한국어 수용성 판단의 실험방법론 비교 연구
A Comparative Study of Acceptability Judgment Collection Methods in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the differences among three experimental methods that have been widely used in the areas of experimental syntax and psycholinguistics. Specifically, this study examined the differences among Likert Scale (LS), Magnitude Estimation (ME), and Thermometer Task (TT) that were applied to analyze the multiple accusative construction in Korean. In this study, a total of 104 participants were randomly assigned to the three experimental conditions and the data was analyzed with several statistical methods. The findings of this study showed that there were significant differences statistically among the three experimental methods. These results have implications for the experimental syntax.
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the differences among three experimental methods that have been widely used in the areas of experimental syntax and psycholinguistics. Specifically, this study examined the differences among Likert Scale (LS), Magnitude Estimation (ME), and Thermometer Task (TT) that were applied to analyze the multiple accusative construction in Korean. In this study, a total of 104 participants were randomly assigned to the three experimental conditions and the data was analyzed with several statistical methods. The findings of this study showed that there were significant differences statistically among the three experimental methods. These results have implications for the experimental syntax.
참고문헌 (47)
- 김영희, "한국어통사론의 모색" (1988), 탑 출판사
- 박병수, "On the double object constructions in Korean", 어학연구, 6(1), pp.91~113 (1981)
- 성광수, "타동성 목적어와 중목적어: 목적어 중출에 대한 재검", 어문논집, 22(1), pp.115~127 (1981), 안암어문학회
- 성기철, "격조사 ‘-를’의 의미", 한국어교육, 5, pp.31~50 (1994), 국제한국어교육학회
- 孫仁鎬, "국어 조사 ‘을", 를’의 연구, 啓明大學校 大學院, pp.국어국문, 1994
- 신현숙, "목적격 표지 {-를}의 의미연구", 언어, 7, pp.119~139 (1982)
- 양정석, "이중주어문”과 “이중목적어문”에 대하여", 연세어문학, 20, pp.255~318 (1987), 연세대학교 국어국문학과
- 연재훈, "한국어 구문 유형론" (2011), 태학사
- 우형식, "국어 타동구문 연구" (1996), 박이정
- 유형선, "한국어의 목적어", pp.299~331 (2001), 도서출판 월인
- 이선희, "국어의 조사와 의미역 – 조사 {-를}과 논항 실현을 중심으로-" (2004), 한국문화사
- 임홍빈, "한국어의 주제와 통사 분석" (2007), 서울대학교 출판부
- 조용준, "한국어 실험통사론의 모색: 대격중출구문에 대한 수용성 판단을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2015
- 홍재성, "현대 한국어 동사구문의 연구" (1987), 탑 출판사
- Bader, M., "Toward A Model of Grammaticality Judgments", Journal of Linguistics, 46, pp.273~330 (2010)
- Bard, E. G., "Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability", Language, 72, pp.32~68 (1996)
- Bloomfield, L., "Language" (1933), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Chomsky, N., "Syntactic Structures" (1957), The Hague
- Clifton, C., Jr., "Amnestying Superiority Violations: Processing Multiple Questions", Linguistic Inquiry, 27, pp.51~68 (2006)
- Cowart, W., "Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments" (1997), Sage Publications, Inc
- Fanselow, G., "Carrots - Perfect as Vegetables, But Please Not as a Main Dish", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.353~367 (2007)
- Featherston, S., "Data in Generative Grammar : the Stick and the Carrot", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.269~318 (2007)
- Featherston, S., "Was ist Linguistische Evidenz?" (2008), Shaker Verlag
- Ferreira, F., "Psycholinguistics, Formal Grammars, and Cognitive Science", Linguistic Review, 22, pp.365~380 (2005)
- Gibson, E., "Weak Quantitative Standards in Linguistics Research", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, pp.233~234 (2010)
- Gibson, E., "The Need for Quantitative Methods in Syntax and Semantics Research", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, pp.88~124 (2013)
- Gibson, E., "Using Mechanical Turk to Obtain and Analyze English Acceptability Judgments", Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, pp.509~524 (2011)
- Gordon, P., "Intuitive Knowledge of Linguistic Coreference", Cognition, 62, pp.325~370 (1997)
- Greenbaum, S., "Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation", Lingua, 31, pp.201~212 (1973)
- Grewendorf, G., "Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Reasoning in Generative Grammar. Theoretical", Linguistics, 33, pp.369~381 (2007)
- Hill, A. A., "Grammaticality", Word, 17, pp.1~10 (1961)
- Keller, F., "Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality", Doctor, pp.2000
- Langendoen, D. T., "Dative Questions : A Study of the Relation of Acceptability to Grammaticality of an English Sentence Type", Cognition, pp.451~478 (1973)
- Korean Linguistics 17, "Japanese", pp.2009, Phillips, C.
- 류병래, "Multiple Case Marking Constructions in Korean Revisited", 언어와 정보, 17(2), pp.1~27 (2013), 한국언어정보학회
- Shibatani, M., "Syntax and Semantics (vol. 5)" (1976), Academic Press
- Sim, C. -Y., "To Make a Case for All: Syntactic Structure, Semantic Interpretation and Case Morphology", Doctor, pp.2005
- Sprouse, J., "A Program for Experimental Syntax", Doctor, pp.2007
- Sprouse, J., "A Test of the Cognitive Assumptions of Magnitude Estimation : Commutativity Does Not Hold for Acceptability Judgments", Language, 87, pp.274~288 (2011)
- Sprouse, J., "Power in Acceptability Judgment Experiments and the Reliability of Data in Syntax", Ms, pp.2011
- Sprouse, J., "The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics" (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Sprouse, J., "The Empirical Status of Data in Syntax : A Reply to Gibson and Fedorenko", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), pp.222~228 (2013)
- Sprouse, J., "Assessing the Reliability of Journal Data in Syntax: Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010", Ms, pp.2010
- Sprouse, J., "A Comparison of Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments Using a Random Sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010", Lingua, 134, pp.219~248 (2013)
- Stevens, S. S., "On the Psychophysical Law", Psychological Review, 64, pp.153~181 (1957)
- Wasow, T., "Intuitions in Linguistic Argumentation", Lingua, 115, pp.1481~1496 (2005)
- Weskott, T., "On the Informativity of Different Measures of Linguistic Acceptability", Language, 87, pp.249~273 (2011)