다의어와 다면어의 변별 기준과 의미 특성
Discriminating Criteria of Polysemous and Multi-Faceted Words and Their Properties of Meaning.
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine the discriminating criteria of polysemous words and multi-faceted words and their semantic properties from the perspective of the prototype theory in the frame of cognitive semantics. The results are as follows. First, it is necessary to set up a multi-faceted word between a monosemous word and a polysemous word, although the discontinuity of the form and meaning of a lexical item has been regarded in terms of monosemous, polysemous, and homonymous words. Second, polysemous words have a variety of meanings derived from the basic meanings of the lexical items, and multi-faceted words have semantic unity in which facets of lexical items complement each other. Third, polysemous words and multi-faceted words are distinguished from each other according to meaning extension, semantic asymmetry, conceptual unification, and their semantic class. Fourth, multi-faceted words have autonomous and semantic properties distinguished from polysemous words according to their perspectives. To sum up, it is important to establish multi-faceted words in the description of words, in lexicography, and in the teaching of meaning, since they demonstrate greater flexibility and explanatory power than the dichotomy of monosemous and polysemous words
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the discriminating criteria of polysemous words and multi-faceted words and their semantic properties from the perspective of the prototype theory in the frame of cognitive semantics. The results are as follows. First, it is necessary to set up a multi-faceted word between a monosemous word and a polysemous word, although the discontinuity of the form and meaning of a lexical item has been regarded in terms of monosemous, polysemous, and homonymous words. Second, polysemous words have a variety of meanings derived from the basic meanings of the lexical items, and multi-faceted words have semantic unity in which facets of lexical items complement each other. Third, polysemous words and multi-faceted words are distinguished from each other according to meaning extension, semantic asymmetry, conceptual unification, and their semantic class. Fourth, multi-faceted words have autonomous and semantic properties distinguished from polysemous words according to their perspectives. To sum up, it is important to establish multi-faceted words in the description of words, in lexicography, and in the teaching of meaning, since they demonstrate greater flexibility and explanatory power than the dichotomy of monosemous and polysemous words
참고문헌 (42)
- 강범모, "생성어휘부 이론의 다의어 기술 방법과 그 적용: 동사 ‘사다’와 ‘팔다’", 어학연구, 38(1), pp.275~294 (2002), 언어교육원
- 권도경, "國語 語彙의 多義性 硏究", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2005
- 박동호, "다의어 분할의 원칙: 세종 체언 전자사전의 경우", 한국사전학, 1, pp.137~184 (2003), 한국사전학회
- 박동호, "의미부류 체계의 구축과 적용", 어학연구, 39(1), pp.243~268 (2003), 서울대학교 어학연구소
- 박만규, "다의어의 의미 분할과 의미 부류", 한글, 257, pp.201~242 (2002), 한글학회
- 배도용, "우리말 의미 확장 연구" (2002), 한국문화사
- 서경원, "영어 다의성 명사의 생성어휘론적 의미구조 기술", 박사, 영어영문학과, pp.2007
- 이익환, "현대의미론" (1984), 민음사
- 이익환, "의미론 개론" (1985), 한신문화사
- 이운영, "한국어 명사의 다의적 해석", 박사, 언어학과, pp.2004
- 임지룡, "다의어의 인지적 의미 특성", 언어학, 18, pp.229~261 (1996), 한국언어연구회
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "다의어의 비대칭 양상 연구", 언어과학연구, 15, pp.309~331 (1998), 언어과학회
- 임지룡, "다의어 ‘사다’ ‘팔다’의 인지의미론적 분석", 국어국문학, 129, pp.165~190 (2001), 국어국문학회
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "다의어의 판정과 의미 확장의 분류 기준", 한국어 의미학, 28, pp.193~226 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 조춘옥, "조선어어휘의미론" (2005), 사회과학출판사
- 차준경, "고유명사의 의미와 중의성 해소", 한국어학, 20, pp.265~286 (2003), 한국어학회
- 차준경, "국어 명사의 다의 현상 연구" (2009), 제이앤씨
- 연구보고서: 21세기 세종계획 전자사전 개발분과, "홍재성", 문화관광부·국립국어원, ~ (2001)
- Apresjan, J.D, "Regular Polysemy", Linguistics, 5(32), pp.142~ (1974)
- Behrens, L, "Structuring of Word MeaningⅡ: Aspects of Polysemy, In Lexicology Vol. 1", pp.319~337 (2002), Walter de Gruyter
- Cruse, D. A, "Polysemy and Related Phenomena from a Cognitive Linguistic Viewpoint, In Computational Lexical Semantics", pp.33~49 (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Cruse, D. A, "La Signification des Noms Propres de Pays en Anglais, In Les Mots de la Nation", pp.93~102 (1996), PUL
- Cruse, D. A, "Lexical ‘facets’: Between Monosemy and Polysemy, In Sprachspiel und Bedeutung", pp.25~36 (2000), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Cruse, D.A, "언어의 의미: 의미·화용론 개론" (2002), 태학사
- Cruse, D. A, "Aspects of the Micro-structure of Word Meanings, In Polysemy: Theoretical and Computional Approaches", pp.30~51 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Cruse, D. A, "Microsenses, Default Specificity and the Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary", Axiomathes, 12, pp.35~54 (2001)
- Croft, W, "인지언어학" (2010), 박이정
- Cuyckens, H, "Introduction, In Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics", Amsterdam: Selected Papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference 1997, pp.ix~xxvii (2001), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- 김동환, "인지언어학 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
- Jackson, H, "Words and Their Meaning" (1988), Longman
- Kempson, R.M, "Ambiguity and Word Meaning, In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolf Quirk", pp.7~16 (1980), Longman
- Kleiber, G, "Cognition, Sémantique et Facettes: une ‘histoire’ de Livers et de Romans, In Les Formes du Sens", pp.219~231 (1997), Duculot
- Lewandowska-Tomasczczyk, B, "Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial Categories, In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics", pp.139~169 (2007), Oxford University Press
- 임지룡, "의미론의 이해" (2010), 한국문화사
- Nerlich, B, "Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Pustejovsky, J, "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
- Pustejovsky, J, "Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy" (1996), Clarendon Press
- Ravin, Y, "Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Taylor, J.R, "인지문법" (2005), 한국문화사
- Taylor, J. R, "Polysemy and the Lexicon, In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives", pp.51~80 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter