research on stone figures for Taesil.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 국립문화재연구소, "國譯 胎封謄錄", ~ (2006)
  2. 국립문화재연구소, "국역 안태등록" (2007), 민속원
  3. 국립문화재연구소, "조선왕실의 안태와 태실관련 의궤" (2006), 민속원
  4. 이은식, "세종대왕 단종대왕 태실의궤" (2000), 사천문화원
  5. 李王職, "胎封(藏書閣 所藏)", ~
  6. 경기도박물관, "경기 묘제 석조미술 上", 조선전기, ~ (2007)
  7. 金性經, "중국불교의 여로 하" (1986), 민족문화
  8. 성주 태종ㆍ단종태실 학술(지표) 결과보고서, "대동문화재연구원", ~ (2012)
  9. 李周煥, "朝鮮의 胎室 ⅠㆍⅡ" (1999), 전주이씨대동종약원
  10. 聖林文化財硏究院, "醴泉 鳴鳳里 朝鮮王朝 胎室(文宗ㆍ莊祖) 遺蹟", ~ (2014)
  11. 고명지, "고려 범종의 장식 요소 연구", 석사, 한국미술사, pp.2006
  12. 金包光, "片雲塔과 後百濟의 年號", 佛敎史와 佛敎, 49 (1928), 불교사
  13. 金元龍, "唐朝의 舍利塔", 考古美術, 33 (1963), 고고미술동인회
  14. 박경식, "唐 鳩摩羅什浮屠와 新羅 石造浮屠의 比較 考察", 동양학, (45), pp.185~212 (2009), 동양학연구원
  15. 배재훈, "片雲和尙浮圖를 통해 본 實相山門과 甄萱政權", 백제연구, (50), pp.201~234 (2009), 백제연구소
  16. 신라오악종합학술조사단, "세종ㆍ단종대왕의 태실조사", 考古美術, 85 (1967), 한국미술사학회
  17. 심현용, "조선 왕실의 아기태실비에 대한 양식과 편년 재검토", 대구사학, 116, pp.103~169 (2014), 대구사학회
  18. 심현용, "조선시대 가봉태실의 中央胎石에 대한 양식과 변천", 대구사학, 113, pp.99~142 (2013), 대구사학회
  19. 심현용, "朝鮮時代 胎室에 관한 考古學的 硏究", 박사, pp.2015
  20. 엄기표, "新羅 石造浮屠와 中國 唐代 僧墓塔의 比較 硏究", 동양학, (43), pp.205~235 (2008), 동양학연구원
  21. 鄭炳三, "實相寺 片雲和尙浮圖", 譯註 韓國古代金石文, 3 (1992), 한국고대사회연구소
  22. 鄭永鎬, "中國 草堂寺의 鳩摩羅什 舍利塔", 亞細亞文化硏究, 1 (1996), 경원대아세아문화연구소
  23. 鄭恩雨, "高麗後期 喇嘛塔形 舍利具 硏究", 東岳美術史學, 3 (2002), 동악미술사학회
  24. 趙俸進, "朝鮮前期 球形浮屠의 始原에 관한 考察 : 檜巖寺址浮屠를 中心으로", 석사, 고고미술사학, pp.1991
  25. 홍성익, "浮屠形 佛舍利塔에 대한 연구", 전북사학, (43), pp.53~84 (2013), 전북사학회
  26. 洪性益, "原州市 大德里 胎室에 대하여", 江原文化史硏究, 9 (2004), 강원향토문화연구회
  27. 홍성익, "조선시대 胎室의 역사고고학적 연구", 영남학, (27), pp.7~51 (2015), 영남문화연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)