본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Does Test Taking Experience Make a Difference?: In Strategy Use and Test Scores

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of the study is to examine whether taking tests makes differences in test score and test-taking strategies while learners are taking a reading test. In particular, the study investigates which types of questions and test-taking strategies are improved by test experience. For the study, participants were seventy-one Korean university EFL students, out of whom thirty-seven had three simulated tests and thirty-four didn’t have before the test. Results of a ANOVA indicate that differences between two groups are made in reading test score and some test-taking strategies. In details, test-takers got higher scores, showing improvement in the types of main idea and detail questions. The analysis of data, also, revealed that test-takers made use of test-taking strategies more frequently along with a remarkable difference in frequent use of managing strategy, one of three test-taking strategies: reasoning, guessing, and managing strategies. Consequently, the study showed that test experience helps the students gain higher score in main ideas and detail information questions not in inference question. Also, out of three types of test-taking strategies only managing strategy was more frequently used by test-takers. The study suggests that experience in tests could contribute to developing managing strategy effectively in answering to reading questions within limited time, but it is less likely to lead test takers to employ reasoning and guessing strategies relevant to successful reading comprehension.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine whether taking tests makes differences in test score and test-taking strategies while learners are taking a reading test. In particular, the study investigates which types of questions and test-taking strategies are improved by test experience. For the study, participants were seventy-one Korean university EFL students, out of whom thirty-seven had three simulated tests and thirty-four didn’t have before the test. Results of a ANOVA indicate that differences between two groups are made in reading test score and some test-taking strategies. In details, test-takers got higher scores, showing improvement in the types of main idea and detail questions. The analysis of data, also, revealed that test-takers made use of test-taking strategies more frequently along with a remarkable difference in frequent use of managing strategy, one of three test-taking strategies: reasoning, guessing, and managing strategies. Consequently, the study showed that test experience helps the students gain higher score in main ideas and detail information questions not in inference question. Also, out of three types of test-taking strategies only managing strategy was more frequently used by test-takers. The study suggests that experience in tests could contribute to developing managing strategy effectively in answering to reading questions within limited time, but it is less likely to lead test takers to employ reasoning and guessing strategies relevant to successful reading comprehension.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Anderson, N., "Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing", The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), pp.460~472 (1991)
  2. Anderson, N., "An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test:Triangulation of data sources.Language", Language Testing, 8(1), pp.41~66 (1991)
  3. Barnett, M. A., "Reading through context:How real and perceived strategies use affects L2 comprehension", Modern Language Journal, 72, pp.150~162 (1988)
  4. Bernhardt, E., "Progress and procrastination in second language reading", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, pp.113~150 (2005)
  5. Block, E., "The comprehension strategies of second language readers", TESOL Quarterly, 20, pp.463~494 (1986)
  6. Block, E., "See how they read:Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers", TESOL Quarterly, 26, pp.319~342 (1992)
  7. Carrell, P. L., "Metacognitive awareness and second language reading", Modern Language Journal, 73, pp.121~134 (1989)
  8. Chamot, A. U., "Learning strategies in foreign language instruction", Foreign Language Annals, 22(10), pp.13~24 (1989)
  9. Cohen, A. D., "Exploring strategies in test-taker:Fine-tuning verbal reports from respondents In: Learner-directed assessment in ESL ,Does Test Taking Experience Make a Difference?:In Strategy Use and Test Scores", pp.127~150 (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum
  10. Dreyer, C., "Learning strategies and other predictors of FSL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa In: Language learning strategies around the world:Cross-Cultural Perspectives", pp.61~74 (1996), University of Hawaii Press
  11. Duffy, G., "Rethinking strategy instruction:Four teachers' development and their low achievers' understandings", Elementary Journal, 93, pp.231~247 (1993)
  12. Grabe, W., "Current development in second language reading research", TESOL Quarterly, 25, pp.375~406 (1991)
  13. Haam,Eunkyong, "The correlation between test-taking strategy use and reading comprehension test", English Teaching, 6(3), pp.3~28 (2006)
  14. Keiko, H., "Reading strategies and extensive reading in EFL class", RELC Journal, 30(2), pp.116~127 (1999)
  15. David B. Kim, "How “Guessing Meaning from Context” and “Making Inferences” Can Be Taught through Literature Teaching", 현대영어교육, 8(3), pp.20~33 (2008), 현대영어교육학회
  16. 김정렬, "추론 기능 지도가 수능 외국어 영역읽기 성취도에 미치는 영향", 현대영어교육, 9(1), pp.188~213 (2008), 현대영어교육학회
  17. Kim,Sungae, "Types of reading strategies used by Korean high school EFL student", English Teaching, 46, pp.239~267 (1993)
  18. Kirby, J., "Style,strategy,and skill in reading In: Learning strategies and learning styles", pp.229~274 (1988), Plenum Press
  19. Jeong-WonLee, "An Exploratory Study on Reading Comprehension Test-Taking Processes and Strategies in the EFL Context", 영어교육, 57(4), pp.177~195 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
  20. 이정원, "영어 읽기 시험-수행 전략 사용에 관한 사례 연구", 영어교육연구, 17(2), pp.179~201 (2005), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  21. Lee,Soyoung, "How is reading instruction practiced in high schools?", English Teaching, 56(4), pp.243~263 (2001)
  22. Oxford, R. L., "Language learning strategies" (1990), Heinle & Heinle
  23. Oxford, R. L., "Language learning strategies in a nutshell:Update and ESL suggestions In: Methodology in language teaching", pp.124~132 (2002), Cambridge University Press
  24. Phakiti, A., "A close look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance", Language Testing, 20(1), pp.26~56 (2003)
  25. Purpura, J., "Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high-and low-ability test takers: A structural equation modeling approach", Language Testing, 15(3), pp.333~379 (1998)
  26. Schoonen. R., "Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6,8 and 10", Language Learning, 48(1), pp.71~106 (1998)
  27. Shin,Il Jin, "Effects of English reading proficiency on the lexical inferencing of Korean middle school students(Unpublished)", Master, pp.2005
  28. Song, Mi-Jeong, "Reading strategies and second language reading ability:The magnitude of the relationship", English Teaching, 54(3), pp.73~95 (1999)
  29. Wallace, C., "Reading In: The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages", pp.21~27 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  30. Yamashita, J., "Processes of taking a gap filing test:Comparison of skilled and less skilled EFL readers", Language Testing, 20(3), pp.267~293 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)