에드워드 사이드(Edward W. Said)의 오리엔탈리즘 분석과 재현(representation)
Edward W. Said’s Analysis of Orientalism and Representation
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempts to clarify the problematic of Edward W. Said’s critical work on Orientalism by examining his analysis through the concept of “representation.” Analyzing Orientalism as a process of ‘formation’ or ‘transformation’ of representation, Said shows that the modern Europe produced various descriptions and representations related to the Orient in its proper style where the Orient could be constructed as an essential ‘Other’ in opposite characteristics to the European societies. Said’s analysis of Orientalism tries to focus on the fact that Orientalism is a discursive formation composed of various aspects rather than to make a criticism that Orientalist representations distorted a real Orient. It is true that Orientalism is more related to the Occident than to the Orient in that the Modern Europe establishes self identity called ‘modernity’ by constructing its proper Other named Orient. In this case, the Orient is essentially distinguished from itself in nature. This article examines Said’s analysis of Orientalism based on the concept of ‘representation,’ confirming a historical fact that Orientalism discourse has actually established Modern European self-identity while observing, describing, defining, governing, and namely orientalizing the Orient in its interest.
Abstract
This article attempts to clarify the problematic of Edward W. Said’s critical work on Orientalism by examining his analysis through the concept of “representation.” Analyzing Orientalism as a process of ‘formation’ or ‘transformation’ of representation, Said shows that the modern Europe produced various descriptions and representations related to the Orient in its proper style where the Orient could be constructed as an essential ‘Other’ in opposite characteristics to the European societies. Said’s analysis of Orientalism tries to focus on the fact that Orientalism is a discursive formation composed of various aspects rather than to make a criticism that Orientalist representations distorted a real Orient. It is true that Orientalism is more related to the Occident than to the Orient in that the Modern Europe establishes self identity called ‘modernity’ by constructing its proper Other named Orient. In this case, the Orient is essentially distinguished from itself in nature. This article examines Said’s analysis of Orientalism based on the concept of ‘representation,’ confirming a historical fact that Orientalism discourse has actually established Modern European self-identity while observing, describing, defining, governing, and namely orientalizing the Orient in its interest.
참고문헌 (35)
- Said, Edward W., "Vico on the Discipline of Bodies and Texts", MLN, 91(5) (1976)
- Said, Edward W., "오리엔탈리즘" (2000), 교보문고
- Said, Edward W., "문화와 제국주의" (1995), 창
- Said, Edward W., "권력과 지성인" (2011), 창
- Said, Edward W, "저항의 인문학: 인문주의와 민주적 비판" (2012), 마티
- Said, Edward W., "An Ideology of Difference", Critical Inquiry, 12(1) (1985)
- Said, Edward W., "Invention, Memory, and Place", Critical Inquiry, 26(2) (2000)
- Said, Edward W., "Globalizing Literary Study", PMLA, 116(14) (2001)
- "Vingt-cinq ans après la publication de « L’Orientalisme » : L’humanisme, dernier rempart contre la barbarie" (2003)[URL]
- Flaubert, Gustave, "Bouvard et Pécuchet, in OEuvre II" (1953), Gallimard
- "Dictionnaire universel contenant généralement tous les mots françois, tant vieux que modernes, et les termes de toutes les sciences et des arts, La Haye, A. et R. Leers, 1690(posthume, avec une préface de Pierre Bayle)"[URL]
- 김태환, "역사는 왜 미메시스가 아닌가? - 아리스토텔레스의 ‘미메시스’ 개념에 대한 연구", 독일어문화권연구, (25), pp.59~97 (2016), 독일어문화권연구소
- 김현식, "유랑과 저항, 그리고 해방과 공존: 사이드의 ‘지식인'", 역사학보, (224), pp.397~424 (2014), 역사학회[DOI]
- 김현식, "사이드의 인문학과 인문주의: 계몽과 해방을 향한 수용과 저항의 '문헌학'", 서양사론, (132), pp.206~238 (2017), 한국서양사학회
- 김현식, "사이드의 ‘인문학적 해석학’에 대한 비판적 논고", 역사학보, (234), pp.341~375 (2017), 역사학회[DOI]
- 박홍규, "우리 안의 괴물들, ｢로빈스 크루소와 오리엔탈리즘｣", 중등우리교육, 162 (2003)
- Auerbach, Eric, "미메시스" (1999), 민음사
- Barthèlemy, Guy, "Images de l’Orient au XIXe siècle" (1992), Bertrand-Lacoste
- Barthèlemy, Guy, "Fromentin et l’écriture du désert" (1997), L’Harmattan
- Bernard, Anna, "Rhetorics of Belonging: Nation, Narration, and Israel" (2013), Liverpool University Press
- Brisson, Thomas, "Après l’orientalisme: L’Orient créé par l’Orient" (2011), IISMM – KARTHALA
- Chambers, Iain, "sous la direction de Sonia DAYAN-HERZBRUM, Edward Said théoricien critique, Tumultes, N° 35, novembre" (2010), Éditions Kimé
- Hall, Catherine, "Edward Said", History Workshop Journal, (57) (2004)
- Heristchi, Claire, "The Politics of Dispossession, Belonging, and Hope: Remembering Edward W. Said", Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 30(3) (2005)
- Levallois, Michel, "L’orientalisme des saint-simoniens" (2006), Maisonneuve & Larose
- Marin, Louis, "De la représentation", pp.1994, Gallimard
- Mufti, Aamir R., "Auerbach in Istanbul : Edward Said, Secular Criticism, and the Question of MinorityCulture", Critical Inquiry, 25(1) (1998)
- Munslow, Alun, "Deconstructing History" (1997), Routledge
- O’Hara, Daniel, "Criticism Worldly and Otherworldly: Edward W. Said and the Cult of Theory", Boundary, 12(3) (1984)
- O’Riley, Michael, "Specters of Orientalism in France, Algerie, and Postcolonial Studies", Mosaic(Winnipeg), 34 (2001)
- Ricoeur, Paul, "시간과 이야기" (1999), 문학과지성사
- Rubin, Andrew N., "Edward W. Said", Arab Studies Quarterly, 26(4) (2004)
- Quinn, Frederick, "The French Overseas Empire" (2000), PRAEGER
- Savarése, Eric, "L’Ordre colonial et sa légitimation en France métropolitaine. Oublier l’Autre" (1998), L’Harmattan
- Windschuttle, Keith, "Edward Said’s “Orientalism” revisited", New Criterion, 17(5) (1999)