본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한강 주요 하천의 겨울철 조류상 변화 장기 모니터링: 기존 생물다양성과 계통적 생물다양성 평가 및 비교

Wintering Avifauna Change Long-term Monitoring in Major Watershed Tributaries in Han River: Fundamental and Phylogenetic Biodiversity Assessment and Comparison

홍미진|유정칠|최진환|이후승|윤성호
한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment)|2021.06|환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)|제30권 제3호|pp. 164-174

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Species DiversitySpecies Richness종 풍부도종 다양도계통적 다양도Phylogenetic Diversity
주제분류환경공학

초록

개체수와 종수에 기초한 기존 생물다양성 평가와 달리, 계통적 다양성 평가는 계통유전적 다양성 및생태적 다양성도 평가할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 서울특별시 철새보호구역으로 지정되어 다년간의 생태모니터링이 용이한 한강의 주요 하천인 중랑천, 청계천 및 안양천의 지난 9년간의 겨울철 조류상 장기 모니터링 결과를 이용하여 기존의 다양성 평가와 계통적 다양성 평가를 각각 수행한 뒤 각 결과가 내포하는 정보에 대해 고찰했다. 분석결과 중랑천과 안양천은 전반적으로 조류 개체수가 시계열적으로 감소한 반면 청계천은 개체수 변동이 없었다. 종 풍부도는 청계천에서 시간에 따라 소폭 상승한 반면, 중랑천과 안양천은연도별로 차이가 없었다. 기존 종 다양도는 안양천을 제외한 중랑천과 청계천에서 시간에 따라 증가했는데, 계통적 종 다양도는 청계천에서만 증가하는 추세를 보였다. 이러한 생물다양성 평가 지수의 변동은 각조사구역 내에서 발생한 공사 등의 인위적 요인에 의한 것으로 판단되며, 종 다양도와 계통적 종 다양도는같은 결과를 반영하지 않는다는 것을 보여준다. 따라서 본 연구는 생물다양성 평가에 있어 유전 및 생태적관점과 같은 다양한 시각에서 고려할 필요가 있음을 시사한다.

Abstract

Information on biodiversity plays an important role in conservation planning for ecosystem. As existing biodiversity indices are calculated and predicted only based on the number of individuals and species, it is difficult to explain aspects of genetic and ecological diversity. Phylogenetic diversity can indirectly evaluate ecological diversity as well as genetic diversity overlooked by existing biodiversity assessments. In this study, typical metrics of biodiversity (e.g., species diversity, species richness, etc.) and phylogenetic diversity were evaluated together using a long-term monitoring data of winter birds in Jungrang, Cheonggye and Anyang stream where are designated as Seoul migratory bird reserves. Then discussed the meaning of each assessmentresult. In Jungrang and Anyang stream, the number of individuals generally decreased overtime, whereas in Cheonggye stream, there was no significant change. In addition, species abundance increased over time slightly in Cheonggye stream, while there was no significant change in Jungrang and Anyang stream. Species diversity temporally increased in Jungrang and Cheonggye stream, excluding Anyang stream, but phylogenetic diversity showed a tendency to increase only in Cheonggye stream. These changes in the biodiversity assessment indices are thought to be due to anthropogenic disturbances such as construction that occurred within each site, and it was shown that species diversity and phylogenetic diversity do not always lead to the same assessment results. Therefore, this study suggests that biodiversity assessment needs to be considered from various contexts such as genetic and ecological perspectives.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Anderson MG, "Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl", pp.365~395 (1992), University of Minnesota Press
  2. Bibby CJ, "Bird census techniques" (2000), Academic Press
  3. Bonn A, "Capturing biodiversity : selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria", Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, pp.1083~1100 (2005)
  4. Cadotte MW, "Phylogenies in ecology: a guide to concepts and methods" (2016), Princeton University Press
  5. CBD, "COP 10 decision X", 2, the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi biodiversity targets, 2020
  6. Chao A, "Phylogenetic diversity measures based on Hill numbers", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B : Biological Sciences, 365(1558), pp.3599~3609 (2010)
  7. Clarke K, "A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists : variation in taxonomic distinctness", Marine Ecology Progress Series, 216, pp.265~278 (2001)
  8. Crozier R, "Preserving the information content of species : genetic diversity, phylogeny, and conservation worth", Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, pp.243~268 (1997)
  9. Davies TJ, "Phylogenetic diversity as a window into the evolutionary and biogeographic histories of present"day richness gradients for mammals", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B : Biological Sciences, 366(1576), pp.2414~2425 (2011)
  10. Davies TJ, "Quantifying biodiversity: does it matter what we measure?", pp.43~60 (2011), Springer-Verlag
  11. Devictor V, "Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity : the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world", Ecology Letters, 13(8), pp.1030~1040 (2010)
  12. Dugger BD, "Using river flow management to improve wetland habitat quality for waterfowl on the Mississippi River, USA", Wildfowl, 59, pp.62~74 (2009)
  13. Faith D, "Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity", Biological Conservation, 61(1), pp.1~10 (1992)
  14. Fleishman E, "Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning", Ecological Indicators, 6(3), pp.543~553 (2006)
  15. Flynn DF, "Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity ecosystem function relationships", Ecology, 92(8), pp.1573~1581 (2011)
  16. Gerhold P, "Phylogenetic structure of local communities predicts the size of the regional species pool", Journal of Ecology, 96(4), pp.709~712 (2008)
  17. Gotelli NJ, "Quantifying biodiversity : procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness", Ecology Letters, 4(4), pp.379~391 (2001)
  18. Greenwood PJ, "Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals", Animal Behaviour, 28(4), pp.1140~1162 (1980)
  19. Hackett SJ, "A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history", Science, 320(5884), pp.1763~1768 (2008)
  20. Huang M, "Functional and phylogenetic diversity explain different components of diversity effects on biomass production", Oikos, 129(8), pp.1185~1195 (2020)
  21. IPBES, "Summary for Policymarkers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services", 56~ (2019)
  22. Jost L, "Entropy and diversity", Oikos, 113(2), pp.363~375 (2006)
  23. Kang SH, "The aassessment of urban stream ecosystem for ecological management: on the case of Cheonggye-cheon", Philosophy, pp.2007
  24. Kembel SW, "Picante : R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology", Bioinformatics, 26(11), pp.1463~1464 (2010)
  25. Report on climate change forecast for Paris agreement in Seoul, "Korea Meteorological Administration", Korea Meteorological Administration, ~ (2017)
  26. An approach to introduce biodiversity components in the environmental assessment system in Korea, "Kwon Y", Korea Environment Institute, ~ (2006)
  27. Lawton JH, "Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest", Nature, 391(6662), pp.72~76 (1998)
  28. Leonard D, "The application of an indicator based on taxonomic distinctness for UK marine biodiversity assessments", Journal of Environmental Management, 78(1), pp.52~62 (2006)
  29. Magurran AE, "Biological diversity:frontiers in measurement and assessment" (2010), Oxford University Press
  30. Pavoine S, "Hierarchical partitioning of evolutionary and ecological patterns in the organization of phylogenetically"structured species assemblages : application to rockfish(genus : Sebastes)in the Southern California Bight", Ecology Letters, 12(9), pp.898~908 (2009)
  31. R Core Team, "R: A language and environment for statistical computing", ~ (2017)
  32. Ricklefs RE, "Clade extinction appears to balance species diversification in sister lineages of Afro-Oriental passerine birds", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(32), pp.11756~11761 (2014)
  33. Riffell SK, "Area and habitat relationships of birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows", Wetlands, 21(4), pp.492~507 (2001)
  34. Robertson GJ, "Winter philopatry in migratory waterfowl", Auk, 116(1), pp.20~34 (1999)
  35. Rodrigues A, "Phylogeny and conservation" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  36. Safi K, "Understanding global patterns of mammalian functional and phylogenetic diversity", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B : Biological Sciences, 366(1577), pp.2536~2544 (2011)
  37. Shannon CE, "The mathematical Theory of Communication" (1949), University of Illinois Press Urbana
  38. Voskamp A, "Global patterns in the divergence between phylogenetic diversity and species richness in terrestrial birds", Journal of Biogeography, 44(4), pp.709~721 (2017)
  39. Wilson KA, "Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data", Biological Conservation, 122(1), pp.99~112 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

계통학적 다양성을 이용한 설악산과 오대산국립공원 하천생태계 생물다양성 평가 및 적용강지현, 이혁제, 장지은, 최희규, 황순영한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2024 · 제42권 제4호한강의 어류종 모니터링을 위한 환경 DNA 메타바코딩의 유용성 검토김창배, 문민호, 안형은한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2024 · 제27권 제1호서울시의 조류다양성 증진을 위한 도시비오톱 특성 분석구태회, 채진확국토연구원 · 국토연구2004 · 제40권 생태계 네트워크 분석을 이용한 생물 군집의 구조와 기능에 대한 연구: 청계천을 사례로김용은, 이민영, 조기종한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2018 · 제36권 제3호동림저수지에서 월동조류 개체군의 시계열적 변화와 환경 요인김우열, 박종철한국습지학회 · 한국습지학회지2017 · 제19권 제2호김포한강신도시 주변 논 습지에 도래하는 월동 조류의 서식처 보전대책배양섭, 배정훈, 심성웅, 주영돈한국습지학회 · 한국습지학회지2024 · 제26권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

CFD 모델을 이용한 도시 재정비 사업에 의한 NOx 분포 변화 모의김연욱, 김지현, 곽경환, 도현석pp. 141-154환경영향평가의 훼손수목량 추정을 위한 드론영상 분석법과 방형구법의 정확성 비교박민규pp. 155-163시가화지역 공간상 위치분배와 폭염현상과의 관계성: 5개 광역시 사례강상준pp. 175-185
원문 보기