A Comparative Analysis of Refugee Protection and Responsibility-Sharing in Central Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes refugee protection in Central Asia using a burden- and responsibility-sharing framework across three dimensions: (1) hosting capacity, (2) legal-policy alignment, and (3) financial/institutional contributions. It compares Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, revealing wide variation in engagement. Tajikistan hosts the most registered refugees, while Kazakhstan has the largest population in refugee-like situations. Legal frameworks show uneven alignment with the 1951 Refugee Convention. Financial support is limited, with only Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan contributing to UNHCR. All five countries, however, support the Global Compact on Refugees. The study concludes that while capacity and commitment vary, refugee responsibility-sharing is gradually evolving across the region.
Abstract
This study analyzes refugee protection in Central Asia using a burden- and responsibility-sharing framework across three dimensions: (1) hosting capacity, (2) legal-policy alignment, and (3) financial/institutional contributions. It compares Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, revealing wide variation in engagement. Tajikistan hosts the most registered refugees, while Kazakhstan has the largest population in refugee-like situations. Legal frameworks show uneven alignment with the 1951 Refugee Convention. Financial support is limited, with only Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan contributing to UNHCR. All five countries, however, support the Global Compact on Refugees. The study concludes that while capacity and commitment vary, refugee responsibility-sharing is gradually evolving across the region.