보건의료관련 의사결정 과정에서의 시민참여에 대한 국내외 현황
Citizen Participation in the Healthcare Decision-Making Process: Review of Real Cases
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: There are increasing needs to involve the public when making the healthcare policy decision worldwide. Several countries already adopted the citizen engagement process when they make healthcare policy decision. We intend to examine and review the real cases of citizen participation in the healthcare decision-making process. Methods: A computerized literature search was conducted in six electronic databases (KoreaMed, KMbase, KISS, PRISM, PubMed, and the Cochrane library) to identify the cases of citizen participation in the healthcare decision-making process not only in other countries but also in Korea. After we identified the real cases for foreign countries, we visited the website of each institution in the UK, Canada, Brazil, etc. to examine the purpose and methods of citizen participation, definition of citizen, organization and management of citizens’ council, discussed topics, and the way to reflect in the healthcare decision. Results: We have found several cases of citizen participation in Korea which occurred recently. Six foreign countries such as the UK, Canada, Brazil, Sweden, New Zealand, and Israel had a citizen participation process. Especially, the UK and Canada had a well-made and structured citizens’ council system. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK started the citizens’ council system from year 2002 until now. Canada started the citizen participation process from 2002 with the name of Commission for future of health care in Canada which lasted for two years. Toronto Health Policy Citizens’ Council was formed in 2007 to discuss the priority setting in health care research, which was the preparation work to make Ontario citizens’ council in 2009. Ontario citizens’ council is similar to citizens’ council at NICE. Conclusion: The real cases and experiences in the UK and Canada might provide valuable insight and implications to establish the citizen participation process in Korea.
Abstract
Objectives: There are increasing needs to involve the public when making the healthcare policy decision worldwide. Several countries already adopted the citizen engagement process when they make healthcare policy decision. We intend to examine and review the real cases of citizen participation in the healthcare decision-making process. Methods: A computerized literature search was conducted in six electronic databases (KoreaMed, KMbase, KISS, PRISM, PubMed, and the Cochrane library) to identify the cases of citizen participation in the healthcare decision-making process not only in other countries but also in Korea. After we identified the real cases for foreign countries, we visited the website of each institution in the UK, Canada, Brazil, etc. to examine the purpose and methods of citizen participation, definition of citizen, organization and management of citizens’ council, discussed topics, and the way to reflect in the healthcare decision. Results: We have found several cases of citizen participation in Korea which occurred recently. Six foreign countries such as the UK, Canada, Brazil, Sweden, New Zealand, and Israel had a citizen participation process. Especially, the UK and Canada had a well-made and structured citizens’ council system. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK started the citizens’ council system from year 2002 until now. Canada started the citizen participation process from 2002 with the name of Commission for future of health care in Canada which lasted for two years. Toronto Health Policy Citizens’ Council was formed in 2007 to discuss the priority setting in health care research, which was the preparation work to make Ontario citizens’ council in 2009. Ontario citizens’ council is similar to citizens’ council at NICE. Conclusion: The real cases and experiences in the UK and Canada might provide valuable insight and implications to establish the citizen participation process in Korea.
참고문헌 (21)
- Dolan P, "NICE’s citizen’s council: what do we ask them, and how?", Lancet, 362, pp.918~919 (2003)
- "National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)"[URL]
- "National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)"[URL]
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, "Social Value Judgements: principles for the development of NICE guidance. 2nd ed", National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, ~ (2008)
- "Health Canada"[URL]
- "Healthdebate"[URL]
- "Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (Ontario MoHLTC)"[URL]
- "Participedia"[URL]
- "Sistema Único de Saúd; National Health Council (Brazil)"[URL]
- 약제급여결정 시 고려할 수 있는 사회적 가치 도출 방안, "Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service", Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, ~ (2013)
- Oh J, "Participation of the Lay Public in Decision-making for Benefit Coverage of National Health Insurance in South Korea", Working paper of Takemi Program 30th Anniversary Symposium (2013)
- Charles C, "Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework", J Health Polit Policy Law, 18, pp.881~904 (1993)
- 서혜선, "외국의 보건의료정책 의사결정에서 국민 참여 사례", HIRA 정책동향, 7, pp.50~62 (2013)
- Jeyanathan T, "Recommendations for Establishing a Citizens’ Council to Guide Drug Policy in Ontario", Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, ~ (2006)
- Coelho VSP, "Brazil’s health councils: the challenge of building participatory political institutions", IDS Bulletin, 35, pp.33~39 (2004)
- Cornwall A, "Taking a seat on Brazil’s health councils" (2009), Powercube
- Ham C, "Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience", Health Policy, 42, pp.49~66 (1997)
- Calltorp J, "Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway", Health Policy, 50, pp.1~22 (1999)
- Bruni RA, "Public engagement in setting priorities in health care", CMAJ, 179, pp.15~18 (2008)
- Edgar W, "Rationing Health Care in New Zealand: how the public have a say", Second International Conference on Priorities in Health Care (1998)
- Shani S, "Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience", Health Policy, 54, pp.169~185 (2000)