본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Usage-Based Colligational Analysis of Over from a Syntagmatic Dimension

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

During the past decades, studies on prepositional polysemy have been carried out mainly under a cognitive linguistic paradigm, applying either a schema-based network approach or a corpus-based contextual approach to semantic analysis. Lin and Hwang (2021a) try to merge the traditional cognitive theories and use theories of meaning, conducting a corpus-driven and usage- based study on the lexical construction of “above-across” over. This paper now aims to further this mode of research by adding grammatical information (colligation) to the overall construction of over. The findings suggest that “above-across” over is typically primed to be associated with intransitive MOTION verbs and singular definite PART or BARRIER nouns in constructing a ‘traversing’ meaning. Combing multifaceted lexico-grammatical information, the study also proposes that “above-across” over is typically primed to represent the most common and noticeable human-nature experiences or meanings observed and constructed by language users.

Abstract

During the past decades, studies on prepositional polysemy have been carried out mainly under a cognitive linguistic paradigm, applying either a schema-based network approach or a corpus-based contextual approach to semantic analysis. Lin and Hwang (2021a) try to merge the traditional cognitive theories and use theories of meaning, conducting a corpus-driven and usage- based study on the lexical construction of “above-across” over. This paper now aims to further this mode of research by adding grammatical information (colligation) to the overall construction of over. The findings suggest that “above-across” over is typically primed to be associated with intransitive MOTION verbs and singular definite PART or BARRIER nouns in constructing a ‘traversing’ meaning. Combing multifaceted lexico-grammatical information, the study also proposes that “above-across” over is typically primed to represent the most common and noticeable human-nature experiences or meanings observed and constructed by language users.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Bybee, John, "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis", pp.827~855 (2010), Oxford University Press
  2. Brugman, Claudia, "The Story of Over", MA, pp.1981
  3. Cuyckens, Hubert, "Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics:Selected Papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference(Vol. 177)" (2001), John Benjamins
  4. Dewell, Robert, "Over Again: Image-Schema Transformations in Semantic Analysis", Cognitive Linguistics, 5(4), pp.351~351-380. (1994)
  5. Evans, Vyvyan, "The Meaning of Time: Polysemy, the Lexicon and Conceptual Structure", Journal of Linguistics, 41(1), pp.33~75 (2005)
  6. Evans, Vyvyan, "Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
  7. Firth, John, "Papers in Linguistics, 1934 -1951" (1951), Oxford University Press
  8. Firth, John, "Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952-59", pp.168~205 (1968), Longman
  9. Francis, Grill, "Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair", pp.138~156 (1993), John Benjamins
  10. Gries, Stefan, "Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis", pp.57~99 (2006), De Gruyter Mouton
  11. Gries, Stefan, "Handbooks of Cognitive Linguistics", pp.472~490 (2015), De Gruyter Mouton
  12. Gries, Stefan, "New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 24", pp.57~75 (2008), John Benjamins
  13. Hoey, Michael, "Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language" (2005), Routledge
  14. Hunston, Susan, "Corpora in Applied Linguistics" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  15. Johnson, Mark, "The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason" (1987), University of Chicago Press
  16. Kempton, Willett, "The Folk Classification of Ceramics: A Study of Cognitive Prototypes" (1981), Academic Press
  17. Kreitzer, Anatol, "Multiple Levels of Schematization: A Study in the Conceptualization of Space", Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), pp.291~326 (1997)
  18. Labov, William, "New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English", pp.340~373 (1973), Georgetown University Press
  19. Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), University of Chicago press
  20. Lin, Cheng, "Over and Above Over: A Usage-Based Construction of Polysemous Over", Ph.D, pp.2021
  21. Lin, Cheng(임정), "A Usage-based Syntagmatic Construction of Over", 새한영어영문학, 63(2), pp.159~182 (2021), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
  22. Cheng Lin, "A Usage-based Paradigmatic Construction of Over", 영미어문학, (141), pp.243~276 (2021), 한국영미어문학회
  23. Quirk, Randolph, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  24. Römer, Ute, "Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts and Didactics" (2005), John Benjamins Publishing
  25. Rosch, Eleanor, "Natural Categories", Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), pp.328~350 (1973)
  26. Rosch, Eleanor, "Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), pp.192~233 (1975)
  27. Rosch, Eleanor, "Basic Objects in Natural Categories", Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), pp.382~439 (1976)
  28. Sandra, Dominiek, "Network Analyses of Prepositional Meaning:Mirroring Whose Mind: The Linguist’s or the Language User’s?", Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), pp.89~130 (1995)
  29. Sinclair, John, "Corpus, Concordance, Collocation" (1991), Oxford University Press
  30. Sinclair, John, "Contrastive Lexical Semantics", pp.1~24 (1999), John Benjamins
  31. Stubbs, Michael, "Text and Corpus Analysis" (1996), Blackwell
  32. Taylor, John, "Polysemy’s Paradoxes", Language Sciences, 25(6), pp.637~655 (2003)
  33. Tognini-Bonelli, Elena, "Corpus Linguistics at Work" (2001), John Benjamins
  34. Tyler, Andrea, "Reconsidering Prepositional Polysemy Networks:The Case of Over", Language, 77(4), pp.724~765 (2001)
  35. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "Philosophical Investigations" (1986), Basil Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)