본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Levels of Decentralization in the Republic of Korea and Future Policy Directions

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper aims to provide a theoretical review of the characteristics of decentralization measurement variables, and thereby to identify the relationships between the political and economic variables affecting national competitiveness and happiness. This research begins by identifying problems relating to the decentralization policies of Park Geun-Hye administration in Korea. It evaluates these policies from a relative viewpoint, and analyzes how important variables of national policies such as income inequality, regulation levels, corruption levels, social capital, and the transparency of national policies affect local decentralization levels. A policy simulation will also be conducted to examine what differences will be made to ultimate dependent variables such as national competitiveness (national levels) and personal happiness (individual levels), following the assumption that realistic policy decisions are made on the basis of the results of these relation analyses.

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a theoretical review of the characteristics of decentralization measurement variables, and thereby to identify the relationships between the political and economic variables affecting national competitiveness and happiness. This research begins by identifying problems relating to the decentralization policies of Park Geun-Hye administration in Korea. It evaluates these policies from a relative viewpoint, and analyzes how important variables of national policies such as income inequality, regulation levels, corruption levels, social capital, and the transparency of national policies affect local decentralization levels. A policy simulation will also be conducted to examine what differences will be made to ultimate dependent variables such as national competitiveness (national levels) and personal happiness (individual levels), following the assumption that realistic policy decisions are made on the basis of the results of these relation analyses.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Local Service Provision in Selected OECD Countries: Do Centralized Operations Work Better?, "Ahmad, E.", IMF, ~, pp.Working Paper No (2008), 08[DOI]
  2. Baskaran, T., "Fiscal Decentralization, Ideology, and The Size of the Public Sector", European Journal of Political Economy, 27, pp.485~506 (2011)
  3. Bjornskov, C., "On Decentralization and Life Satisfaction", Economic Letters, 99, pp.147~151 (2008)
  4. 최영출, "지방분권 수준과 영향요인 관계 분석: 재정적 분권을 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 17(2), pp.369~389 (2013), 한국지방정부학회
  5. Davoodi, H, "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States", Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), pp.222~239 (1999)
  6. Fukasaku, K., "Decentralisation and Deficits in Latin America" (1998), Development Centre of the OECD
  7. 홍준현, "지방분권 수준 측정을 위한 지방분권 지표의개발과 적용", 지방정부연구, 10(2), pp.7~30 (2006), 한국지방정부학회
  8. IMD, "World Competitiveness Report (online database)", ~ (2011)
  9. 장지현, "OECD 주요 국가들의 유아보육 및 교육정책과 국민행복도 관계 비교분석: 퍼지셋 질적 비교분석방법(FSQCA)의 적용", 한국비교정부학보, 17(2), pp.73~94 (2013), 한국비교정부학회
  10. Jung, J. H., "How To Evaluate National Competitiveness?" (2000), Jijung Publishing
  11. Keum, C. H., "Future Strategy for Decentralization Policies in Park Administration", KRILA Conference Proceedings (2013)
  12. 금창호, "이명박정부의 지방분권정책 추진시스템의 평가", 한국자치행정학보, 27(1), pp.1~18 (2013), 한국자치행정학회
  13. Lee, S. J., "Management Strategies for Successful Policy Implementation", Local Administration Review, 8(3), pp.85~105 (1993)
  14. Lee, S. J., "Evaluating Local Decentralization Policies of Roh Administration", Public Administration Studies, 43(2), pp.68~89 (2005)
  15. Measuring Fiscal Decentralisation: Concepts and Policies, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2013)
  16. Park, H. B, "Social Capital and Local Government Competitiveness", KAPA Conference Proceedings (2001)
  17. Schneider, A., "Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement", Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3), pp.32~56 (2003)
  18. So, J. K., "Measurement Indicators for Social Capital", Korea Regional Development Studies, 16(1), pp.89~118 (2004)
  19. Suh, S. T., "Role and Tasks of Urban Planning for Strengthening Social Capital", Land Studies, 33(2), pp.73~87 (2002)
  20. Global Competitiveness Report 2010–2011, "World Economic Forum", WEF, ~ (2011)
  21. Xie, D., "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in the United States", Journal of Urban Economics, 45, pp.228~239 (1999)
  22. Zhang, T, "Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending and Economic Growth in China", Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), pp.221~240 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)