본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Dynamic Heterogeneous Choice Heuristics: A Bayesian Hidden Markov Mixture Model Approach

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Standard choice models implicitly assume that consumers, in order to maximize their expected utilities, compare each of the alternatives in their choice sets in terms of all available attributes. Consumer-level utility functions are frequently taken as linear, and overwhelmingly so as compensatory. However, due to limitations in information process capacity,characteristics of choice task environment and other internal or external constraints, consumers may search for satisfying alternatives rather than optimal ones by invoking other non-compensatory heuristics which free them from arduous attribute-by-attribute comparison. The question arises as to how often these non-compensatory rules are applied, and whether researchers can detect them using only standard data sources. This study aims to address two main issues regarding consumers’ use of decision-rules and heuristics in the real world: (1) whether they are heterogeneous across consumers and (2) whether they are changing for individual consumers over time. To these ends, we extend the standard linear compensatory rule assumption to more faithfully capture dynamic heuristic usage for each consumer. There are three reference heuristics studied in this paper, the well-known linear compensatory, disjunctive and conjunctive rules. Conditional on this known set of possible heuristics, a dynamic heterogeneous hidden Markov mixture choice model is developed to capture heuristic dynamics at the individual-level. When estimated on detergent scanner data, the proposed model offers strong evidence supporting both heterogeneity and dynamics in heuristics usage.

Abstract

Standard choice models implicitly assume that consumers, in order to maximize their expected utilities, compare each of the alternatives in their choice sets in terms of all available attributes. Consumer-level utility functions are frequently taken as linear, and overwhelmingly so as compensatory. However, due to limitations in information process capacity,characteristics of choice task environment and other internal or external constraints, consumers may search for satisfying alternatives rather than optimal ones by invoking other non-compensatory heuristics which free them from arduous attribute-by-attribute comparison. The question arises as to how often these non-compensatory rules are applied, and whether researchers can detect them using only standard data sources. This study aims to address two main issues regarding consumers’ use of decision-rules and heuristics in the real world: (1) whether they are heterogeneous across consumers and (2) whether they are changing for individual consumers over time. To these ends, we extend the standard linear compensatory rule assumption to more faithfully capture dynamic heuristic usage for each consumer. There are three reference heuristics studied in this paper, the well-known linear compensatory, disjunctive and conjunctive rules. Conditional on this known set of possible heuristics, a dynamic heterogeneous hidden Markov mixture choice model is developed to capture heuristic dynamics at the individual-level. When estimated on detergent scanner data, the proposed model offers strong evidence supporting both heterogeneity and dynamics in heuristics usage.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Amemiya, T., "Advanced Econometrics" (1986), Basil Blackwell Ltd
  2. Andrews, R. L., "Feature-based Elimination: Model and Empirical Comparison", European Journal of Operational Research, 111, pp.248~267 (1998)
  3. Bernardo, J. M., "Bayesian Theory" (1994), Jon Wiley and Sons Ltd
  4. Bettman, J. R., "An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice" (1979), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
  5. Biggs, S. F., "The Effects of Task Size and Similarity on the Decision Behavior of bank Loan Officers", Management Science, 31(8), pp.970~987 (1985)
  6. Bronnenberg, B. J., "Asymmetric Promotion Effects and Brand Positioning", Marketing Science, 15(4), pp.379~394 (1996)
  7. Chiang, J., "Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Models of Consideration Set and Parameter Heterogeneity", Journal of Econometrics, 89, pp.223~248 (1999)
  8. Gaudry, M. J. I., "The Dogit Model", Transportation Research, Series B, 13B, pp.105~111 (1979)
  9. Gensch, D. H., "A Two-Stage Disaggregate Attribute Choice Model", Marketing Science, 6, pp.223~231 (1987)
  10. Geweke, J., "Evaluating the Accuracy of Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculation of Posterior Moments, In Bayesian Statistics 4", pp.169~193 (1992), Oxford University Press
  11. Gilbride, T. J., "A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules", Marketing Science, 23, pp.391~406 (2004)
  12. Gilbride, T. J., "Estimating Heterogeneous EBA and Economic Screening Rule Choice Models", Marketing Science, 25, pp.494~509 (2006)
  13. Kalyanaram, G., "Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research", Marketing Science, 14(Part 2), pp.161~169 (1995)
  14. Luce, R., "The Choice Axiom After Twenty Years", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp.215~233 (1977)
  15. Manrai, A. K., "Two-Stage Discrete Choice Models for Scanner Panel data: An Assessment of Process and Assumptions", European Journal of Operational Research, 111, pp.193~215 (1998)
  16. Manrai, A. K., "Elimination-By-Cutoffs", Marketing Science, 8, pp.133~152 (1989)
  17. Payne, J. W., "Contingent Decision Behavior", Psychological Bulletin, 92, pp.382~402 (1982)
  18. Payne, J. W., "The Adaptive Decision Maker" (1993), Cambridge university Press
  19. Roberts, J. H., "Development and Testing of A Model of Consideration Set Composition", Journal of Marketing Research, 28, pp.429~440 (1991)
  20. Rubin, D. B., "A Noniterative Sampling", Importance Resampling Alternative to the Data Augmentation Algorithm for Creating a Few Imputations When Fractions of Missing information Are Modest: the SIR Algorithm, comment to a paper by Tanner and Wong, 1987, pp.82, 543~546
  21. Rubin, D. B., "Using the SIR Algorithm to Simulate Posterior Distributions (with discussion), In Bayesian Statistics 3", pp.395~402 (1988), Oxford University Press
  22. Shugan, S. M., "The Cost of Thinking", Journal of Consumer Research, 7, pp.99~111 (1980)
  23. Siddarth, S., "Making the Cut: Modeling and Analyzing Choice Set Restriction in Scanner panel data", Journal of Marketing Research, 32, pp.255~266 (1995)
  24. Swait, J. D., "Empirical Test of a Constrained Choice Discrete Model: Mode Choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil", Transportation Research, Series B, 21B, pp.103~115 (1987)
  25. Simon, H. H., "Models of Man" (1957), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  26. Tversky, A., "Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice", Psychological Review, 3, pp.213~225 (1972)
  27. Wright, P. L., "Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying vs. Optimizing", Journal of Marketing Research, 11, pp.60~67 (1975)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)