Cetuximab 주입관련반응의 발생 빈도 및 관련 인자 분석
Frequency and Related Factors Analysis of Cetuximab Infusion Reactions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Monoclonal antibody treatments can result in severe infusion reactions. Among these, cetuximab, mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibody reported 15~20% infusion reactions (severe infusion reactions 3~5%). However, there are no actual reported incidences in Korea, and little information regarding the prevention, management or outcomes of infusion reactions. This study represents one of the first attempts to describe the clinical consequences regarding the incidence rates of infusion reactions, effect of premedication and test dose. A retrospective chart review was conducted in Asan Medical Center. Eligible patients were treated with cetuximab as either single agents or in combination with additional chemotherapy. Case searches were conducted by electronic medical records from June 2006 to October 2010. Source documents were evaluated for infusion reactions based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version3.0 (CTCAE v3.0). A total of 336 patients (215 men and 121 women) with the mean age of 56 years (27-76 years) were enrolled in this study. 11 patients were identified with infusion reactions. Mild and moderate infusion reactions are 9 (≤grade2, 3.3%) and severe infusion reactions are 2 (grade4, 0.6%). In premedication, 7 of 285 patients (2.5%) who received antihistamine were identified with a infusion reaction, while 4 of 51 patients (15.2%) who received antihistamine and corticosteroid (p=0.63). 4 of 84 patients (4.8%) treated with monotherapy and 7 of 252 patients (2.8%) treated with combination therapy suffered from infusion reaction (p=0.712). Patients with the administration of test dose (n = 49) experienced infusion reactions were 5 people. Further, 3 of these 5 patients (60%) were identified with infusion reactions at the main dose, not test dose. In addition, 6 patients of the past 2 mg/ml formulation with the unfiltered group (n = 288) (2.1%) and 5 patients of the present 5 mg/ml of the formulation was filtered (n = 48) (10%) were identified with a infusion reactions (p=0.915). It was difficult to find significant factors relating to the infusion reactions because incidences of cetuximab infusion reactions were lower than the previously reported. However, we found that antihistamine with corticosteroids as a premedication tended to reduce infusion reactions and the test dose is not valid.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibody treatments can result in severe infusion reactions. Among these, cetuximab, mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibody reported 15~20% infusion reactions (severe infusion reactions 3~5%). However, there are no actual reported incidences in Korea, and little information regarding the prevention, management or outcomes of infusion reactions. This study represents one of the first attempts to describe the clinical consequences regarding the incidence rates of infusion reactions, effect of premedication and test dose. A retrospective chart review was conducted in Asan Medical Center. Eligible patients were treated with cetuximab as either single agents or in combination with additional chemotherapy. Case searches were conducted by electronic medical records from June 2006 to October 2010. Source documents were evaluated for infusion reactions based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version3.0 (CTCAE v3.0). A total of 336 patients (215 men and 121 women) with the mean age of 56 years (27-76 years) were enrolled in this study. 11 patients were identified with infusion reactions. Mild and moderate infusion reactions are 9 (≤grade2, 3.3%) and severe infusion reactions are 2 (grade4, 0.6%). In premedication, 7 of 285 patients (2.5%) who received antihistamine were identified with a infusion reaction, while 4 of 51 patients (15.2%) who received antihistamine and corticosteroid (p=0.63). 4 of 84 patients (4.8%) treated with monotherapy and 7 of 252 patients (2.8%) treated with combination therapy suffered from infusion reaction (p=0.712). Patients with the administration of test dose (n = 49) experienced infusion reactions were 5 people. Further, 3 of these 5 patients (60%) were identified with infusion reactions at the main dose, not test dose. In addition, 6 patients of the past 2 mg/ml formulation with the unfiltered group (n = 288) (2.1%) and 5 patients of the present 5 mg/ml of the formulation was filtered (n = 48) (10%) were identified with a infusion reactions (p=0.915). It was difficult to find significant factors relating to the infusion reactions because incidences of cetuximab infusion reactions were lower than the previously reported. However, we found that antihistamine with corticosteroids as a premedication tended to reduce infusion reactions and the test dose is not valid.
참고문헌 (13)
- Xue Song, "Systemic Review on infusion reactions associated with chemotherapies and monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer", Curr Clin Pharmacol, 7, pp.56~65 (2012)
- Chung C.H., "Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-a-1,3-galactose", N Engl J Med, 358, pp.1109~1117 (2008)
- Chung C.H., "Infusion reactions to monoclonal antibodies for solid tumors: Immunologic mechanisms and risk factors", Oncology, 23(2Suppl 1), pp.14~17 (2009)
- Lenz H.-J., "Management and preparedness for infusion and hypersensitivity reactions", The Oncologist, 12, pp.601~609 (2007)
- Christine H. Chung, "Managing premedications and the risk for reactions to infusional monoclonal antibody therapy", The Oncologist, 13, pp.725~732 (2008)
- Dillman R.O., "Infusion reactions associated with the therapeutic use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of malignancy", Cancer Metastasis Rev, 18, pp.465~471 (1999)
- [URL]
- Vermorken J.B., "Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and", or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy, 2007, pp.25, 2171~2177
- Patel D.D., "Cetuximab associated infusion reactions: pathology and management", Oncology, 20, pp.1373~1382 (2006)
- Siena S., "Reduced incidence of infusion-related reactions in metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment with cetuximab plus irinotecan with combined corticosteroid and antihistamine premedication", Cancer, 116(7), pp.1827~1837 (2010)
- "Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0"[URL]
- Wilke H., "Impact of premediaction on the frequency of infusion related reactions (IRRs) and efficacy in patients (pts) treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): the MABEL study", Eur J Cancer, 5(4), pp.243~ (2007)
- American Pharmacists Association, "Drug information handbook with international trade names index", pp.317~319 (2011)
