본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지문먼저 읽기와 문제먼저 읽기 전략 차이가 읽기시험 수행에 미치는 영향

The Influence of a Strategy Difference, Reading Passages or Questions First, on Reading Test Performance.

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study examined which sequence was more helpful to performance on a reading test: Reading passages or the questions first. A total of 147 high school students divided into two groups participated in the study. Each group took a different version of the test: Version 1 had passages first; Version 2 had questions first. Data were analyzed using MANCOVA. The mean reading performances were not significantly different between the two version groups. These results held true for both lower- and upper- proficiency groups. Thus, the issue of whether one reads passages first or questions first turned out not to matter. Whether test-takers read passages or questions first, in terms of their approach to actually solving the problems, they alternated passage reading and question reading. These results suggest two: (1) claiming an advantage of one strategy over the other would be inappropriate due to the unique nature of reading (i.e., referring back); (2) students and teachers would do well not to rely on strict sequencing strategies, which might be misleading.

Abstract

This study examined which sequence was more helpful to performance on a reading test: Reading passages or the questions first. A total of 147 high school students divided into two groups participated in the study. Each group took a different version of the test: Version 1 had passages first; Version 2 had questions first. Data were analyzed using MANCOVA. The mean reading performances were not significantly different between the two version groups. These results held true for both lower- and upper- proficiency groups. Thus, the issue of whether one reads passages first or questions first turned out not to matter. Whether test-takers read passages or questions first, in terms of their approach to actually solving the problems, they alternated passage reading and question reading. These results suggest two: (1) claiming an advantage of one strategy over the other would be inappropriate due to the unique nature of reading (i.e., referring back); (2) students and teachers would do well not to rely on strict sequencing strategies, which might be misleading.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김재영, "Teacher Preference on Strategy Use in Reading and Listening Tests: Reading Alternatives First or Not, Doctoral course project for a course entitled “ELT Research Methods” conducted by Jungok Bae" (2010), Kyung pook University
  2. 문채영, "Effects of input format types on Korean college English learners' performance and strategy use in a web-based listening test", 박사, pp.2010
  3. 최연희, "영어읽기 교육론 원리와 적용" (2006), 한국문화사
  4. Bae, J, "A Latent Variable Approach to Listening and Reading: Testing Factorial Invariance across Two Groups of Children in the Korean", English Two-Way Immersion Program, 1998, pp.15, 380~414
  5. Brown, H. D, "Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd. ed.)" (2007), Pearson Longman
  6. Brown, J. D, "Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practice" (2004), Pearson Longman
  7. Buck, G, "The Test of Listening Comprehension: An Introspective Study", Language Testing, 8(1), pp.67~91 (1991)
  8. Buck, G, "Listening Comprehension: Construct Validity and Trait Characteristics", Language Learning, 42, pp.313~357 (1992)
  9. Cohen, A. D, "On Taking Language Tests: What the Students Report", Language Testing, 1(1), pp.70~81 (1984)
  10. Goodman, K. S, "Reading: A Ppsycholinguistic Guessing Game, In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading", pp.497~508 (1970), International Reading Association
  11. Goodman, K. S, "The Reading Process, In Language and Literacy: The Selected Writings of Kenneth Goodma", pp.5~16 (1975), Routledge and Kegan Paul
  12. Grabe, W, "Research on Teaching Reading", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, pp.44~69 (2004)
  13. Shang, H. F, "Exploring the Relationship between EFL Proficiency Level and Reading Strategy Use", International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(3), pp.18~27 (2011)
  14. Joh, J. S, "How does Text Availability Affect Performance in EFL Reading Comprehension Tests?", English Teaching, 53(3), pp.199~216 (1998)
  15. Kinue, H, "Research on Test-taking Strategies in L2 Reading", 上越敎 育大學硏究紀要, 28, pp.157~165 (2009)
  16. Littlejohn, A, "Digging Deeper: Learners’ Disposition and Strategy Use, In Strategies in Language Learning and Teaching" (2008), SEAMEO Regional Language Centre
  17. McDonough, S, "Learner Strategies: An Interview with Steven McDonough", ELT Journal, 60(1), pp.63~70 (2006)
  18. Nuttall, C, "Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language (2nd ed.)" (2006), Heinemann
  19. Plonsky, L, "The Effectiveness of Second Language Strategy Instruction: A Meta-analysis", Language Learning, 61, pp.993~1038 (2011)
  20. Pritchard, R, "The Effects of Cultural Schemata on Reading Processing strategies", Reading Research Quarterly, 25, pp.273~295 (1990)
  21. Ridgway, T, "Listening Strategies - I Beg Your Pardon?", ELT Journal, 54(2), pp.179~185 (2000)
  22. Sherman, J, "The Effect of Question Preview in Listening Comprehension Test", Language Testing, 14(2), pp.185~213 (1997)
  23. Song, M. Y, "Do Divisible Subskills Exist in Second Sanguage (L2) Comprehension? A Structural Equation Modeling Approach", Language Testing, 25, pp.435~464 (2008)
  24. Urquhart, S, "Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product, and Practice" (1998), Longman

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)