경피적 관상동맥 중재 시술 후 이중 항혈소판 치료를 받는 환자에서 aspirin 병용 약제의 종류에 따른 심혈관계 사건 발생률 비교
Incidence of Cardiovascular Events: A comparative study of Dual Anti-Platelet Therapies in Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, which reduces ischemic adverse events, is the established standard of care in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, and the Korean society interventional cardiology, recommend the use of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor in combination with aspirin as DAPT. However, there are differences amongst the various guidelines, in detailed recommendations for P2Y12 receptor antagonists. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiovascular events according to the type of P2Y12 receptor antagonists in combination with aspirin, in post-PCI DAPT patients. This retrospective study was a follow up after 12 months of starting DAPT, in ACS patients who had undergone PCI at the Severance Hospital between January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups: clopidogrel group and ticagrelor group, according to the P2Y12 receptor antagonist combined with aspirin. The baseline characteristics of patients and incidence of cardiovascular events (mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and bleeding) were analyzed and compared between groups. A total of 715 patients were divided into the clopidogrel group (n=635) and the ticagrelor group (n=80). Total incidence of cardiovascular events was higher in the ticagrelor group than clopidogrel group(11.3% vs. 5.7%, respectively; p=0.081). There was no significant difference in the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke, but the incidence of bleeding was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group(7.5% vs. 2.4%, respectively; p 0.05). This study revealed the differences in the incidence of cardiovascular events according to the type of P2Y12 receptor antagonists used in combination with aspirin as DAPT. As compared with clopidogrel, a higher rate of bleeding with ticagrelor suggests that ticagrelor should be used with caution due to an increased risk of bleeding.
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, which reduces ischemic adverse events, is the established standard of care in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, and the Korean society interventional cardiology, recommend the use of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor in combination with aspirin as DAPT. However, there are differences amongst the various guidelines, in detailed recommendations for P2Y12 receptor antagonists. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiovascular events according to the type of P2Y12 receptor antagonists in combination with aspirin, in post-PCI DAPT patients. This retrospective study was a follow up after 12 months of starting DAPT, in ACS patients who had undergone PCI at the Severance Hospital between January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups: clopidogrel group and ticagrelor group, according to the P2Y12 receptor antagonist combined with aspirin. The baseline characteristics of patients and incidence of cardiovascular events (mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and bleeding) were analyzed and compared between groups. A total of 715 patients were divided into the clopidogrel group (n=635) and the ticagrelor group (n=80). Total incidence of cardiovascular events was higher in the ticagrelor group than clopidogrel group(11.3% vs. 5.7%, respectively; p=0.081). There was no significant difference in the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke, but the incidence of bleeding was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group(7.5% vs. 2.4%, respectively; p 0.05). This study revealed the differences in the incidence of cardiovascular events according to the type of P2Y12 receptor antagonists used in combination with aspirin as DAPT. As compared with clopidogrel, a higher rate of bleeding with ticagrelor suggests that ticagrelor should be used with caution due to an increased risk of bleeding.
참고문헌 (14)
- Yusuf S, "Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation", N Engl J Med, 345, pp.494~502 (2001)
- Paramo JA, "New era in antiplatelet therapy based on results from recent clinical trials", Med Clin, 137(11), pp.504~508 (2011)
- Gandhi S, "Increased uptake of guideline-recommended oral antiplatelet therapy : insights from the Canadian acute coronary syndrome reflective", Can J Cardiol, 30(12), pp.1725~1731 (2014)
- Wiviott SD, "Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes", N Engl J Med, 357, pp.2001~2015 (2007)
- Wallentin L, "Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes", N Engl J Med, 361, pp.1045~1057 (2009)
- Levine GN, "2016ACC", AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease, 2016, pp.152(5), 1243~1275
- Roffi M, "2015ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation", Eur Heart J, 37(3), pp.267~315 (2016)
- 허혈성 심질환 임상연구센터, "급성 관동맥 증후군에서 항혈소판제 투여요법의 권고안", 대한심장학회, ~ (2012)
- "Prasugrel: 식품의약품안전처 허가기준 용법용량및 사용상의 주의사항", ~
- Goto S, "Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome-Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III PHILO Study", Circ J, 79(11), pp.2452~2460 (2015)
- "Diabetes Mellitus and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy" (2016)[URL]
- Price MJ, "Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention : a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay : Impact on Throm-bosis and Safety(GRAVITAS)trial", Circulation, 124(10), pp.1132~1137 (2011)
- Pisters R, "A Novel User-Friendly Score(HAS-BLED)to Assess 1-Year Risk of Major Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation", CHEST, 138(5), pp.1093~1100 (2010)
- Shoeb M, "Assessing bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants", J Thromb Thrombolysis, 35(3), pp.312~319 (2013)
