본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생물다양성 평가기법의 국내외 연구동향 분석 및 환경영향평가 적용가능성에 대한 연구

A Study on the National and International Research Trend of Biodiversity Assessment method and Its Application of Environmental Impact Assessment

이동근|구미현
한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment)|2012.02|환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)|제21권 제1호|pp. 119-132

2

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

biodiversityenvironmental impact assessmentenvironmental assessment technique
주제분류환경공학

초록

Biodiversity is a key element of ecosystem of which function provides essential product and service in human life. In the course since development projects often causes damages to biodiversity, environmental impact assessment technique must be capable of accurately assessing potential impact from flora and fauna and to entire ecosystem. Korea needs improvement of its assessment technique that is compatible with Korean environmental regulatory standard that is generally stricter than that of most countries. This study attempts to explore both domestic and overseas biodiversity assessment techniques and analyze each stage of environmental impact assessment. The data is collected from numbers of literatures selected by navigating both domestic and overseas literature database with certain keywords. Among the 44 selected papers, overseas publications outnumber those of domestics, and there are more researches on assessment methodology of biodiversity than assessment tool and model. In terms of environmental impact assessment, the number of papers on environmental impact forecast exceeds the numbers of papers on current state of environment and the impact minimizing solution. Therefore, contents and trends of those researches in the different stages of environmental impact assessment discussed in this paper not only suggest potential impact on biodiversity and minimization solutions in detail, but is also a valuable resource particularly for biodiversity relevant environmental assessment technique improvement in Korea. Proposing of a new direction of improvement in biodiversity assessment techniques makes this study significant, and further research for preservation of biodiversity should follow up to provide an improvement scheme for biodiversity assessment techniques in the future

Abstract

Biodiversity is a key element of ecosystem of which function provides essential product and service in human life. In the course since development projects often causes damages to biodiversity, environmental impact assessment technique must be capable of accurately assessing potential impact from flora and fauna and to entire ecosystem. Korea needs improvement of its assessment technique that is compatible with Korean environmental regulatory standard that is generally stricter than that of most countries. This study attempts to explore both domestic and overseas biodiversity assessment techniques and analyze each stage of environmental impact assessment. The data is collected from numbers of literatures selected by navigating both domestic and overseas literature database with certain keywords. Among the 44 selected papers, overseas publications outnumber those of domestics, and there are more researches on assessment methodology of biodiversity than assessment tool and model. In terms of environmental impact assessment, the number of papers on environmental impact forecast exceeds the numbers of papers on current state of environment and the impact minimizing solution. Therefore, contents and trends of those researches in the different stages of environmental impact assessment discussed in this paper not only suggest potential impact on biodiversity and minimization solutions in detail, but is also a valuable resource particularly for biodiversity relevant environmental assessment technique improvement in Korea. Proposing of a new direction of improvement in biodiversity assessment techniques makes this study significant, and further research for preservation of biodiversity should follow up to provide an improvement scheme for biodiversity assessment techniques in the future

참고문헌 (55)

  1. 강신규, "산지복잡지형과 생태적 비균질성: 산지경관의 생산성과 수자원", 수질에 관한 생태계 서비스 평가, 2010, pp.12(4), 307~316[DOI]
  2. 환경평가에있어 생물다양성 항목의 도입방안, "권영한", 한국환경정책평가연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서, RE-18 (2006)
  3. 기동원, "현장 측정된 토양미생물 종 다양성과 생태자연도 등급 자료 간의 통계적 상관관계 평가와 토양생태의 질 산정방안 제안", 대한토목학회 논문집B, 27(6B), pp.703~710 (2007), 대한토목학회
  4. 김성훈, "환경영향평가를 위한생물다양성 분석의 표준화 연구", 대한토목학회 정기학술대회지, pp.3802~3805 (2007)
  5. 오정학, "경관생태학적 도시숲 관리를 위한 비오톱 평가지표 및유형 분류에 관한 연구", 한국지리정보학회지, 11(4), pp.101~111 (2008), 한국지리정보학회
  6. 여준호, "울진 금강소나무 군락지역보전에 대한 전문가집단의 지불의사분석", 한국산림휴양학회지, 11(2), pp.11~23 (2007)
  7. 정다정, "국가 생태정보를 활용한 생물다양성 지도 구축", 환경영향평가, 19(6), pp.573~581 (2010), 한국환경영향평가학회
  8. 정연만, "생물다양성과 영향평가", 한국환경영향평가학회 2010 춘계학술대회 발표집, pp.3~11 (2010)
  9. 경관생태학적 환경영향 평가기법에관한 연구, "정흥락", 한국환경정책평가연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서, RE-23 (2003)
  10. 환경부, "환경성과지수(EPI) 발표 한국94위", 보도자료, ~ (2010)
  11. Balfors, B, "Impacts of regionwide urban development on biodiversity in strategic environmental assessment", Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 9(4), pp.229~246 (2005)
  12. Benini, L, "Assessment of land use changes through an indicator-based approach: A case study from the Lamone river basin in Northern Italy", Ecological Indicators, 10(1), pp.4~14 (2010)
  13. Cardinale, B. J, "The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems", American Journal of Botany, 98(3), pp.572~592 (2011)
  14. Costanza, R, "The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital", Nature, 387, pp.253~260 (1997)
  15. Curran, M, "Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment", Environmental Science and Technology, 45(1), pp.70~79 (2011)
  16. De Lange, H. J, "Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment- A review and perspectives", Science of the Total Environment, 408(18), pp.3871~3879 (2010)
  17. De Nooij, R. J. W, "Validity and sensitivity of a model for assessment of impacts of river floodplain reconstruction on protected and endangered species", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(8), pp.677~695 (2006)
  18. Diaz, S, "Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being", Plos Biology, 4(8), pp.1300~1305 (2006)
  19. Erikstad, L, "Environmental value assessment in a multidisciplinary EIA setting", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(2), pp.131~143 (2008)
  20. Garcia-Montero, L. G, "Environmental screening tools for assessment of infrastructure plans based on biodiversity preservation and global warming (PEIT, Spain)", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(3), pp.158~168 (2010)
  21. Garver, G, "Transboundary environmental impact assessment as part of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(4), pp.253~263 (2008)
  22. Gasparatos, A, "Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications", Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 91(8), pp.1613~1622 (2010)
  23. Gibbons, P, "An operational method to assess impacts of land clearing on terrestrial biodiversity", Ecological Indicators, 9(1), pp.26~40 (2009)
  24. Gontier, M, "Biodiversity in environmentalassessment-current practice and tools forprediction", Environmental ImpactAssessment Review, 26(3), pp.268~286 (2006)
  25. Gontier, M, "Scale issues in the assessment of ecological impacts using a GIS-based habitat model-A case study for the Stockholm region", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), pp.440~459 (2007)
  26. Gontier, M, "Comparing GIS-based habitatmodels for applications in EIA and SEA", Environmental Impact AssessmentReview, 30(1), pp.8~18 (2010)
  27. Graham, S. P, "An overlooked hotspot? Rapid biodiversity assessment reveals a region of exceptional herpetofaunal richness in the southeastern United States", Southeastern Naturalist, 9(1), pp.19~34 (2010)
  28. Hacking, T., "A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom-Line, Integrated, and Sustainability Assessment", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(2), pp.73~89 (2008)
  29. Heink, U, "What criteria should be used to select biodiversity indicators?", Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(13), pp.3769~3797 (2010)
  30. Henry, P. Y, "Integrating ongoing biodiversity monitoring: Potential benefits and methods", Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(14), pp.3357~3382 (2008)
  31. Kim, K. C, "Biodiversity loss and the taxonomic bottleneck: Emerging biodiversity science", Ecological Research, 21(6), pp.794~810 (2006)
  32. Lamd, E. G, "Indices for monitoring biodiversity change: Are some more effective than others?", Ecological indicators, 9, pp.432~444 (2009)
  33. Liu, Y., "Application of an uncertainty analysis approach to strategic environmental assessment for urban planning", Environmental Science and Technology, 44(8), pp.3136~3141 (2010)
  34. Louette, G., "BioScore-Cost-effective assessment of policy impact on biodiversity using species sensitivity scores", Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(2), pp.142~148 (2010)
  35. Magee, T. K, "Index of alienimpact: A method for evaluating potential ecological impact of alien plant species", Environmental Management, 45(4), pp.759~778 (2010)
  36. Mandelik, Y, "Issues and dilemmas in ecologicalscoping: Scientific, procedural andeconomic perspectives", Impact Assessmentand Project Appraisal, 23(1), pp.55~63 (2005)
  37. Maxim, L, "An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework", Ecological Economics, 69(1), pp.12~23 (2009)
  38. McCluskey, D, "The promotion of environmental enhancement in Strategic Environmental Assessment", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(3), pp.344~351 (2011)
  39. MEA, "Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Multiscale Assessment, In Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series, 4" (2005), Island Press
  40. Middle, G, "A review of the use of environmental offset as a policy mechanism in the environmental impact assessment process (EIA) in Western Australia", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28(4), pp.313~322 (2010)
  41. Monavari, M, "Application of network method as a tool for integrating biodiversity values in Environmental Impact Assessment", Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 172(1), pp.145~156 (2011)
  42. Mortberg, U. M, "Landscape ecological assessment:A tool for integrating biodiversity issuesin strategic environmental assessmentand planning", Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 82(4), pp.457~470 (2007)
  43. Norton, D. A, "Biodiversity offsets: Two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework", Environmental Management, 43(4), pp.698~706 (2009)
  44. Pearson, R. G, "Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction", Journal of Biogeography, 33(10), pp.1704~1711 (2006)
  45. Pena, S. B, "A methodology for creating greenways through multidisciplinary sustainable landscape planning", Journal of Environmental Management, 91(4), pp.970~983 (2010)
  46. Potschin, M., "Land use and the state of the natural environment", Land Use Policy, 26(1), pp.170~177 (2009)
  47. Prato, T., "Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty", Land Use Policy, 24(1), pp.165~174 (2007)
  48. Rouget, M, "Getting the biodiversity intactness index right: The importance of habitat degradation data", Global Change Biology, 12(11), pp.2032~2036 (2006)
  49. Sandin, L., "Stream and river typologies-Major results and conclusions from the STAR project", Hydrobiologia, 566(1), pp.33~37 (2006)
  50. Schultz, L., "Enhancing ecosystem managementthrough social-ecological inventories: Lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike", Environmental Conservation, 34(2), pp.140~152 (2007)
  51. Smith, K. L, "When are historical data sufficient for making watershed- level stream fish management and conservation decisions?", Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135(1), pp.291~311 (2007)
  52. Thorne, J. H, "Evaluating aggregate terrestrial impacts of road construction projects for advanced regional mitigation", Environmental Management, 43(5), pp.936~948 (2009)
  53. Vihervaara, P, "Trends in Ecosystem Service Research: Early Steps and Current Drivers", AMBIO, 39, pp.314~324 (2010)
  54. Wilson, E. B, "Spatial planning for biodiversity in Europe’s changing climate", European Environment, 18(3), pp.135~151 (2008)
  55. Zhou, J, "Accounting for uncertainty in evaluating water quality impacts of urban development plan", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(4), pp.219~228 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

An Approach to Introduce Biodiversity Components for the EIA Systems in Korea권영한한국환경연구원 · 환경정책연구2008 · 제7권 제2호자연생태 전망평가체계 마련을 통한 환경영향평가 및 정책 활용방안 고찰이후승한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2023 · 제32권 제5호환경영향평가에서 조류 종풍부도 변화에 미치는 요인 고찰 연구김은섭, 문현빈, 이동근한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2024 · 제33권 제2호환경공간정보를 이용한 식생부문 환경영향평가 고도화 방안 연구성현찬, 이지연, 최유영한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2022 · 제40권 제1호개발사업에 의한 자연경관 영향 저감방안 중요도 분석에 관한 연구신민지, 신지훈한국농촌계획학회 · 농촌계획2019 · 제25권 제2호환경영향평가 토지환경 분야의 토지이용 평가항목 고찰 연구박상진, 이동근, 정슬기한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2021 · 제30권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)

해상풍력개발사업의 바다환경영향평가 개선방안엄기혁, 이대인, 유준, 김귀영, 전경암pp. 1-13사회환경분야 환경영향평가 개선방안임효숙, 신경희, 조공장pp. 15-24물리적 차단시설이 대청호 수질에 미치는 효과 분석정세웅, 박형석, 정동환, 이흥수pp. 25-39국가하천변 생태관광 네트워크 10선이상혁, 이관규pp. 41-51생태축제의 생태친화적 효과에 관한 비교 연구: 함평나비축제와 무주반딧불축제를 사례로송명규pp. 53-61
원문 보기