본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성별 범주의 인지적 특성

Cognitive Characteristics of Gender Categories

권영수|박분주
언어과학회 (The Linguistic Science Society)|2018.09|언어과학연구 (The Journal of Linguistics Science)|제86호|pp. 1-20|DOI DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.21296/jls.2018.09.86.1

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

stereotypinggender stereotypemasculine generics스테레오타입화성별 스테레오타입총칭 적인 남성형귀인 오류역동적 스테 레오타입misattributiondynamic stereotype
주제분류언어학

초록

.

Abstract

Gender, as a secondary social category, is reflected in certain language that affects individuals’ perceptions and cognitions. English is a language with a semantic gender system, where gender is determined by reference and meaning. When gender information of person denotations is not definite, speakers tend to use gender stereotypes to infer more precise gender information. Stereotypical gender information about role names are subconsciously incorporated into perceivers’ cognitive representation. The present study investigated how three different age groups of Korean EFL learners perceive gender categories of role names. As a result, it was observed that Korean participants’ perception of gender categorization tends to be sociocultural and psychodynamic. Moreover, variation of responses between age groups was discovered.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Ashmore, Richard., "Cognitive Precesses in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior", pp.219~248 (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum
  2. Braun, Friederike., "Cognitive Effects of Masculine Generics in German: An Overview of Empirical Findings", Communication, 30(1), pp.1~21 (2005)
  3. Brewer, Marilynn, "Perceptions of the Elderly:Stereotypes as Prototypes", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, pp.656~670 (1981)
  4. Corbett, Greville G., "Gender" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  5. Deaux, Kay, "Putting Gender into Context: An Interactive Model of Gender-Related Behavior", Psychological Review, 94, pp.369~389 (1987)
  6. Diekman, Amanda B, "Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs:Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future", PSPB, 26(10), pp.1171~1188 (2000)
  7. Eagly, Alice H., "Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), pp.735~754 (1984)
  8. Foertsch, Julie, "In Search of Gender Neutrality", Psychological Science, 8, pp.106~111 (1997)
  9. Gabriel, Ute, "Can Societal Language Amendments Change Gender Representation? The Case of Norway", Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(5), pp.451~457 (2008)
  10. Gabriel, Ute, "Exchanging the Generic Masculine for Gender-Balanced Forms: The Impact of Context Valence", Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, pp.273~278 (2004)
  11. Gastil, John, "Generic Pronouns and Sexist Language: The Oxymoronic Character of Masculine Generics", Sex Roles, 19, pp.785~799 (1990)
  12. Hamilton, David L., "Illusory Correlation and the Maintenance of Stereotypic Beliefs", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), pp.832~845 (1980)
  13. Hamilton, David L., "Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism", pp.127~163 (1986), Academic Press
  14. Hamilton, Mykol C, "Using Masculine Generics: Does Generic he Increase Male Bias in the User’s Imagery?", Sex Roles, 19, pp.785~799 (1988)
  15. Heise, Elke, "Sind Frauen Mitgemeint? Eine Empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des Generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen", Sprache and Kognition, 19, pp.313~ (2000)
  16. Hellinger, Marlis, "Gender across Languages:The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men", pp.1~25 (2001), Benjamins
  17. Irmen, Lisa, "Gender Markedness of Language: The Impact of Grammatical and Nonlinguistic Information on the Mental Representation of Person Information", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, pp.272~307 (2004)
  18. Irmen, Lisa, "Die Repräsentation Generisch Maskuliner Personenbezeichnungen: Eine Theoretische Integration Bisheriger Befunde", Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, pp.127~132 (2005)
  19. Lemm, Kristi M., "Gender Picture Priming: It Works with Denotative and Cognitive Primes", Social Cognition, 23(3), pp.218~241 (2005)
  20. MacKay, Donald G, "Psychology, Prescriptive Grammar, and the Pronoun Problem", American Psychologist, 35, pp.444~449 (1980)
  21. Martyna, Wendy., "Women and Language in Literature and Society", pp.69~78 (1980), Praeger
  22. Parks, Janet B., "Influence of Age, Gender, and Context on Attitudes toward Sexist", Nonsexist Language; Is Sport a Special Case?, 1998, pp.38, 477~494
  23. Prewitt-Freilino, Jennifer L., "The Gendering of Language; A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages", Sex Roles, 66, pp.268~281 (2012)
  24. Rosch, Eleanor., "Cognition and Categorization", pp.189~206 (1978), Erlbaum
  25. Rothmund, Jutta, "Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand", Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212(1), pp.40~54 (2004)
  26. Ruble, Thomas L., "In the Eye of the Beholder: Contemporary Issues in Stereotyping", pp.339~356 (1980), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
  27. Ryff, Carol D., "The Place of Personality and Social Structure Research in Social Psychology", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), pp.1192~1202 (1987)
  28. Sampson, Edward E., "Cognitive Psychology as Ideology", American Psychologist, 36(7), pp.730~743 (1981)
  29. Sarrasin, Oriane, "Sexism and Attitudes toward Gender-neutral language: The Case of English, French, and German", Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71, pp.113~124 (2012)
  30. Stahlberg, Dagmar., "Social Communication", pp.163~187 (2007), Psychology Press
  31. Todd-Mancillas, William R., "Masculine Generics=Sexist Language: A Review of Literature and Implications for Speech Communication Professionals", Communication Quarterly, 29(2), pp.107~115 (1981)
  32. Wasserman, Benjamin D., "¿Qué? Quoi? Do Languages with Grammatical Gender Promote Sexist Attitudes?", Sex Roles, 61, pp.634~643 (2009)
  33. Weber, Reneé, "Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, pp.961~977 (1983)
  34. Wolff, Phillip, "Linguistic Relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews", Cognitive Science, 2, pp.253~265 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

성별 특성 단어의 자동적 평가효과: 일치성 효과와 긍정성 우위 효과를 중심으로김미라, 오경기, 이재호, 조긍호한국인지과학회 · 인지과학2002 · 제13권 제4호암묵연합과제에 반영된 성별 범주 표상의 성차이재호한국여성심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:여성2007 · 제12권 제1호한국인의 성별 지식의 암묵적 표상: 남녀 범주의 비대칭성방희정, 이재호, 최상진한국여성심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:여성2004 · 제9권 제1호성별 고정관념의 암묵적 표상과 자동적 점화이재호한국여성심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:여성2006 · 제11권 제1호여성의 명시적 암묵적 자아해석에 미치는 성 고정관념의 영향방희정, 조혜자한국여성심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:여성2003 · 제8권 제3호다의어의 인지적 의미 특성임지룡사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학1996 · 제18호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)

The Effect of Creating a Prior Event in Story Telling배정옥, 권영수pp. 21-42近代汉语时期“被”字句感情色彩的量化分析与研究: 以『朱子语类』和『红楼梦』为语料来源리웨이웨이, 장태원pp. 43-68한국어와 태국어의 부치사 문법화에 대한 비교 고찰: 거시적 유형론적 관점에서박경은, 이성하pp. 69-95Cohesive Features in Argumentative Writing by Korean EFL Learners at the Elementary Education Level백주현pp. 97-121At the Borderland of Prepositions: English Complex Prepositions at Incipient Grammaticalization엄수진pp. 123-141
원문 보기