본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Key Determinants of B udg et E xecution w ith the Political Market Approach: A Case Study of Korean Local Government

Junki Lee|윤태섭|Sungkyu Jang
사람과세계경영학회 (People&Global Business Association)|2023.06|Global Business and Finance Review|제28권 제3호|pp. 85-101|DOI 10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.85

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Panel data analysisBudget executionOperating expensesPolitical market approach

초록

Purpose: This study is aims to analyze relationships among population, resident income, fiscal characteristics, and operating expenses in Korean local governments through investigating factors that affect operating expenses for managing local governments. Design/methodology/approach: To examine the factors affecting operating expenses, this study utilizes research framework using key determinants of budget execution in terms of operating expenses with the political market approach. For doing so, this study conducts panel regression analysis using 226 Korean local governments' empirical data during FY2016-FY2020. Findings: Analytical results show that population and fiscal factors of local governments do not explain a size of operating expenses; moreover, it reveals that local governments with a small population and fiscal size tend to spend more operating expenses. Research limitations/implications: Tis study is initiated based on the hypothesis that decrease of population would lead to decline demands for public goods and public services, which reduce the number of public goods and public services, and it would finally cause the reduction of local governments' operating expenses. However, this study has a limitation regarding to restricting the period of data since FY2016. Originality/value: Despite the above limitation, this study reveals that population variables and fiscal variables do not explain a size of operating expenses of Korean local governments. Rather, the analytical result shows that local governments with a small population and fiscal size spend more operating expenses. Therefore, this study suggests that it pays more attention to improving efficiency of organizational operation of local governments in the future.

Abstract

Purpose: This study is aims to analyze relationships among population, resident income, fiscal characteristics, and operating expenses in Korean local governments through investigating factors that affect operating expenses for managing local governments. Design/methodology/approach: To examine the factors affecting operating expenses, this study utilizes research framework using key determinants of budget execution in terms of operating expenses with the political market approach. For doing so, this study conducts panel regression analysis using 226 Korean local governments' empirical data during FY2016-FY2020. Findings: Analytical results show that population and fiscal factors of local governments do not explain a size of operating expenses; moreover, it reveals that local governments with a small population and fiscal size tend to spend more operating expenses. Research limitations/implications: Tis study is initiated based on the hypothesis that decrease of population would lead to decline demands for public goods and public services, which reduce the number of public goods and public services, and it would finally cause the reduction of local governments' operating expenses. However, this study has a limitation regarding to restricting the period of data since FY2016. Originality/value: Despite the above limitation, this study reveals that population variables and fiscal variables do not explain a size of operating expenses of Korean local governments. Rather, the analytical result shows that local governments with a small population and fiscal size spend more operating expenses. Therefore, this study suggests that it pays more attention to improving efficiency of organizational operation of local governments in the future.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Bae, I. M., "Analysis of Effects of Local Government's Self-Government Financial Power on Local Appropriation Structure : Focusing on the Municipal Government", Korean Public Administration Review, 34(2), pp.161~177 (2000)
  2. Bahl, R., "State and local debt burdens in the 1980s : A study in contrast", Public Administration Review, 53(1), pp.31~40 (1993)
  3. Elham Bokhari, "What Determines Saudi Arabia's Development Finance? An Empirical Approach", Global Business and Finance Review, 27(5), pp.42~54 (2022), 사람과세계경영학회[DOI]
  4. Cha, B. K., "Current status of local allocation tax and state subsidy system and financial equity", Economic Review, 4(2), pp.272~324 (1984)
  5. 최임수, "Efforts of South Korean Local Governments to Expand the Good Landlord Movement: Focus on Property Tax Reduction and Exemption", Global Business and Finance Review, 27(6), pp.89~103 (2022), 사람과세계경영학회[DOI]
  6. 최재녕, "지방정부의 재정능력과 복지재정지출 결정요인 연구: 기초자치단체를 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 9(4), pp.451~474 (2005), 한국정책과학학회
  7. Eberts, R. W., "The effect of federal policies on local public infrastructure investment", Public Finance Quarterly, 20(4), pp.557~571 (1992)
  8. Fabricant, S., "Factors in the accumulation of social statistics", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(258), pp.255~262 (1952)
  9. Feiock, R. C., "Testing competing explanations for policy adoption : Municipal solid waste recycling programs", Political Research Quarterly, 46(2), pp.399~419 (1993)
  10. "A political market explanation for policy change. Florida State University program in local governance" (2006)[URL]
  11. Feiock, R. C., "Institutional Constraints and Local Policy Choices: An Exploration of Local Governance" (2001), SUNY Press
  12. 하능식, "지역의 인구구조가 지방재정에 미치는 영향", 한국지방재정논집, 12(1), pp.77~98 (2007), 한국지방재정학회[DOI]
  13. Ha, Y. S., "Introduction in Public Finance" (2008), Dasan books
  14. Han, W. T., "Changes and Factors of Different Local Government Fiscal Expenditure in Implementation of Local Autonomy", Local Autonomy Review, 6(2), pp.5~27 (1994)
  15. Yuzana Hlaing, "Determinants of Myanmar’s Trade Pattern and Policy Implications for Effective Financing", Global Business and Finance Review, 26(3), pp.100~110 (2021), 사람과세계경영학회[DOI]
  16. 허명순, "지방정부의 부채수준 결정요인에 관한 연구 - 미국 뉴저지주 주민투표 요건의 영향을 중심으로 -", 서울도시연구, 4(2), pp.15~27 (2003), 서울연구원[DOI]
  17. Hwang, Y. W., "Determinants of Local Government Budget", Korean Public Administration Review, 21(2), pp.385~396 (1987)
  18. 정성호, "지방자치단체의 정부 간 이전수익이 부채에 미치는 영향", 한국행정학보, 47(2), pp.219~245 (2013), 한국행정학회
  19. Jun, S. K., "The Political Economy of National Subsidy Distribution : Comparison of Park, Chun, and Roh Governments in Korea", Korean Public Administration Review, 29(3), pp.699~712 (1995)
  20. 전상경, "정치적 환경변화와 국고보조금배분의 연관성에 관한 실증연구*", 지방정부연구, 16(1), pp.121~145 (2012), 한국지방정부학회[DOI]
  21. 전성만, "지방자치단체 현금성 복지 지출 실태와 정책적 함의: 2017~2021년 세부 사업별 지출을 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 26(3), pp.37~61 (2022), 한국지방정부학회[DOI]
  22. Kang, Y. H., "Differences in Policy Choices Between Governments : Comparative Analysis of Social Welfare Expenditure Between Metropolitan Areas and Local Governments", Korean Public Administration Review, 34(3), pp.353~370 (2000)
  23. Kim, J. A., "The influence analysis that populatiuon aging has an local finance", The Studies in Regional Development, 8(2), pp.203~225 (2003)
  24. Kim, J. H., "A New Approach to Testing Determinants of the Government Growth", Korean Public Administration Review, 27(1), pp.135~154 (1993)
  25. Kim, J. U., "Analysis of Monitoring Local Finance : Case of Kyongbuk Province", Journal of Korean National Economy, 21(3), pp.171~205 (2003)
  26. Kim, R., "The Determinants of State and Local Government Debt Financing in the U.S", Journal of Local Government Studies, 14(3), pp.173~191 (2002)
  27. 김성주, "사회복지 국고보조금의 결정요인 분석", 지방행정연구, 22(3), pp.255~281 (2008), (재) 한국지방행정연구원[DOI]
  28. Kim, T. I., "Local Autonomy and Welfare Expenditure of Local Government", Korean Public Administration Review, 35(1), pp.69~90 (2001)
  29. 김연준, "지방자치단체 사회복지지출 영향요인 분석: 공간패널회귀분석을 중심으로", 한국지방재정논집, 26(2), pp.123~151 (2021), 한국지방재정학회[DOI]
  30. Lee, S. J., "Local Autonomy and the policy Orientation of Local Government", Korean Public Administration Review, 26(2), pp.573~589 (1992)
  31. LeLoup, L. T., "The myth of incrementalism : analytical choices in budgetary theory", Polity, 10(4), pp.488~509 (1978)
  32. Mueller, D. C., "Readings in public choice and constitutional political economy", pp.31~46 (2008), Springer
  33. Namkoong, K., "Determinants of Local Government Expenditures", Korean Public Administration Review, 28(3), pp.991~1014 (1994)
  34. 박성진, "Asymmetric information and excess budget: the influence of performance-based budgeting on budgetary slack in US states", International Review of Public Administration, 26(4), pp.353~372 (2021), 한국행정학회[DOI]
  35. Sharkansky, I., "Dimensions of state politics, economics, and public policy", American Political Science Review, 63(3), pp.867~879 (1969)
  36. 신무섭, "한국 지방자치단체 지출수준의 결정요인", 한국행정논집, 19(3), pp.607~633 (2007), 한국정부학회
  37. 신지민, "지방자치단체의 사회투자형 복지지출이 재정건전성에 미치는 영향 분석: 서울시를 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 26(3), pp.63~80 (2022), 한국지방정부학회[DOI]
  38. Son, H. J., "Analysis of determinants of local financial expenditure following implementation of local self-government system", Korean Public Administration Review, 33(1), pp.81~97 (1999)
  39. Jaka Winarna, "Financial Distress of Local Government: A Study on Local Government Characteristics, Infrastructure, and Financial Condition", Global Business and Finance Review, 22(2), pp.34~47 (2017), 사람과세계경영학회[DOI]
  40. Wooldridge, J. M., "Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data" (2010), MIT Press
  41. Ke Yang, "Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Explore Customer’s Behavioral Intention to Use Self-Service Technologies (SSTs) in Chinese Budget Hotels", Global Business and Finance Review, 26(1), pp.79~94 (2021), 사람과세계경영학회[DOI]
  42. Yoo, B. W., "A study on the determinants of policy calculation in local governments", Journal of Community Development, 1, pp.87~106 (1990)
  43. 윤석완, "인구감소와 고령화에 의한 지방재정지출의 영향", 한국지방재정논집, 14(3), pp.41~71 (2009), 한국지방재정학회[DOI]
  44. 윤태섭, "지방보조금 규모 관련 요인에 관한 실증적 연구", 정책분석평가학회보, 27(2), pp.49~74 (2017), 한국정책분석평가학회[DOI]
  45. "Local government budgeting and operating standards", ~ (2021)
  46. "Local fiscal yearbook. 2016-2020", ~
  47. "Local fiscal analysis. 2016-2020", ~
  48. "Statistics Korea"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

지방정부 복지예산지출 영향요인에 관한 연구: 광역 지방정부 복지예산지출을 중심으로공창동한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2021 · 제25권 제4호지방정부의 재정건전성에 영향을 미치는 정치적 요인에 관한 연구윤성원한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2019 · 제23권 제4호지방정부의 재정혁신에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 주민참여예산제도를 중심으로남황우, 박형근한국지방재정학회 · 한국지방재정논집2012 · 제17권 제3호지방자치단체의 불용액 결정요인에 관한 연구강희진, 엄태호, 이태천(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2025 · 제39권 제1호An Analysis of Political Effects on Government Expenditure: From Financial Accountability Perspective문광민, 양지숙, 이희선국회입법조사처 · 입법과 정책2014 · 제6권 제1호지방재정관리제도가 지방자치단체 예산집행에 미치는 영향: 불용액 및 이월액을 중심으로양지숙, 오현주한국공공관리학회 · 한국공공관리학보2020 · 제34권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Toward Developing a National Customer Satisfaction Index in JordanIbrahim Mukattash, Dia Zeglatpp. 1-14Integrity, CEO Compensation, and Performance: Evidence from Public Enterprises in South Korea이호영, Moon-Kyung Cho, 윤인경pp. 15-34Financial Attitude, Trust, and ROSCAs' Member Commitment: Social Relations as Mediating FactorHusnurrosyidah, Ely Masykuroh, Siti Amarohpp. 35-49Ethical Consumption in the Digital Age: Analyzing Benefit Types, Temporal Distance, and Normative Factors for Gen ZMoosung Chung, Jay R. Fraser, Hongsik J. Cheonpp. 50-67Strengthening the Link Between Organizational Culture and Employee Loyalty: Exploring the Mediating Effects of Employee Trust and Job SatisfactionPham Hoang Hien, Tran Thanh Tuanpp. 68-84
원문 보기