본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of Inclusion versus Exclusion on Consideration Set Size: The Moderating Role of Chronic Indecisiveness

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

A great deal of research has explored individuals’ attempts to simplify choices by constructing a consideration set. This research aims to investigate which construction strategy, either inclusion or exclusion, is more likely to be adopted and how the adoption of a particular construction strategy can affect consideration set size while identifying the moderating role of chronic indecisiveness in the construction process. The findings of Study 1 indicate that individuals are more likely to adopt an inclusion strategy to reduce a consideration set to a more manageable size, and that an exclusion strategy results in a larger consideration set. In Study 2, the findings reveal that high-indecisiveness individuals are less likely than low-indecisiveness individuals to select an inclusion strategy, but that high-indecisiveness individuals adopting an inclusion strategy are able to reduce the number of alternatives in a consideration set to a manageable size on par with the size of a consideration set formed by low-indecisiveness individuals without elevating the level of perceived difficulty. The current research contributes to the stream of research on consideration set construction and indecisiveness, and offers useful practical implications for overcoming indecisiveness. Limitations and avenues for further research are also discussed.

Abstract

A great deal of research has explored individuals’ attempts to simplify choices by constructing a consideration set. This research aims to investigate which construction strategy, either inclusion or exclusion, is more likely to be adopted and how the adoption of a particular construction strategy can affect consideration set size while identifying the moderating role of chronic indecisiveness in the construction process. The findings of Study 1 indicate that individuals are more likely to adopt an inclusion strategy to reduce a consideration set to a more manageable size, and that an exclusion strategy results in a larger consideration set. In Study 2, the findings reveal that high-indecisiveness individuals are less likely than low-indecisiveness individuals to select an inclusion strategy, but that high-indecisiveness individuals adopting an inclusion strategy are able to reduce the number of alternatives in a consideration set to a manageable size on par with the size of a consideration set formed by low-indecisiveness individuals without elevating the level of perceived difficulty. The current research contributes to the stream of research on consideration set construction and indecisiveness, and offers useful practical implications for overcoming indecisiveness. Limitations and avenues for further research are also discussed.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Bettman, James R., "An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice" (1979), Addison Wesley
  2. Bettman, James R., "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes", Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), pp.187~217 (1998)
  3. Chakravarti, Amitav, "The Influence of Macro-Level Motives on Consideration Set Composition in Novel Purchase Situations", Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), pp.244~258 (2003)
  4. Crites, John O., "Vocational Psychology:The Study of Vocational Behavior and Development" (1969), McGrawHill
  5. Danan, Eric, "Are Preferences Complete? An Experimental Measurement of Indecisiveness under Risk", Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-01 (2006), Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group
  6. Dhar, Ravi, "Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option", Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), pp.215~231 (1997)
  7. Diehl, Kristin, "Smart Agents : When Lower Search Costs for Quality Information Increase Price Sensitivity", Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), pp.56~71 (2003)
  8. Förster, Jens, "The Effect of Global versus Local Processing Styles on Assimilation versus Contrast in Social Judgment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, pp.579~599 (2008)
  9. Frost, Randy O., "The Nature and Measurement of Compulsive Indecisiveness", Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(7), pp.683~692 (1993)
  10. Steketee, "Indecisiveness and Hoarding", International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 4, pp.253~262 (2011)
  11. Fujita, Kentaro, "Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events", Psychological Science, 17, pp.278~282 (2006)
  12. Gati, Itamar, "A Taxonomy of Difficulties in Career Decision Making", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4), pp.510~526 (1996)
  13. Germeijs, Veerle, "A Measurement Scale for Indecisiveness and Its Relationship to Career Indecision and Other Types of Indecision", European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), pp.113~122 (2002)
  14. Goodman, Joseph K., "Help or Hinder? When Recommendation Signage Expands Consideration Sets and Heightens Decision Difficulty", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), pp.165~174 (2013)
  15. Heller, Daniel, "Selection of Strategies for Narrowing Choice Options : Antecedents and Consequences", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), pp.1194~1213 (2002)
  16. Huber, Vandra L., "Decision Bias and Personnel Selection Strategies", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40(1), pp.136~147 (1987)
  17. Kahneman, Daniel, "Anomalies : The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), pp.193~206 (1991)
  18. Kardes, Frank R., "Brand Retrieval, Consideration Set Composition, Consumer Choice, and the Pioneering Advantage", Journal of Consumer Research, 20, pp.62~73 (1993)
  19. Kreps, David M., "A Representation Theorem for ‘Preference for Flexibility’", Econometrica, 47(3), pp.565~577 (1979)
  20. Laran, Juliano, "Choice, Rejection, and Elaboration on PreferenceInconsistent Alternatives", Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), pp.229~241 (2011)
  21. Levin, Irwin P., "Prescreening of Choice Options in Positive and Negative Decision-Making Tasks", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, pp.279~293 (2001)
  22. Levin, Irwin P., "A Tale of Two Pizzas : Building Up from a Basic Product versus Scaling Down from a Fully-Loaded Product", Marketing Letters, 13(4), pp.335~344 (2002)
  23. Liberman, Nira, "The Effect of Temporal Distance on Level of Construal", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, pp.523~535 (2002)
  24. McDonald, Rachel I., "Would You Rule Out Going Green? The Effect of Inclusion versus Exclusion Mindset on Pro-Environmental Willingness", European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), pp.507~513 (2014)
  25. Meloy, Margaret G., "Binary Choice under Instructions to Select versus Reject", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93(2), pp.114~128 (2004)
  26. Mourali, Mehdi, "The Powerful Select, The Powerless Reject : Power's Influence in Decision Strategies", Journal of Business Research, 66(7), pp.874~880 (2013)
  27. Nagpal, Anish, "Attribute Conflict in Consumer Decision Making : The Role of Task Compatibility", Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), pp.696~705 (2008)
  28. Nedungadi, Prakash, "Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets : Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations", Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), pp.263~276 (1990)
  29. Ordóñez, Lisa D., "Testing the Compatibility Test : How Instructions, Accountability, and Anticipated Regret Affect Prechoice Screening of Options", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(1), pp.63~80 (1999)
  30. Ospiow, Samuel H., "Assessing Career Indecision", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, pp.147~154 (1999)
  31. Park, C. Whan, "Choosing What I Want versus Rejecting What I Do Not Want : An Application of Decision Framing to Product Option Choice Decisions", Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), pp.187~202 (2000)
  32. Patalano, Andrea L., "Indecisiveness and Response to Risk in Deciding When to Decide", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), pp.405~424 (2007)
  33. Patalano, Andrea L., "The Relationship Between Indecisiveness and Eye Movement Patterns in a Decision Making Informational Search Task", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(4), pp.353~368 (2010)
  34. Rassin, Eric, "Indecisiveness and Worst Case Scenario Reasoning", poster presented at the European Conference of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (2004)
  35. Rassin, Eric, "Measuring General Indecisiveness", Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(1), pp.61~68 (2007)
  36. Ratneshwar, Srinivasan, "Toward Understanding the Attraction Effect : The Implications of Product Stimulus Meaningfulness and Familiarity", Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), pp.520~533 (1987)
  37. Ratneshwar, Srinivasan, "Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of AcrossCategory Consideration", Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), pp.240~250 (1996)
  38. Sautua, Santiago I., "Does Uncertainty Cause Inertia in Decision Making? An Experimental Study of the Role of Regret Aversion and Indecisiveness", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 136, pp.1~14 (2017)
  39. Shafir, Eldar, "Choosing versus Rejecting : Why Some Options are Both Better and Worse Than Others", Memory & Cognition, 21(4), pp.546~556 (1993)
  40. Smith Pamela K., "You Focus on the Forest When You’re in Charge of the Trees : Power Priming and Abstract Information Processing", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), pp.578~596 (2006)
  41. Sokolova, Tatiana, "Take It or Leave It : How Choosing versus Rejecting Alternatives Affects Information Processing", Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), pp.614~635 (2016)
  42. Steketee, Gail, "Compulsive Hoarding : Current Status of the Research", Clinical Psychology Review, 23(7), pp.905~927 (2003)
  43. Trope, Yaacov, "Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance", Psychological Review, 117(2), pp.440~463 (2010)
  44. Tse, David K., "Does Culture Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of Executives’ Choice, Decisiveness, and Risk Adjustment in International Marketing", Journal of Marketing, 52, pp.81~95 (1988)
  45. Tversky, Amos, "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice : A Reference-Dependent Model", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), pp.1039~1061 (1991)
  46. Tybout, Alice M., "Information Accessibility as a Moderator of Judgments : The Role of Content versus Retrieval Ease", Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), pp.76~85 (2005)
  47. Wakslak Cheryl J., "Seeing the Forest When Entry is Unlikely : Probability and the Mental Representation of Events", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 135(4), pp.641~653 (2006)
  48. Wang, Mei, "The Impact of Culture on Loss Aversion", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), pp.270~281 (2017)
  49. Wincze, Jeffrey P., "Categorization in Compulsive Hoarding", Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, pp.63~72 (2007)
  50. Yaniv, Ilan, "Elimination and Inclusion Procedures in Judgment", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(3), pp.211~220 (1997)
  51. Yaniv, Ilan, "Acceptance and Elimination Procedures in Choice : Noncomplementarity and the Role of Implied Status Quo", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), pp.293~313 (2000)
  52. Yaniv, Ilan, "Inclusive and Exclusive Modes of Thinking : Studies of Prediction, Preference, and Social Perception During Parliamentary Elections", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(4), pp.352~367 (2002)
  53. Yates, Frank J., "Indecisiveness and Culture : Incidence, Values, and Thoroughness", Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), pp.428~444 (2010)
  54. Zauberman, Gal, "The Intertemporal Dynamics of Consumer Lock-In", Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), pp.405~419 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)