미국의 중국학 연구동향과 함의 — 저널 ‘모던 차이나(Modern China)’ 분석을 중심으로 —
Trends in Chinese Studies in the United States and its Implications — Focusing on the Analysis of the Journal ‘Modern China’ —
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To understand the divergence of Chinese studies in the US, I focused on the journal ‘Modern China’ as the center of critical discourses circulation. Modern China led by Philip Hwang claimed to stand for critical research, continuously raising the issues of existing researches by means of the intentions of planning project and compilation. I selected the articles of Modern China from 2003 to early 2018 as the data for keyword co-word analysis to trace the changes since the 2000s, which were not evident in previous studies. As a result, the following conclusions were drawn. First, that these researches were aware of the current issues facing China and tried to explain them in their own historical research, while adopting sociology or economics research methods in addition to traditional historical methodology. Second, various contributors including scholars from Japan and China actively participated, the most influential topic among them was gender and women-related research, which has been actively scrutinized since the foundation of the journal and elaborated with the various themes. Next to gender, Guangzhou and modernity was another prominent topic deliberated in related to religion, urbanization, Beijing, women, the Republic of China, Mao Zedong, and education. On the other hand, the topic of nationalism and economic development seemed to be evolved independently rather than through interactions among researchers, since it was closely related to editorial planning. Thus, the recent tendency and research trend of Modern China could be surmised to pursue diversifying themes having been prevailed in the 1980s. Moreover, these diversified themes were blended with each other and broaden the range.
Abstract
To understand the divergence of Chinese studies in the US, I focused on the journal ‘Modern China’ as the center of critical discourses circulation. Modern China led by Philip Hwang claimed to stand for critical research, continuously raising the issues of existing researches by means of the intentions of planning project and compilation. I selected the articles of Modern China from 2003 to early 2018 as the data for keyword co-word analysis to trace the changes since the 2000s, which were not evident in previous studies. As a result, the following conclusions were drawn. First, that these researches were aware of the current issues facing China and tried to explain them in their own historical research, while adopting sociology or economics research methods in addition to traditional historical methodology. Second, various contributors including scholars from Japan and China actively participated, the most influential topic among them was gender and women-related research, which has been actively scrutinized since the foundation of the journal and elaborated with the various themes. Next to gender, Guangzhou and modernity was another prominent topic deliberated in related to religion, urbanization, Beijing, women, the Republic of China, Mao Zedong, and education. On the other hand, the topic of nationalism and economic development seemed to be evolved independently rather than through interactions among researchers, since it was closely related to editorial planning. Thus, the recent tendency and research trend of Modern China could be surmised to pursue diversifying themes having been prevailed in the 1980s. Moreover, these diversified themes were blended with each other and broaden the range.
참고문헌 (47)
- "中國知網"[URL]
- "Modern China; SAGE Journals"[URL]
- 케네스 포머란츠, "대분기" (2016), 에코리브르
- 필립 황, "중국의 감춰진 농업혁명" (2016), 진인진
- Paul A.Cohen, "학문의 제국주의, 오리엔탈리즘과 중국사" (2003), 산해
- 餘倩虹, "當代中國』與美國中國學的發展(1997-2016)", 碩士, pp.2017
- 林穎, "美國中國學, 從傳統到現代- 以費正清爲中心", 碩士, pp.2013
- 張裕立, "亞洲研究雜志 中的中國學研究(1980-2005)", 碩士, pp.2011
- 강진아, "중국 농민으로 상상한 제3의 길 : 차이나 모델 : 『중국의 감춰진 농업혁명』(필립 황 지음, 구범진 옮김, 진인진, 2016)", 역사비평, 117 (2016)
- 오병수, "아시아재단과 홍콩의 냉전(1952~1961) - 냉전시기 미국의 문화정책 -", 동북아역사논총, (48), pp.7~51 (2015), 동북아역사재단
- 이재윤, "지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구", 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), pp.333~355 (2006), 한국문헌정보학회
- 정문상, "포드재단(Ford Foundation)과 동아시아 ‘냉전지식’ －한국과 중화민국의 중국근현대사연구 사례를 중심으로－", 아시아문화연구, 36, pp.179~201 (2014), 아시아문화연구소[DOI]
- 仇華飛, "新世紀中美戰略關系發展趨勢", 社會科學, 2 (2006)
- 仇華飛, "當代美國中國學研究述論", 東方論壇, 4 (2011)
- 管永前, "麥克法誇爾與 『中國季刊』的創立", 北京行政學院學報, 2 (2009)
- 管永前, "文獻計量學視角下的西方當代中國研究『中國季刊』 1960-1969)爲個案", 北京行政學院學報, 4 (2012)
- 管永前, "『中國季刊』視角下的西方毛澤東研究(1960-2014)", 領導麼友, 4 (2016)
- 孟慶波, "美國中國學的發端史研究", 華南農業大學學報(社會科學版), 2 (2013)
- 巫雲仙, "從『中國季刊』看西方學者對中華人民共和國史的研究", 中共黨史研究, 1 (2008)
- 梁怡, "海外中國學硏究中的理論與方法", 北京聯合大學學報, 1 (2013)
- 吳原元, "改革開放以來中國的海外中國學研究", 國際社會科學雜志(中文版), 6 (2009)
- 吳佩烔, "美國經驗與普遍訴求美國中國學思想研究方法論之再研究", 上海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 3 (2015)
- 劉招成, "美國的四代中國學家及其研究", 許昌學院院報, 3 (2003)
- 劉洪濤, "美國30所最優大學東亞系中國研究現狀的調查與分析", 湖南大學學報(社會科學版), 4 (2017)
- 王景倫, "美國對當代中國的研究", 國外社會科學, 7 (1993)
- 汪兵, "侯且岸與美國現代中國學問題研究述略", 黑河學刊, 1 (2018)
- 王瑞, "與美國的中國學研究", 史學理論研究, 2 (2017)
- 王愛雲, "海外當代中國學研究的機遇與挑戰", 北京聯合大學學報(人文化會科學版, 4 (2013)
- 李寶梁, "當代中國研究, 曆史, 現狀與發展", 江西社會科學, 1 (2006)
- 李婷婷, "當代美國中國學研究的又一部力作-『美國的中國學研究』評述", 國外社會科學, 6 (2013)
- 張廣智, "探索無止境讀『美國中國學史研究", 探索與爭鳴, 12 (2004)
- 張注洪, "國外當代中國史研究的概況與評析", 當代中國史研究, 1 (2007)
- 褚國飛, "美國中國史研究模式呈現多樣化", 中國社會科學報, 7 (2010)
- 鄭先興, "改革開放以來中西史學比較的理論研究", 南都學壇, 4 (2010)
- 朱政惠, "關於美國中國學家的總結和反思", 曆史教學問題, 4 (2003)
- 朱政惠, "海外學者對中國史學的研究與思考", 史林, 4 (2006)
- 朱政惠, "美國的中國研究 : 曆史與現狀", 中國社會科學報 (2010)
- 朱政惠, "美國學者對中國學研究的回顧與反思", 江海學刊, 3 (2011)
- 周曉虹, "當代中國硏究的歷史與現狀", 南京大學學報, 3 (2002)
- 何培忠, "國外中國學研究學科創立初期回顧", 國外社會科學, 4 (2013)
- 何培忠, "國外當代中國學的發展與變化", 中國社會科學報, 3 (2015)
- 何玉興, "趙穗生與美國當代中國誕生記", 社會科學報, 12 (2016)
- 郝平, "美國當代中國研究四十年概述", 化京大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 6 (1997)
- 黃育馥, "20世紀80年代以來美國中國學的幾點變化", 當代中國史研究, 5 (2005)
- 侯且岸, "費正清與美國現代中國學", 史學理論研究, 2 (1995)
- Huang, Philip C. C, "Theory and the Study of Modern Chinese History:Four Traps and a Question", Modern china, 24 (1998)
- Huang, Philip C. C, "Rethinking China Studies in the United States", Modern china January, 7 (2016)