본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Theory on the Association between Audit Quality and the Accuracy and Dispersion of Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this study, we establish a link between audit quality and various characteristics of analysts’ earnings forecasts (i.e., accuracy and dispersion) and present theory which suggests that the audit quality enhances the market’s earnings expectation. Our proposition is that enhancing audit quality improves the quality of accounting numbers, which in turn affects analysts’ forecasting ability. Although prior empirical studies investigated this relation by using various proxies, none of them directly show the relation with theoretical base. In this paper, we model that accounting earnings are in autoregressive process and influenced by earnings shock. The earnings shock is composed of unpredictable random shock and accounting errors. Then we show that high-quality audit can reduce the accounting errors which in turn influence the analysts’ earnings forecasts. The model’s predictions are: (1) forecast accuracy is higher, and (2) forecast dispersion is smaller for firms audited by high-quality auditor. These theoretical predictions are largely consistent with empirical findings in prior studies, especially a recent study of Behn et al. (2008).

Abstract

In this study, we establish a link between audit quality and various characteristics of analysts’ earnings forecasts (i.e., accuracy and dispersion) and present theory which suggests that the audit quality enhances the market’s earnings expectation. Our proposition is that enhancing audit quality improves the quality of accounting numbers, which in turn affects analysts’ forecasting ability. Although prior empirical studies investigated this relation by using various proxies, none of them directly show the relation with theoretical base. In this paper, we model that accounting earnings are in autoregressive process and influenced by earnings shock. The earnings shock is composed of unpredictable random shock and accounting errors. Then we show that high-quality audit can reduce the accounting errors which in turn influence the analysts’ earnings forecasts. The model’s predictions are: (1) forecast accuracy is higher, and (2) forecast dispersion is smaller for firms audited by high-quality auditor. These theoretical predictions are largely consistent with empirical findings in prior studies, especially a recent study of Behn et al. (2008).

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Abarbanell, J., "Fundamental Analysis, Future Earnings, and Stock Prices", Journal of Accounting Research, 35, pp.1~24 (1997)
  2. Abarbanell, J., "Can Stock Recommendations Predict Earnings Management and Analysts’ Earnings Forecast Errors", Journal of Accounting Research, 41(March), pp.1~31 (2003)
  3. Abdel-khalik, A. R., "Research Opportunities in Auditing: The Second Decade. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association ?Auditing Section", ~ (1988)
  4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, "Professional Standards Volume 1. New York: AICPA", ~ (1985)
  5. Balsam, S., "Auditor Industry Specialization and Earnings Quality", Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(March), pp.71~97 (2003)
  6. Becker, C., "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management", Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(Spring), pp.1~24 (1998)
  7. Behn, B., "Audit Quality and Properties of Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts", The Accounting Review, 83(April), pp.327~349 (2008)
  8. Brown, L. D., "An Information Interpretation of Financial Analyst Superiority in Forecasting Earnings", Journal of Accounting Research, 25(Spring), pp.49~67 (1987)
  9. Cheng, Q., "Equity Incentives and Earnings Management", The Accounting Review, 80(April), pp.441~476 (2005)
  10. Craswell, A., "Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(December), pp.297~322 (1995)
  11. Das, S., "Earnings Predictability and Bias in Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts", The Accounting Review, 73(April), pp.277~294 (1998)
  12. Datar, S. M., "The Role of Audits and Audit Quality in Valuing New Issues", of Accounting and Economics, 14, pp.3~49 (1991)
  13. Davidson, R.A., "A Note on the Association between Audit Firm Size and Audit Quality", Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(Spring), pp.479~488 (1993)
  14. DeAngelo, L. E., "Auditor Size and Audit Quality", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13(December), pp.183~199 (1981)
  15. DeFond, M. L., "Factors Related to Auditor-Client Disagreements over Income-Increasing Accounting Methods", Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(Spring), pp.415~431 (1993)
  16. Degeorge, F., "Earnings Management to Exceed Thresholds", Journal of Business, 72, pp.1~33 (1999)
  17. Eames, M., "Earnings Predictability and the Directing of Analysts’ Earnings Forecast Errors", The Accounting Review, 78(July), pp.707~724 (2003)
  18. Ferguson, A., "The Effects of Firm-Wide and Office Level Industry Expertise on Audit Pricing", The Accounting Review, 78(April), pp.429~449 (2003)
  19. Financial Accounting Standards Board,Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises, "Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises (1978), Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 1, Norwalk, CT", ~ (1978)
  20. Francis, J., "Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism", Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(Spring), pp.135~165 (1995)
  21. Francis, J., "Does Size Matter? The Influence of Large Clients on Office-level Auditor Reporting Decisions", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(December), pp.375~400 (2000)
  22. Francis, J., "The Pricing of National and City-specific Reputation for Industry Expertise in the U.S. Audit Market", The Accounting Review, 80(January), pp.113~136 (2005)
  23. Holthausen R., "The Relevance of the Value-106 Seoul Journal of Business", ~ (2001)
  24. "relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(September), 3-75", ~
  25. Hwang, L., "Loss Firms and Analysts’ Earnings Forecast Errors", Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 1(Winter), pp.18~31 (1996)
  26. Khurana, I. K., "Litigation Risk and the Financial Reporting Credibility of Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 Audits: Evidence from Anglo-American Countries", The Accounting Review, 79(April), pp.473~495 (2004)
  27. Krishnan, G., "Audit Quality and the Pricing of Discretionary Accruals", Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(March), pp.109~126 (2003)
  28. Kross, W., "Earnings Expectations: the Analysts’ Information Advantage", The Accounting Review, 65(April), pp.461~476 (1990)
  29. Lang, M., "Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior", The Accounting Review, 71(October), pp.467~492 (1996)
  30. Matsumoto, D., "Management’s Incentives to Avoid Negative Earnings Surprises", The Accounting Review, 77(3), pp.483~514 (2002)
  31. Palmrose, Z-V., "An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality", The Accounting Review, 63(January), pp.55~73 (1988)
  32. Payne, J. L., "Earnings Management: The Effect of Ex-ante Earnings Expectations", Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 15, pp.371~392 (2000)
  33. Richardson, S., "The Walk-down to Beatable Analyst Forecasts: The Role of Equity Issuance and Insider Trading Incentives", Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(Winter), pp.885~924 (2004)
  34. Teoh, S. H., "Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient", The Accounting Review, 68(April), pp.346~366 (1993)
  35. Wallace, W. A., "The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets. Aid to Education Program. Touche Ross & Co. Watkins, A. L., W. Hillison and S. E. Morecroft (2004), Audit Quality: A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence, Journ", ~ (2004)
  36. Watts, R. L., "Positive Accounting Theory" (1986), Prentice-Hall

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)