본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

경피적 관상동맥 중재술을 시행한 급성 관상동맥 증후군 환자에서 Ticagrelor와 Clopidogrel의 유효성과 안전성 비교

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background : European and American guidelines recommend ticagrelor and prasugrel over clopidogrel in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a higher bleeding risk than clopidogrel. Thrombotic and bleeding tendencies also differ between Asian and non-Asian populations. Therefore, domestic studies and guidelines are needed to optimize antiplatelet therapy in Asian patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing PCI to determine optimal antiplatelet therapy. Methods : This retrospective study included patients with ACS undergoing PCI who were treated with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel in a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and June 2023. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major bleeding events were analyzed to assess efficacy and safety, respectively. Results : This study analyzed 460 patients, including 129 (28.0%) who received ticagrelor and 331 (72.0%) who received clopidogrel. Analysis showed that the clopidogrel group was significantly older, while the proportion of male patients was higher in the ticagrelor group (p < 0.001 for both). The proportion of myocardial infarction among ACS types was higher in the ticagrelor group (p=0.009), while hypertension and diabetes were more common in the clopidogrel group (p=0.020 and p=0.001, respectively). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the clopidogrel group (p=0.007). To minimize bias, propensity score matching (1:1) was performed, resulting in 44 matched pairs (88 patients). Outcome analysis after matching showed no significant differences in MACEs (25.0 vs. 15.9%, p=0.290) or major bleeding events between ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (0.0 vs. 4.5%, p=0.247). Conclusion : There was no significant difference in efficacy or safety between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Further multicenter, prospective studies are needed to provide stronger evidence for optimal antiplatelet therapy.

Abstract

Background : European and American guidelines recommend ticagrelor and prasugrel over clopidogrel in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a higher bleeding risk than clopidogrel. Thrombotic and bleeding tendencies also differ between Asian and non-Asian populations. Therefore, domestic studies and guidelines are needed to optimize antiplatelet therapy in Asian patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing PCI to determine optimal antiplatelet therapy. Methods : This retrospective study included patients with ACS undergoing PCI who were treated with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel in a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and June 2023. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major bleeding events were analyzed to assess efficacy and safety, respectively. Results : This study analyzed 460 patients, including 129 (28.0%) who received ticagrelor and 331 (72.0%) who received clopidogrel. Analysis showed that the clopidogrel group was significantly older, while the proportion of male patients was higher in the ticagrelor group (p < 0.001 for both). The proportion of myocardial infarction among ACS types was higher in the ticagrelor group (p=0.009), while hypertension and diabetes were more common in the clopidogrel group (p=0.020 and p=0.001, respectively). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the clopidogrel group (p=0.007). To minimize bias, propensity score matching (1:1) was performed, resulting in 44 matched pairs (88 patients). Outcome analysis after matching showed no significant differences in MACEs (25.0 vs. 15.9%, p=0.290) or major bleeding events between ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (0.0 vs. 4.5%, p=0.247). Conclusion : There was no significant difference in efficacy or safety between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Further multicenter, prospective studies are needed to provide stronger evidence for optimal antiplatelet therapy.

관련 논문AI추천

경피적 관상동맥 중재술 시행 후 이중항혈소판요법 중인 비ST분절 상승 심근경색증 환자에서 Clopidogrel과 Ticagrelor의 효과 및 안전성 비교고종희, 금민정, 김수현, 류정현, 손은선, 유윤미한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2025 · 제42권 제1호경피적 관상동맥 중재 시술 후 이중 항혈소판 치료를 받는 환자에서 aspirin 병용 약제의 종류에 따른 심혈관계 사건 발생률 비교금민정, 김재송, 김혜원, 손가영, 손은선한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2017 · 제34권 제3호The current status and outcomes of in-hospital P2Y12 receptor inhibitor switching in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction윤정한, Chong Jin Kim, Dong-Joo Choi, Doo Il Kim, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Hyo-Soo Kim, Hyun Kuk Kim, Hyun Yi Kook, In-Whan Seong, Jei Keon Chae, Jin-Yong Hwang, Jong Seon Park, Keun-Ho Park, Ki-Bae Seung, Kwang Soo Cha, Myeong Chan Cho, Myung Ho Jeong, Seok Kyu Oh, Seung-Ho Hur, Seung-Jae Joo, Seung Woon Rha, Shung Chull Chae, Sung Soo Kim, Tae Hoon Ahn, Young-Jae Ki, Youngkeun Ahn대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2022 · 제37권 제2호급성관상동맥 증후군 치료를 위한 국내·외 항혈소판제 약물요법 가이드라인 비교 연구백인환, 이채원, 정은주한국임상약학회 · 한국임상약학회지2015 · 제25권 제3호Randomized Comparison of Strut Coverage between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Myocardial Infarction at 3-Month Optical Coherence Tomography고영국, 김병극, 김중선, 김충기, 안철민, 장양수, 최동훈, 홍명기, 홍성진연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2018 · 제59권 제5호관상동맥 약물 용출 스텐트 삽입 후 항혈소판제제 3제요법과 2제요법의 임상적 효과 비교김정태, 예경남, 이숙향한국임상약학회 · 한국임상약학회지2012 · 제22권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)