Auditor size and analysts’ earnings forecast accuracy: The moderating effect of earnings manipulation
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study offers an alternative explanation for the positive relation between auditor size and accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts. Utilizing a U.S. dataset, this study reaffirms the robustness of this well-established relation, even when employing a more recent dataset and a staggered difference-in-difference approach. Specifically, analysts’ earnings forecast accuracy improves when auditors switch from non-Big N to Big N, and vice versa. More crucially, this paper introduces novel evidence demonstrating that this relation is consistently and positively moderated by conventional proxies for earnings management. These proxies encompass firms’ management of real activities and the subsequent restatement of inflated earnings. Further analyses reveal that this relation is negatively moderated by external scrutiny applied by both analysts and auditors. In contrast, I do not find evidence indicating that the relation is similarly moderated by proxies related to downward management guidance. These results suggest that, at least within a subset of Big N clients, there appears to be a tendency for engaging in upward earnings management to meet earnings benchmarks, while downward management guidance does not significantly contribute to the accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts.
Abstract
This study offers an alternative explanation for the positive relation between auditor size and accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts. Utilizing a U.S. dataset, this study reaffirms the robustness of this well-established relation, even when employing a more recent dataset and a staggered difference-in-difference approach. Specifically, analysts’ earnings forecast accuracy improves when auditors switch from non-Big N to Big N, and vice versa. More crucially, this paper introduces novel evidence demonstrating that this relation is consistently and positively moderated by conventional proxies for earnings management. These proxies encompass firms’ management of real activities and the subsequent restatement of inflated earnings. Further analyses reveal that this relation is negatively moderated by external scrutiny applied by both analysts and auditors. In contrast, I do not find evidence indicating that the relation is similarly moderated by proxies related to downward management guidance. These results suggest that, at least within a subset of Big N clients, there appears to be a tendency for engaging in upward earnings management to meet earnings benchmarks, while downward management guidance does not significantly contribute to the accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts.
참고문헌 (51)
- Abarbanell, J. S., "Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices", Journal of Accounting Research, 35(1), pp.1~24 (1997)
- Agrawal, A., "Management turnover and governance changes following the revelation of fraud", The Journal of Law and Economics, 42(S1), pp.309~342 (1999)
- Alford, A. W., "A simultaneous equations analysis of forecast accuracy, analyst following, and trading volume", Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 14(3), pp.219~240 (1999)
- Evidence of a nonlinear association between auditor-provided non-audit services and audit quality, "Beardsley, E.", ~ (2018)
- Beatty R. P., "Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings", The Accounting Review, 64(4), pp.693~709 (1989)
- Becker, G, "Crime and punishment: An economic approach", Journal of Political Economics, 76, pp.169~217 (1986)
- Becker, C. L., "The effect of audit quality on earnings management", Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), pp.1~24 (1998)
- Behn, B. K., "Audit quality and properties of analyst earnings forecasts", The Accounting Review, 83(2), pp.327~349 (2008)
- Bhojraj, S., "Making sense of cents: An examination of firms that marginally miss or beat analyst forecasts", Journal of Finance, 64(5), pp.2361~2388 (2009)
- Brown, L. D., "Managers’ forecast guidance of analysts: International evidence", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(4), pp.280~299 (2005)
- Bradshaw, M. T., "Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals?", Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), pp.45~74 (2001)
- Burgstahler, D., "Management of earnings and analysts’ forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises", Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(5-6), pp.633~652 (2006)
- Call, A. C., "Short-term earnings guidance and accrual-based earnings management", Review of Accounting Studies, 19(2), pp.955~987 (2014)
- Chang, H. S., "Do Analysts understand the economic and reporting complexities of derivatives?", The Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2-3), pp.584~604 (2016)
- Chi, W., "Is enhanced audit quality associated with greater real earnings management?", Accounting Horizons, 25(2), pp.315~335 (2011)
- Clinch, G., "Audit quality and information asymmetry between traders", Accounting and Finance, 52(3), pp.743~765 (2012)
- Cohen, D. A., "Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods", The Accounting Review, 83(3), pp.757~787 (2008)
- Cotter, J., "Expectations management and beatable targets: How do analysts react to explicit earnings guidance?", Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(3), pp.593~624 (2006)
- Chaney, P. K., "Self-selection of auditor and audit pricing in private firms", The Accounting Review, 79(1), pp.51~72 (2004)
- Choi, J., "Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality?", Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), pp.115~140 (2010)
- Das, S., "Quarterly earnings patterns and earnings management", Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), pp.797~831 (2009)
- DeAngelo, L. E, "Auditor size and audit quality", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp.183~199 (1981)
- Dechow, P. M., "Predicting material accounting misstatements", Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), pp.17~82 (2011)
- Dechow, P. M., "Why are earnings kinky? An examination of the earnings management explanation", Review of Accounting Studies, 8(2-3), pp.355~384 (2003)
- Dechow, P. M., "Detecting earnings management", The Accounting Review, 70(2), pp.193~225 (1995)
- DeFond, M., "Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect?", New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63(11), pp.3628~3649 (2017)
- Degeorge, F., "Earnings management to exceed thresholds", The Journal of Business, 72(1), pp.1~33 (1999)
- Drake, M. S., "Analysts’ accrual-related over-optimism: do analyst characteristics play a role?", Review of Accounting Studies, 16(1), pp.59~88 (2011)
- Gao, H., "Employee turnover likelihood and earnings management: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine", Review of Accounting Studies, 23, pp.1424~1470 (2018)
- Graham, J. R., "The economic implications of corporate financial reporting", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1), pp.3~73 (2005)
- Heckman, J, "Sample selection bias as a specification error", Econometrica, 47(1), pp.153161~ (1979)
- Hosmer, D. W., "Applied logistic regression" (2013), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- Hovakimian, A., "US analyst regulation and the earnings forecast bias around the world", European Financial Management, 20(3), pp.435~461 (2014)
- Jiang, J., "Big N auditors and audit quality: New evidence from quasi-experiments", The Accounting Review, 94(1), pp.205~227 (2019)
- Lawrence, A., "Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics?", The Accounting Review, 86(1), pp.259~286 (2011)
- McAnally, M. L., "Executive stock options, missed earnings targets, and earnings management", The Accounting Review, 83(1), pp.185~216 (2008)
- Myers, J. N., "Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation?", The Accounting Review, 78(3), pp.779~799 (2003)
- Nguyen, L., "The undesirable effect of audit quality: Evidence from firm innovation", The British Accounting Review, 52(6), pp.100938~ (2020)
- Petersen, M. A, "Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches", Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), pp.435~480 (2009)
- Piot, C., "External auditors, audit committee and earnings management in France", European Accounting Review, 16(2), pp.429~454 (2007)
- Poirier, D. J, "Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models", Journal of Econometrics, 12(2), pp.209~217 (1980)
- Richardson, S., "The walk-down to beatable analyst forecasts: The role of equity issuance and insider trading incentives", Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4), pp.885~924 (2004)
- Richardson, V. J, "Information asymmetry and earnings management: Some evidence", Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15, pp.325~347 (2000)
- Roychowdhury, S, "Earnings management through real activities manipulation", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), pp.335~370 (2006)
- Samuels, D., "The economics of misreporting and the role of public scrutiny", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71(1), pp.101340~ (2020)
- Schipper, K, "Analysts’ forecasts", Accounting Horizons, 5(4), pp.105~121 (1991)
- Teoh, S. H., "Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient", The Accounting Review, 68(2), pp.346~366 (1993)
- Yu, F, "Analyst coverage and earnings management", Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), pp.245~271 (2008)
- Wallace, W. A, "The economic role of the audit in free and regulated markets: A look back and a look forward", Research in Accounting Regulation, 17, pp.267~298 (2004)
- Zang, A. Y., "Evidence on the trade-off between real-activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management", The Accounting Review, 87(2), pp.675~703 (2012)
- Zmijewski, M. E, "Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models", Journal of Accounting Research, 21(1), pp.59~82 (1984)
