본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

국내 신개발 유망의료기술 탐색활동 결과 및 업무량 분석

Evaluation of Results and Workloads of the Horizon Scanning of the Emerging Health Technology in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: To evaluate results and workloads of the horizon scanning of the emerging health technology since 2014 to 2016. Methods: In order to analyze the results of the emerging health technology, we identified the number of research procedure between 2014 and 2016. The sixteen findings were calculated annual workload by person, and categorized by medical phase, classification of disease, and healthcare technology. Results: An average of 5.67 personnel were involved over three years, assessment of each emerging healthcare technology was performed for each person of identifying 54 cases, filtering 2.4 cases, prioritizing 0.9 cases were performed. According to the mapping by healthcare technologies, nine medical devices (56.3%), six drugs (37.5%), and one material of the medical treatment (6.3%) were assessed. Among sixteen findings, fifteen cases were health technologies for treatment and only one case for diagnosis. Conclusion: Future plans of the horizon scanning of the emerging health technology is required appropriate manpower in charge each target number of assessment. And a legal basis should be provided for policy reflection rate. Furthermore, an evaluation criteria and procedures should be transparent to avoid a conflict of interest.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate results and workloads of the horizon scanning of the emerging health technology since 2014 to 2016. Methods: In order to analyze the results of the emerging health technology, we identified the number of research procedure between 2014 and 2016. The sixteen findings were calculated annual workload by person, and categorized by medical phase, classification of disease, and healthcare technology. Results: An average of 5.67 personnel were involved over three years, assessment of each emerging healthcare technology was performed for each person of identifying 54 cases, filtering 2.4 cases, prioritizing 0.9 cases were performed. According to the mapping by healthcare technologies, nine medical devices (56.3%), six drugs (37.5%), and one material of the medical treatment (6.3%) were assessed. Among sixteen findings, fifteen cases were health technologies for treatment and only one case for diagnosis. Conclusion: Future plans of the horizon scanning of the emerging health technology is required appropriate manpower in charge each target number of assessment. And a legal basis should be provided for policy reflection rate. Furthermore, an evaluation criteria and procedures should be transparent to avoid a conflict of interest.

참고문헌 (6)

  1. 최지은, "유망의료기술탐색의 해외동향: 영국을 중심으로", pp.102~115 (2013), 한국보건의료연구원
  2. 박주연, "신개발 유망의료기술 탐색체계 구축", pp.12~23 (2014), 한국보건의료연구원
  3. 이성규, "신개발 유망의료기술 탐색활동 시범사업연구: 잠재적 영향력 분석 및 운영체계개발" (2014), 한국보건의료연구원
  4. 이성규, "한국형 신개발 유망의료기술 탐색체계 사업화 기반확립 연구" (2015), 한국보건의료연구원
  5. 박주연, "2016년 신개발 의료기술의 수평탐색활동 연구: 수평탐색활동 강화 및 국가 R&D 기관과의 협력 체계 구축" (2016), 한국보건의료연구원
  6. "koicd.kr"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)