본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘임나 대마도설’과 전도(顚倒)된 식민주의

The Theory of 'Imna-Daemado' and the Inverted Colonialism

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This article is an attempt to confirm what was in the background of emergence of "The theory of Imna-Daemado". This theory, which has recently been raised again by some historians and misleads the public, was started at the research of Mun Jeongchang and Lee Byeongseon. Their claims are based on several records of Nihonsyoki. However, there are historical records of Korea that can exclude their claims. The method of history is to cross-validate these historical records to reach the truth. However, they attempted to settle the problem by excluding or concealing part of the records which is against their claim. Their conducts show that there is an intended purposes in their research. It is hard to regard this as a result of each individual researcher's ambition. On the basis of so-called "Territorial Purism", they tried to exclude the colonies of other states in the historical area of Korea and to create our colonies in the historical area of Japan. Consequently, Imna was colonized by ancient state of Korea established in Tsushima Island. This provides the fact that colonialism which changed only subject holds place inside their researches.

Abstract

This article is an attempt to confirm what was in the background of emergence of "The theory of Imna-Daemado". This theory, which has recently been raised again by some historians and misleads the public, was started at the research of Mun Jeongchang and Lee Byeongseon. Their claims are based on several records of Nihonsyoki. However, there are historical records of Korea that can exclude their claims. The method of history is to cross-validate these historical records to reach the truth. However, they attempted to settle the problem by excluding or concealing part of the records which is against their claim. Their conducts show that there is an intended purposes in their research. It is hard to regard this as a result of each individual researcher's ambition. On the basis of so-called "Territorial Purism", they tried to exclude the colonies of other states in the historical area of Korea and to create our colonies in the historical area of Japan. Consequently, Imna was colonized by ancient state of Korea established in Tsushima Island. This provides the fact that colonialism which changed only subject holds place inside their researches.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 文定昌, "日本上古史-韓國史의 延長" (1970), 柏文堂
  2. 연민수, "역주 일본서기 1" (2013), 동북아역사재단
  3. 王健群, "廣開土王碑硏究" (1985), 역민사
  4. 이덕일, "동아시아 고대사의 쟁점" (2019), 만권당
  5. 이문영, "만들어진 한국사" (2010), 파란미디어
  6. 李炳銑, "任那國과 對馬島" (1987), 亞細亞文化社
  7. 李炳銑, "對馬島는 韓國의 屬島였다" (2005), 이회
  8. 李裕岦, "廣開土王成陵碑文譯註" (1973), 大東文化社
  9. 崔棟, "朝鮮上古民族史" (1966), 東國文化社
  10. 황순종, "임나일본부는 없었다" (2016), 만권당
  11. 武田幸男, "廣開土王碑墨本の硏究" (2009), 吉川弘文館
  12. 三品彰英, "日本書紀朝鮮關係記事考證, 上" (1962), 吉川弘文館
  13. 나행주, "임나 문제와 한일관계" (2005), 景仁文化社
  14. 신가영, "한국 고대사와 사이비역사학" (2017), 역사비평
  15. 위가야, "욕망 너머의 한국 고대사" (2018), 서해문집
  16. 이정빈, "한국 고대사와 사이비역사학" (2017), 역사비평
  17. 임지현, "근대의 국경, 역사의 변경-변경에 서서 역사를 바라보다" (2004), 휴머니스트
  18. 김석형, "삼한 삼국의 일본 렬도 내 분국(分國)들에 대하여", 력사과학, (1) (1963)
  19. 김태식, "고대 한일관계 연구사 -임나문제를 중심으로-", 한국고대사연구, 27, pp.15~52 (2002), 한국고대사학회
  20. 정효운, "고대한일관계사와 대마도", 일어일문학, (46), pp.433~451 (2010), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
  21. 이문영, "『환단고기』의 성립 배경과 기원", 역사비평, (118), pp.40~73 (2017), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
  22. 旗田巍, "朝鮮民主主義人民共和國における古代日朝關係史の硏究", 歷史學硏究, 284 (1964)
  23. 李永植, "加耶諸國と任那日本府" (1993), 吉川弘文館
  24. 조인성, "한국고대사인식의 이면-식민지 창출과 관련하여-", 서강대학교 트랜스내셔널 인문학연구소 학술회의 “아시아의 ‘경계’들을 다시 생각하다: ‘상상 – 일상 – 미학’ (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)