개방형 혁신에 의한 R&D 연구의 효율성 평가 분석 : 과학기술적 성과 관점에서 AHP-DEA방법론 적용
Open Innovation R&D Efficiency Evaluation by Integrated AHP‐DEA
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current environment of technological and competitive changes influences not only the business R&D environment but also government driven national R&D strategies. Open innovation has now become an important paradigm that is replacing the outdated paradigm of closed innovation. Many companies and nations have been increasing R&D investment because R&D has been considered a driving force for national and corporate competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the performance of R&D focused on open innovation according to scientific and technological outputs which is based on paper publications, patents and etc. Comparisons should not be only based on the quantity but also on the quality of the output. This paper shows that it is possible to develop DEA models that utilize the Analytical Hierarchical Process in order to transform the qualitative index into a quantitative index. Hence, the relative efficiency for R&D organizations is obtained based on both quantity and quality outputs and subsequently provides comprehensive and realistic methods for decision makers to identify levels of project efficiency.
Abstract
The current environment of technological and competitive changes influences not only the business R&D environment but also government driven national R&D strategies. Open innovation has now become an important paradigm that is replacing the outdated paradigm of closed innovation. Many companies and nations have been increasing R&D investment because R&D has been considered a driving force for national and corporate competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the performance of R&D focused on open innovation according to scientific and technological outputs which is based on paper publications, patents and etc. Comparisons should not be only based on the quantity but also on the quality of the output. This paper shows that it is possible to develop DEA models that utilize the Analytical Hierarchical Process in order to transform the qualitative index into a quantitative index. Hence, the relative efficiency for R&D organizations is obtained based on both quantity and quality outputs and subsequently provides comprehensive and realistic methods for decision makers to identify levels of project efficiency.
참고문헌 (41)
- Bae, J.T., "Development of a performance index in private company R&D activity", Journal of Technology Innovation, 12, pp.45~69 (1998)
- Banker, R.D., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis", Management Science, 30, pp.1078~1092 (1984)
- Berchicci, L., "Towards an open R&D system : Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance", Research Policy, 42, pp.117~127 (2012)
- Bitman, W.R., "A Conceptual Framework for Ranking R&D Projects", Engineering Management, 55, pp.267~278 (2008)
- Charnes, A., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units", European Journal of Operational Research, 3, pp.429~444 (1978)
- Chesbrough, H.W., "Open Innovation : the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology" (2006), Harvard Business school press
- Cho, K.T., "Analytic Hierarchy Decision Making of Proceeding Leaders", pp.9~12 (2003), Donghyun
- Cho, Y.G., "Development of an evaluation model in public R&D programmes-conceptual approach", pp.1045~1051 (2005), korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
- Choi, J.W., "A study on the improvement of management outcomes in the start-up companies using AHP and DEA-Focusing on the tenant companies of business incubator center", 박사
- Choi, T.G., "Strategic Design of the Government R&D Management System based on the Analysis of Relationship between R&D Program Types and their Outputs"
- Ho, W., "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review", European Journal of Operational Research, 186, pp.211~228 (2008)
- Hsu, P.M., "Measuring realtive efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects : A three- stage approach", Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, pp.178~186 (2009)
- 장현덕, "AHP와 DEA 활용을 통한 효율적인 유망 기술 선정", 기업경영연구, 18(2), pp.67~85 (2011), 한국기업경영학회
- Jyoti, Banwet D.K., "Evaluating performance of national R&D organizations using integrated DEA-AHP technique", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57, pp.370~386 (2008)
- Kim, B.W., "An effective R&D performance measurement system : survey of Korean R&D researchers", Omega, 30, pp.19~31 (2002)
- Kim, H.B., "A Performance Indicator Roadmap Framework for evaluating Government R&D Programs", Proceeding of The Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers Spring Conference, pp.1~9 (2009)
- Kim, M.S., "Countstratgy Post catch-up in Mobile Phone industry", Korea Information Society Development Institute, 22, pp.1~16 (2010)
- Kim, M.S., "Internet shopping mall evaluation by AHP", DEA, Korea University, 2001
- Kim, S.H., "Analysis and Application of Decision making. 8th ed", pp.379~401 (2009), Youngchimunwhasa
- A Direction of Industrial Technology Policy for Open Innovation, "Kim, Y.G.", KIAT, ~, pp.Issue paper 2011-11 (2011)
- 이덕주, "DEA", AHP 모형을 이용한 R&D 프로젝트 선정모형 및 Web 기반 R&D 프로젝트 선정시스템 개발, 2006, pp.32(1), 18~28[DOI]
- Lee, J.J., "The Role of Government and The Strategy of Post Catch-up Science and Technology", Proceedings of Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference, pp.223~239 (2010)
- Lee, K.W., "Implication and Analysis of Application system and management of Pubic R&D Performance", Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning, 2, pp.3~7 (2012)
- Lin, M.I., "Applying integrated DEA", AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China, 2011, pp.209, 129~140
- Liu, J.S., "DEA and ranking with the network-based approach : a case of R&D performance", Omega, 38, pp.453~464 (2010)
- Ministry of Education, "Management Manual of R&D Performance in Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", Science and Technology, National Research Foundation of Korea, 50~51 (2009)
- Meng, W., "Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation", Omega, 36, pp.950~957 (2008)
- 박석종, "과학기술적 성과 관점에서 정부 R&D사업 효율성 분석에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 14(2), pp.205~222 (2011), 한국기술혁신학회
- 박성민, "복합성과평가지수를 활용한 정부지원 R&D 과제의 성과평가에 관한 연구*: 응용기술개발지원 융자사업을 중심으로", 대한경영학회지, 25(2), pp.1259~1281 (2012), 대한경영학회[DOI]
- 박성민, "R&D 프로젝트의 성과평가를 위한 DEA효율성지수와 정규화지표의 합치도 분석", 대한경영학회지, 24(4), pp.1999~2014 (2011), 대한경영학회
- 박성민, "R&D 프로젝트 효율성 상관분석 및 사업포지셔닝 조사를 위한 2단계 DEA", AR-I 성과평가모형, 2010, pp.23(6), 3285~3303[DOI]
- Rhim, H.S., "A DEA", AHP hybrid model for evaluation and selection of R&D projects, 1999, pp.24, 1~12
- Saaty, T.L., "How to Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, 48, pp.9~26 (1990)
- Shang, J., "A Unified Framework for the Selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System", European Journal of Operational Research, 85, pp.297~315 (1995)
- 손소영, "Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria", EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 30, pp.10~20 (2007)
- Wang, E.C., "Relative efficiency of R&D activities : A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach", Research Policy, 36, pp.260~273 (2007)
- Wang, Y.M., "An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment", Computers and Industrial Engineering, 54, pp.513~525 (2009)
- Yang, T., "A hierarchical AHP", DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem, 2003, pp.147, 128~136
- Yang, W.M., "A study on the selection methodology of R&D projects using DEA", AHP with ordinal factors, Kyung Hee University, 2003
- 2010 Technology Level Evaluation Report -95 Focued Science Technology-, "Yim, H.", KISTEP, ~, pp.2011-031 (2011)
- 윤진효, "특허기반 개방형 혁신 분석 모델 개발 및 적용 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 13(1), pp.99~123 (2010), 한국기술혁신학회
