明初 三萬衛 소속 주션인 軍官의 존재형태 — 開原事變과 그 관계자를 중심으로 —
A Study on the Jurchen Military Officers of Sanwan-Wei in the Early Ming
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to analyze the genealogy and activities of Jurchen military officers involved in the Kaiyuan Incident that occurred in the early 15th century, in order to clarify the state of Sanwan-wei in the early Ming dynasty. At the Kaiyuan Incident, which was triggered directly by the abuse of senior officers, the actions taken by Jurchen military officers belonging to Sanwan-wei were the opposite. The behavioral pattern can be divided into two groups. One group revolted directly against their senior officials' abuse. On the contrary, there was another group that tried to take sides with Ming and control the rebellion. Both were similar in that they descended from Jurchen, but their actions at Kaiyuan Incident were in contrast. In order to examine the reasons for these different behaviors, I used the ‘Sanwan-weixuanbu’ which contains information such as succession, change, appointment and dismissal, promotion and demotion of the military officers belonging to the Sanwan-wei. Then, I tried to reconstruct the genealogy and behavior pattern of the persons related to the Kaiyuan Incident using this historical material. As a result, it became clear that two groups with different backgrounds coexisted in Sanwan-wei at that time. In other words, Sanwan-Wei in the early Ming period had a group of senior members who managed other Jurchen peoples while cooperating with the Ming dynasty, while on the other hand, there was a group of newcomers who were managed. In short, it can be said that the rule of the Ming dynasty over Sanwan-wei was realized through the group negotiating with the Ming dynasty and Jurchen.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the genealogy and activities of Jurchen military officers involved in the Kaiyuan Incident that occurred in the early 15th century, in order to clarify the state of Sanwan-wei in the early Ming dynasty. At the Kaiyuan Incident, which was triggered directly by the abuse of senior officers, the actions taken by Jurchen military officers belonging to Sanwan-wei were the opposite. The behavioral pattern can be divided into two groups. One group revolted directly against their senior officials' abuse. On the contrary, there was another group that tried to take sides with Ming and control the rebellion. Both were similar in that they descended from Jurchen, but their actions at Kaiyuan Incident were in contrast. In order to examine the reasons for these different behaviors, I used the ‘Sanwan-weixuanbu’ which contains information such as succession, change, appointment and dismissal, promotion and demotion of the military officers belonging to the Sanwan-wei. Then, I tried to reconstruct the genealogy and behavior pattern of the persons related to the Kaiyuan Incident using this historical material. As a result, it became clear that two groups with different backgrounds coexisted in Sanwan-wei at that time. In other words, Sanwan-Wei in the early Ming period had a group of senior members who managed other Jurchen peoples while cooperating with the Ming dynasty, while on the other hand, there was a group of newcomers who were managed. In short, it can be said that the rule of the Ming dynasty over Sanwan-wei was realized through the group negotiating with the Ming dynasty and Jurchen.
참고문헌 (48)
- "明太祖實錄", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- "明太宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- "明仁宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- "明宣宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- "明史", 中國基本古籍庫 수록본, ~
- "遼東志", 中國基本古籍庫 수록본, ~
- "全遼志", 中國基本古籍庫 수록본, ~
- 內藤湖南, "內藤湖南全集 7" (1929), 筑摩書房
- 北京圖書舘古籍出版編輯組, "北京圖書舘古籍珎本叢刊(全21冊)" (1994), 書目文獻出版社
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "中國明朝檔案總匯(全101冊)" (2001), 廣西師範大學出版社
- "正德『大明會典』", 中國基本古籍庫 수록본, ~
- "朝鮮世宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- "朝鮮成宗實錄", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- 구범진, "이문 역주" (2012), 세창미디어
- 김주원, "조선왕조실록의 여진족 족명과 인명" (2008), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 남의현, "明代遼東支配政策硏究" (2008), 강원대학교출판부
- 박정민, "조선시대 여진인 내조 연구" (2015), 경인문화사
- 이주엽, "몽골제국의 후예들" (2020), 책과함께
- 한성주, "조선전기 수직여진인 연구" (2011), 경인문화사
- 한성주, "조선시대 藩胡 연구" (2018), 경인문화사
- 于志嘉, "明代軍戶世襲制度" (1987), 學生書局
- 楊暘, "明代遼東都司" (1988), 中州古籍出版社
- 江嶋壽雄, "明代淸初の女直史硏究" (1999), 中國書店
- 內藤湖南, "內藤湖南全集 7" (1970), 筑摩書房
- 園田一亀, "明代建州女直史硏究" (1948), 國立書院
- 川越泰博, "明代中國の軍制と政治" (2001), 國書刊行會
- 荷見守義, "明代遼東と朝鮮" (2014), 汲古書院
- 河內良弘, "明代女眞史の硏究" (1992), 同朋舍出版
- 강성문, "韓民族의 軍事的傳統" (2000), 봉명
- 김경록, "朝鮮初期 軍人送還問題와 朝明間 軍事外交", 군사, (83), pp.221~258 (2012), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 박원호, "明靖難의 役에 대한 朝鮮의 對應", 亞細亞硏究, 26(2) (1983)
- 서병국, "童猛哥帖木兒의 建州左衛硏究", 白山學報, 11 (1971)
- 서인범, "명대의 遼東都司와 東寧衛", 명청사연구, (23), pp.97~122 (2005), 명청사학회
- 정동훈, "宣德帝의 말과 글: 서울과 북경에서 바라본 황제의 두 얼굴", 한국문화, (87), pp.61~85 (2019), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 奇文瑛, "論《三萬衛選簿》中的軍籍女真", 學習與探索 (2007)
- 葉淑香, "明朝對開原內部防御體系的經略", 佳木斯大學社會科學學報, 31(2) (2013)
- 王兆蘭, "明廷對楊木答兀叛逃官兵的招撫", 長春學院學報 (1994)
- 李路華, "明代三萬衛考述", 社會科學戰線 (2009)
- 李鴻彬, "簡論三萬衛", 社會科學戰線 (1990)
- 蔣秀松, "楊木答兀事件評述", 學習與探索 (1983)
- 蔣秀松, "“楊里人”考", 淸史硏究 (1996)
- 牧野巽, "岩井博士古稀紀念典籍論集" (1963), 同事業會
- 長田夏樹, "長田夏樹論述集 下" (2001), ナカニシヤ出版
- 川越泰博, "中國典籍硏究" (1978), 國書刊行會
- 川越泰博, "永樂政權成立史の硏究" (2016), 汲古書院
- 河內良弘, "明代女眞史の硏究" (1992), 同朋舍出版
- 和田淸, "東亞史硏究 (滿洲篇)" (1955), 東洋文庫
- P. Crossley, "The Tong in Two Worlds, Cultural Identities in Liaodong and Nurgan during the 13th-17th centuries", Ch'ing-shih wen-t'i, 4(9) (1983)