본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Costing Rule and Cost Behavior in the Korean Defense Industry

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper investigates the cost behavior in the Korean defense industry. Managers in the defense industry tend to have motivation to manage earnings because the costs incurring in the production process of defense articles are reimbursed based on cost plus contracts. Results are as follows. First, in the sample of the defense sector, SG&A costs and total manufacturing costs exhibited anti-stickiness whereas labor costs exhibited cost stickiness. Other cost components displayed symmetric cost behavior. Next, in the commercial sector, material costs, direct material costs, total manufacturing costs, cost of goods sold, and total costs exhibited anti-stickiness. Labor costs showed cost stickiness whereas SG&A costs, overhead costs, and indirect production costs had symmetric cost behavior. Overall, the results reveals that the change rate of labor costs of the defense sector exhibits more cost stickiness to changes in sales than the commercial sector.

Abstract

This paper investigates the cost behavior in the Korean defense industry. Managers in the defense industry tend to have motivation to manage earnings because the costs incurring in the production process of defense articles are reimbursed based on cost plus contracts. Results are as follows. First, in the sample of the defense sector, SG&A costs and total manufacturing costs exhibited anti-stickiness whereas labor costs exhibited cost stickiness. Other cost components displayed symmetric cost behavior. Next, in the commercial sector, material costs, direct material costs, total manufacturing costs, cost of goods sold, and total costs exhibited anti-stickiness. Labor costs showed cost stickiness whereas SG&A costs, overhead costs, and indirect production costs had symmetric cost behavior. Overall, the results reveals that the change rate of labor costs of the defense sector exhibits more cost stickiness to changes in sales than the commercial sector.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 안태식, "방위산업 원가계산 및 이윤 산정규칙과 방산업체의 인센티브", 회계저널, 12(2), pp.35~60 (2003), 한국회계학회
  2. Ahn, T. S., "Asymmetrical behavior of manufacturing costs: Korean evidence", Korean Management Review, 33(3), pp.789~807 (2004)
  3. 송승아, "한국제조기업의 비대칭적 원가행태에 대한 재조명", 회계저널, 19(1), pp.253~280 (2010), 한국회계학회
  4. Anderson, M. C., "Are selling, general and administrative costs"sticky"?", Journal of Accounting Research, 41, pp.47~63 (2003)
  5. Understanding cost management : what can we learn from the empirical evidence on ‘sticky costs’?, "Anderson, S. W.", Rice University, ~ (2009)
  6. Balakrishnan, R., "Does capacity utilization affect the"stickiness"of cost?", Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(3), pp.283~299 (2004)
  7. Banker, R. D., "Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost stickiness", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), pp.111~127 (2013)
  8. Calleja, K., "A note on cost stickiness : some international comparisons", Management Accounting Research, 17(2), pp.127~140 (2006)
  9. Demski, J. S., "A perspective on accounting for defense contracts", The Accounting Review, 67(4), pp.732~740 (1992)
  10. Dierynck, B., "Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms", The Accounting Review, 87(4), pp.1219~1246 (2012)
  11. 정형록, "방산업체의 이익조정에 관한 연구", 회계학연구, 32(1), pp.59~88 (2007), 한국회계학회
  12. 고영우, "기업수명주기가 판매관리비의 비대칭적 원가행태에 미치는 영향", 회계ㆍ세무와 감사 연구, (49), pp.283~312 (2009), 한국공인회계사회
  13. Lichtenberg, F. R., "A perspective on accounting for defense contracts", The Accounting Review, 67(4), pp.741~752 (1992)
  14. McGowan, A. S., "The relation between cost shifting and segment profitability in the defense-contracting industry", The Accounting Review, 77(4), pp.949~969 (2002)
  15. 문호은, "원가행태의 비대칭성과 산업별 특성 차이에 대한 종합적 분석", 관리회계연구, 10(1), pp.1~38 (2010), 한국관리회계학회
  16. Reichelstein, S., "Incentives in government contracts", Journal of Public Economics, 24(2), pp.257~270 (1984)
  17. Rogerson, W. P., "Overhead allocation and incentives for cost minimization in defense procurement", The Accounting Review, 67(4), pp.671~690 (1992)
  18. Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs, "Weidenmier, M. L.", Texas Christian University, ~ (2003)
  19. Thomas, J. K., "Cost manipulation incentives under cost reimbursement : pension costs for defense contracts", The Accounting Review, 67(4), pp.691~711 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)