한·중 인칭접미사 ‘-자(者), -가(家), -인(人), -사(師)’의 의미 기능 고찰
The Semantic Function Research of '-자(者), -가（家）, -인（人）, -사（师）' in Korean and Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Most person suffixes in Korean-Chinese characters were derived from china, but some of them came indirectly from Japan. Therefore, knowing the function of Chinese person suffixes is good to understand the semantic function of Korean-Chinese. Person suffixes ‘-자(者), -가（家）, -인（人）, -사（师）'. By using the method of contrastive linguistics, the person suffixes’ similarities and differences of both countries can be revealed. Through the research about the 4 person suffixes’ basic meaning and additional meaning(This research paper just pay attention to the 3 syllables derivatives), the [+technical professionalism] and [+polite form] in semantic meaning express a completely different attribute while in [+knowledge professionalism] they show the same meaning. Korean ‘-자’ is corresponded to Chinese ‘-者’,’-家’ and Korean ‘-인’ is corresponded to Chinese ‘-人’, ‘者’, ‘-家. The semantic area of ‘-자’ and ‘-인’ is wider than ‘-가’ and ‘-사’ in Korean. In addition, in the semantic level of [+polite form], Chinese person suffix ‘-师’ is more polite than Korean ‘-사’ while Korean ‘-자’ is more polite than Chinese ‘-者.
Abstract
Most person suffixes in Korean-Chinese characters were derived from china, but some of them came indirectly from Japan. Therefore, knowing the function of Chinese person suffixes is good to understand the semantic function of Korean-Chinese. Person suffixes ‘-자(者), -가（家）, -인（人）, -사（师）'. By using the method of contrastive linguistics, the person suffixes’ similarities and differences of both countries can be revealed. Through the research about the 4 person suffixes’ basic meaning and additional meaning(This research paper just pay attention to the 3 syllables derivatives), the [+technical professionalism] and [+polite form] in semantic meaning express a completely different attribute while in [+knowledge professionalism] they show the same meaning. Korean ‘-자’ is corresponded to Chinese ‘-者’,’-家’ and Korean ‘-인’ is corresponded to Chinese ‘-人’, ‘者’, ‘-家. The semantic area of ‘-자’ and ‘-인’ is wider than ‘-가’ and ‘-사’ in Korean. In addition, in the semantic level of [+polite form], Chinese person suffix ‘-师’ is more polite than Korean ‘-사’ while Korean ‘-자’ is more polite than Chinese ‘-者.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강두철, "접미사에 대한 연구- 사람을 뜻하는 한자어 접미사를 중심으로", 국문학보, 9, pp.31~ (1989)
- 고영근, "국어접미사의 연구", pp.27~ (1974), 광문사
- 김진호, "현대중국어의 접사연구", 석사, pp.1991
- 김종택, "국어화용론", pp.207~ (1989), 형설출판사
- 노명희, "현대국어 한자어 연구" (2005), 태학사
- 노명희, "구에 결합하는 접미한자어의 의미와 기능", 한국어 의미학, 13, pp.69~96 (2003), 한국어의미학회
- 단방령, "한국어와 중국어 파생접사의 대조 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 박형익, "국어 사전에서의 한자어 접미사와 혼종어 접미사", 한국어학, 21, pp.155~185 (2003), 한국어학회
- 장 위, "人称名词形成和人称名词化研究 国语研究" (2002)
- 정민영, "국어한자어의 어휘형성연구", 박사, pp.1993
- 진정정, "한ㆍ중 인칭 파생 접미사 연구", 석사, pp.2007
- 최윤곤, "한자어 형태 범주와 접사 설정 기준", 동국어문론집, 8, pp.30~ (1999)
- 한 림, "한국어와 중국어의 한자어 접사 비교 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 홍사만, "N류 파생접미사의 의미구조", 인문학총, 11 (1986)
- 홍사만, "국어의미론연구", pp.205~208 (1998), 형설출판사
- 韩陈其, "汉语词缀新论" (2002), 扬州大学学报
- 李 华, "现代汉语表人名词后缀,类后缀考察", 硕士学位论文. 北京语言大学, 33, pp.41~43 (2003)
- 吕叔湘, "汉语语法论文集" (1984), 商务印书馆
- 马庆株, "汉语语义语法范畴问题", pp.163~186 (1998), 北京语言文化大学社
- 孙中远, "‘师’字的源流", pp.57~58 (2002), 大连教育学院学报
- 王云路, "试说古汉语中的词缀‘家’" (2005), 汉语研究
- 王 力, "王力文集(第一卷）" (1984), 山东教育出版社
- 杨信川, "名词后缀的语义等级" (1997), 修辞学习
- 尹海亮, "现代汉语类词缀研究" (2007), 博士学位论文. 山东大学.
- 翟东娜, "'文学者'与'文学家'―谈谈日汉语后缀‘者'和'家'" (2003), 日语知识
- 张新红, "汉语词根词缀化" (2007), 昌吉学院学报
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 한글학회, "우리말 큰 사전" (1991), 어문각
- 이숭녕, "국어대사전" (1995), 삼성문화사
- 辞源编辑委员会, "辞源" (1984), 商務印書館
- 劉興策, "現代漢語雙序詞語匯編" (2003), 武漢大學出版社
- 中国社会科学院现代汉语词典编纂委员会, "现代汉语词典" (2006), 商务印书馆
- 北京金山软件有限公司, "金山词霸" (2007), 汉语大词典