본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신흥 기술의 단계적 벤치마킹을 위한 SOM, DEA와 AHP 방법의 순차 활용

Sequential use of SOM, DEA and AHP method for the stepwise benchmarking of emerging technology

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Emerging technologies have significant implications in establishing competitive advantages and are characterized by continuous rapid development. Efficient benchmarking is more and more important in the development of emerging technologies. Similar input level and importance are two necessary criteria need to be considered for emerging technology's benchmarking. In this study, we proposed a sequential use of self-organizing map(SOM), data envelopment analysis(DEA) and analytical hierarchy process(AHP) method for the stepwise benchmarking of emerging technology. The proposed method uses two-level SOM to cluster the emerging technologies with similar required input levels together, then, in each cluster, uses DEA-BCC model to evaluate the efficiencies of the emerging technologies and do tier analysis to form tiers. On each tier, AHP rating method is used to calculate each emerging technology's importance priority. The optimal benchmarking path of each cluster is established by connecting the emerging technologies with the highest importance priority. In order to validate the proposed method, we apply it to a case of biotechnology. The result shows the proposed method can overcome difficulties in benchmarking, select suitable benchmarking targets and make the benchmarking process more efficient and reasonable.

Abstract

Emerging technologies have significant implications in establishing competitive advantages and are characterized by continuous rapid development. Efficient benchmarking is more and more important in the development of emerging technologies. Similar input level and importance are two necessary criteria need to be considered for emerging technology's benchmarking. In this study, we proposed a sequential use of self-organizing map(SOM), data envelopment analysis(DEA) and analytical hierarchy process(AHP) method for the stepwise benchmarking of emerging technology. The proposed method uses two-level SOM to cluster the emerging technologies with similar required input levels together, then, in each cluster, uses DEA-BCC model to evaluate the efficiencies of the emerging technologies and do tier analysis to form tiers. On each tier, AHP rating method is used to calculate each emerging technology's importance priority. The optimal benchmarking path of each cluster is established by connecting the emerging technologies with the highest importance priority. In order to validate the proposed method, we apply it to a case of biotechnology. The result shows the proposed method can overcome difficulties in benchmarking, select suitable benchmarking targets and make the benchmarking process more efficient and reasonable.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Ainapur, B., "TOC Approach for supply chain performance enhancement", International Journal of Business Research and Management, 2(4), pp.163~178 (2011)
  2. Banker, R., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis", Management Science, 30(9), pp.1078~1092 (1984)
  3. Charnes, A., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), pp.429~444 (1978)
  4. Calinski, R. B., "A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis", Communication in Statistics, 3, pp.1~27 (1974)
  5. Camp, R. C., "Benchmarking: the search for the industry best practice that leads to superior performance" (1989), ASQC Quality Press
  6. de Castro Leo, A., "New developmental stages for common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) using mass and age variables obtained by K-means algorithm and self-organizing maps (SOM)", Computers in Biology and Medicine, 39(10), pp.853~859 (2009)
  7. Duarte P., "Competition and ownership in land passenger transport", 649~658 (2005)
  8. Dewick, P., "Technological change, industry structure and the environment", Futures, 36, pp.267~293 (2004)
  9. Davies, D.L., "A Cluster Separation Measure", IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1, pp.224~227 (1979)
  10. Dunn, J. C., "A Fuzz Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters", Journal of Cybernetics, 3, pp.32~57 (1973)
  11. Godin, N., "Integration of the Kohonen's self-organising map and k-means algorithm for the segmentation of the AE data collected during tensile tests on cross-ply composites", NDT & E International, 38(4), pp.299~309 (2005)
  12. Hall, J., "Social exclusion and transgenic technology: the case of Brazilian agriculture", Journal of Business Ethics, 77(1), pp.45~63 (2008)
  13. Hung, S. C., "Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector", Technovation, 26, pp.104~110 (2006)
  14. Hung, S. C., "Managing TFT-LCDs under uncertainty: When crystal cycles meet business cycles", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, pp.1104~1114 (2011)
  15. Johnson, A., "Large-scale Internet benchmarking: Technology and application in warehousing operations", Computers in Industry, 61, pp.280~286 (2010)
  16. Janssen, R, "Sustainability of bio-fuels in Latin America: risks and opportunities", Energy Policy, 39, pp.5717~5725 (2011)
  17. 김관열, "특허맵과 AHP를 활용한 최적의 LCD 저온폴리실리콘 결정화 기술 선정", 지식경영연구, 12(1), pp.39~52 (2011), 한국지식경영학회
  18. 김순영, "AHP를 이용한 국방연구개발사업 메타평가 지표개발", 지식경영연구, 10(2), pp.65~84 (2009), 한국지식경영학회
  19. Kohonen, T., "The self-organizing map", IEEE Proceeding, 78, pp.1464~1480 (1990)
  20. Kalyani, S., "Particle swarm optimization based K-means clustering approach for security assessment in power systems", Expert Systems with Applications, 38, pp.10839~10846 (2011)
  21. Keehley, P., "Benchmarking for best practices in the public sector" (1997), Jossey Bass
  22. Kline, J. J., "Activity-based costing and benchmarking: a tandem for quality-oriented governments", Journal of Government Financial Management, 52(3), pp.50~54 (2003)
  23. Kuo, R.J., "Integration of self-organizing feature map and K-means algorithm for market segmentation", Computers & Operations Research, 29(11), pp.1475~1493 (2002)
  24. Kuo, R. J., "Integration of self-organizing feature maps neural network and genetic K-means algorithm for market segmentation", Expert Systems with Applications, 30(2), pp.313~324 (2006)
  25. Korpela, J., "Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies", International Journal of Production Economics, 108, pp.135~142 (2007)
  26. Lai, M. C., "Designing a knowledge-based system for benchmarking: a DEA approach", Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, pp.662~671 (2011)
  27. Lim, S. M., "A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA", EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 38(6), pp.7665~7673 (2011), PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
  28. Martin, J. C., "A benchmarking analysis of Spanish commercial airports: A comparison between SMOP and DEA ranking methods", Networks and Spatial Economics, 6(2), pp.111~134 (2006)
  29. Marie Dou, H. J., "Benchmarking R&D and companies through patent analysis using free databases and special software: a tool to improve innovative thinking", World Patent Information, 26, pp.297~309 (2004)
  30. Maulik, U., "Performance Evaluation of Some Clustering Algorithms and Validity Indices", IEEE Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(12), pp.1650~1654 (2002)
  31. Melillo, J. M., "Indirect emissions from bio-fuels: how important?", Science, 326, pp.1327~1400 (2009)
  32. Min, H., "Benchmarking the operational efficiency of third party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis", Supply Chain Management, 11(3), pp.259~265 (2006)
  33. 이스마틸라 노르마토프, "계층분석과정을 이용한 모바일 뱅킹 플랫폼 선정에 관한 연구: 우즈벡 은행을 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 12(3), pp.97~109 (2011), 한국지식경영학회
  34. Saaty, T. L., "The analytic hierarchy process" (1980), McGraw-Hill
  35. Saaty, T.L., "Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, 74(3), pp.426~447 (1994)
  36. Sahoo, S. K., "The present and future of nanotechnology in human health care", Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine, 3, pp.20~31 (2007)
  37. Shaneth, A. E., "A method of stepwise benchmarking for inefficient DMUs based on the proximity-based target selection", Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), pp.11595~11604 (2009), Pergamon Press Ltd.
  38. Shen, Y. C., "A hybrid selection method for emerging technology", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, pp.151~166 (2010)
  39. Seol, H., "A framework for benchmarking service process using data envelopment analysis and decision tree", Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), pp.432~440 (2007)
  40. Seiford, L., "Context-dependent data envelopment analysis-measuring attractiveness and progress", OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 31(5), pp.153~161 (2003)
  41. Simoes da Silva, A.C., "Prioritization of R&D projects in the aerospace sector: AHP method with ratings", Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 2(3), pp.339~348 (2010)
  42. Sueyoshi, T., "A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP", European Journal of Operational Research, 199, pp.219~231 (2009)
  43. van Merkerk, R. O., "Tracing emerging irreversibilities in emerging technologies: the case of nanotubes", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, pp.1094~ (2005)
  44. van der Valk, T., "Conceptualizing patterns in the dynamics of emerging technologies: the case of biotechnology developments in the Netherlands", Technovation, 29, pp.247~264 (2009)
  45. Vesanto, J., "Clustering of the Self-organizing Map", IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 11(3), pp.586~600 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)