본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유방암 환자에서 수술 후 보조요법으로 투여한 Trastuzumab 정맥주사와 피하주사 제형의 안전성 비교

Comparison Adverse Events on Intravenous Versus Subcutaneous Trastuzumab as Part of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background : A subcutaneous trastuzumab formulation has been developed as an alternative to the intravenous formulation. Although the safety of the two formulations was similar, some adverse reactions such as surgical wound infection and infusion-related reaction were more common after subcutaneous injection in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of the two formulations in breast cancer patients. Methods : From January 2014 to June 2018, electronic medical records of patients with stage I-III breast cancer who received trastuzumab as an adjuvant therapy were reviewed retrospectively. We evaluated the incidence rate and severity of adverse reactions between the intravenous injection group (group IV) and the subcutaneous injection group (group SC). We also analyzed patients switching from IV to SC, or vice versa. Results : A total of 180 patients (108 patients in the IV group, 72 patients in the SC group) were evaluated. Adverse reactions occurred in 94 patients (87.0%) in the IV group and 62 patients (86.1%) in the SC group (p=0.858). There were no significant differences in the incidence and severity of most adverse reactions, except for infusion-related or injection site reactions, which was 16 patients (14.8%) in group IV versus 0 in group SC (p<0.001). In the IV group, 19 patients switched to SC. The most common reasons for switch were preferences (six patients, 31.6%). On the other hand, there was no patient who switched from SC to IV. Conclusion : The two injection formulation did not show significant difference in the frequency of adverse reactions, but injection-related reactions or injection site reactions occurred significantly in the IV group, unlike the pre-marketing study results. Considering the advantages of the SC formulation, such as preference, the SC formulation is an advantageous treatment alternative to the IV formulation.

Abstract

Background : A subcutaneous trastuzumab formulation has been developed as an alternative to the intravenous formulation. Although the safety of the two formulations was similar, some adverse reactions such as surgical wound infection and infusion-related reaction were more common after subcutaneous injection in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of the two formulations in breast cancer patients. Methods : From January 2014 to June 2018, electronic medical records of patients with stage I-III breast cancer who received trastuzumab as an adjuvant therapy were reviewed retrospectively. We evaluated the incidence rate and severity of adverse reactions between the intravenous injection group (group IV) and the subcutaneous injection group (group SC). We also analyzed patients switching from IV to SC, or vice versa. Results : A total of 180 patients (108 patients in the IV group, 72 patients in the SC group) were evaluated. Adverse reactions occurred in 94 patients (87.0%) in the IV group and 62 patients (86.1%) in the SC group (p=0.858). There were no significant differences in the incidence and severity of most adverse reactions, except for infusion-related or injection site reactions, which was 16 patients (14.8%) in group IV versus 0 in group SC (p<0.001). In the IV group, 19 patients switched to SC. The most common reasons for switch were preferences (six patients, 31.6%). On the other hand, there was no patient who switched from SC to IV. Conclusion : The two injection formulation did not show significant difference in the frequency of adverse reactions, but injection-related reactions or injection site reactions occurred significantly in the IV group, unlike the pre-marketing study results. Considering the advantages of the SC formulation, such as preference, the SC formulation is an advantageous treatment alternative to the IV formulation.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Waller CF, "Intravenous and subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab, and trastuzumab biosimilars : implications for clinical practice", Br J Cancer, 124(8), pp.1346~1352 (2021)
  2. Loibl S, "HER2-positive breast cancer", Lancet, 389(10087), pp.2415~2429 (2017)
  3. Martin M, "Emerging Therapeutic Options for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer", Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 35, pp.e64~70 (2016)
  4. Van den Nest M, "The comparative efficacy and risk of harms of the intravenous and subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer : a rapid review", Syst Rev, 8(1), pp.321~ (2019)
  5. "Product information: HERCEPTIN(R) for inravenous use", Genentech, Inc. (per manufacturer), ~ (2021)
  6. "CHMP assessment report: Herceptin(R)" (2013)[URL]
  7. "Drug approval package: HERCEPTIN HYLECTA(R)" (2019)[URL]
  8. "Product information: HERCEPTIN HYLECTA(R) for subcutaneous use", Genentech, Inc. (per manufacturer), ~ (2019)
  9. Ismael G, "Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of(neo)adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive, clinical stage I-III breast cancer(HannaH study) : a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial", Lancet Oncol, 13(9), pp.869~878 (2012)
  10. Jackisch C, "Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Trastuzumab for Patients With ERBB2-Positive Early Breast Cancer ; Final Analysis of the HannaH Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial", JAMA Oncol, 5(5), pp.e190339~ (2019)
  11. Jackisch C, "Subcutaneous versus intravenous formulation of trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer : updated results from the phase III HannaH study", Annals of Oncology, 26(2), pp.320~325 (2015)
  12. Pivot X, "Patients’preferences for subcutaneous trastuzumab versus conventional intravenous infusion for the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer : final analysis of 488 patients in the international, randomized, two-cohort PrefHer study", Ann Oncol, 25(10), pp.1979~1987 (2014)
  13. Gligorov J, "Switching between intravenous and subcutaneous trastuzumab : Safety results from the PrefHer trial", The Breast, 34, pp.89~95 (2017)
  14. Pivot X, "Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous trastuzumab and intravenous trastuzumab as part of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer : Final analysis of the randomised, two-cohort PrefHer study", European Journal of Cancer, 86, pp.82~90 (2017)
  15. Ciruelos EM, "Phase III study to evaluate patient’s preference of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients : Results from the ChangHER study(GEICAM", 2012-07), 2020, pp.29(4), e13253~
  16. Tjalma WAA, "Subcutaneous trastuzumab(Herceptin)versus intravenous trastuzumab for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer : A time, motion and cost assessment study in a lean operating day care oncology unit", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 221, pp.46~51 (2018)
  17. "CTCAE ver 4.0" (2009)[URL]
  18. "ICH harmonized tripartite guideline. Clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting E2A" (1994)[URL]
  19. Pivot X, "Patients’preference of trastuzumab administration(subcutaneous versus intravenous)in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer : Results of the randomised MetaspHer study", Eur J Cancer, 82, pp.230~236 (2017)
  20. Rojas L, "Cost-minimization analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab administration in Chilean patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer", PLoS One, 15(2), pp.e0227961~ (2020)
  21. Lopez-Vivanco G, "Cost minimization analysis of treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in Spain", Clin Transl Oncol, 19(12), pp.1454~1461 (2017)
  22. Wardley A, "Flexible care in breast cancer", ESMO Open, 6(1), pp.100007~ (2021)
  23. Denys H, "Safety and tolerability of subcutaneous trastuzumab at home administration, results of the phase IIIb open-label BELIS study in HER2-positive early breast cancer", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 181(1), pp.97~105 (2020)
  24. "A Study of SC Administration of Trastuzumab (Herceptin)by SID at Home in HER2-Positive EBC Participants (HOMERUS)" (2019)[URL]
  25. Dent S, "A multidisciplinary perspective on the subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer", Curr Oncol, 26(1), pp.e70~80 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

유방암 환자에서의 trastuzumab 주입관련반응 발생률 및 위험인자 분석김순주, 김유진, 나현오, 박애령, 여미진, 정지혜, 황보신이한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2018 · 제35권 제2호Real-World Evidence of Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Docetaxel Combination as a First-Line Treatment for Korean Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer김지연, 김홍식, 박연희, 안진석, 이민상, 이용표, 임영혁대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2022 · 제54권 제4호Real World Evidence of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/Carboplatin/Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab (TCHP) in Patients with HER2-Positive Early or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Single-Institutional Clinical Experience김석원, 김지연, 남석진, 박연희, 안진석, 유재민, 유종한, 이세경, 이정언, 임영혁, 채병주대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2022 · 제54권 제4호Cetuximab 주입관련반응의 발생 빈도 및 관련 인자 분석강민경, 곽혜선, 김희세, 송영천, 장호석, 허영설한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2013 · 제30권 제1호A Real-world Efficacy of Nab-paclitaxel Monotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer김미소, 김세현, 김정선, 김지현, 김태용, 박소연, 박인애, 서경진, 우고운, 유한석, 이경훈, 이대원, 임석아, 한세원대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2022 · 제54권 제2호HER2 양성 유방암의 진단과 치료이수이대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2025 · 제100권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)