한국어 수용성판단 자료의 학술지간 비교: ‘생성문법연구’와 ‘국어학’을 중심으로
A Comparison of Korean Acceptability Data in the Journals
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The reliability of linguists’ introspective judgments of sentence acceptability has often been called into question. In this study we compare the large-scale replication studies conducted for published acceptability judgments given in the journals Linguistic Inquiry (Sprous et al. 2013), Studies in Generative Grammar (Cho et al. 2019) and Kwukehak ‘Korean Linguistics’. We make two observations about these replication studies. First, we note that English acceptability judgments in Linguistic Inquiry may be more reliable than Korean judgments in the other two journals. Secondly, the convergence rates between informal and formal judgment tasks in the journal Kwukehak are higher than those in the Studies in Generative Grammar, although both journals display significantly lower convergence rates than the Linguistic Inquiry. Our results may suggest that the peer review of Korean judgments in these journals may be insufficient or other factors may be involved.
Abstract
The reliability of linguists’ introspective judgments of sentence acceptability has often been called into question. In this study we compare the large-scale replication studies conducted for published acceptability judgments given in the journals Linguistic Inquiry (Sprous et al. 2013), Studies in Generative Grammar (Cho et al. 2019) and Kwukehak ‘Korean Linguistics’. We make two observations about these replication studies. First, we note that English acceptability judgments in Linguistic Inquiry may be more reliable than Korean judgments in the other two journals. Secondly, the convergence rates between informal and formal judgment tasks in the journal Kwukehak are higher than those in the Studies in Generative Grammar, although both journals display significantly lower convergence rates than the Linguistic Inquiry. Our results may suggest that the peer review of Korean judgments in these journals may be insufficient or other factors may be involved.
참고문헌 (33)
- 안희돈, "한국어 수용성 판단에서의 형식적 방법과 비형식적 방법의 비교 - 이산형 측정 자료의 경우", 한말연구, (51), pp.57~86 (2019), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- Bard, Ellen G., "Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability", Language, 72, pp.32~68 (1996)
- Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, "The wolf in sheep’s clothing : against a new judgment-driven imperialism", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.319~333 (2007)
- Cho, Yongjoon, "Hankwue silhemthongsalonuy mosayk – taykyekcwungchulkwumwney tayhan swuyongseng phantanul cwungsimulo - (Korean experimental syntax: A case of acceptability judgments of Korean multiple accusative constructions)", Doctoral, pp.2015
- 조용준, "한국어 수용성 판단에서의 형식적 방법과 비형식적 방법의 비교(2)", 언어학 연구, (51), pp.129~160 (2019), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Chomsky, Noam, "Syntactic Structures" (1957), Mouton
- Cowart, Wayne, "Experimental Syntax : Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments" (1997), Sage
- Culicover, Peter W., "Control is not movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(3), pp.493~512 (2001)
- Dąbrowska, Ewa, "Naïve vs. expert intuitions: an empirical study of acceptability judgments", Linguistic Review, 27, pp.1~23 (2010)
- den Dikken, Marcel, "Data and grammar : means and individuals", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.335~352 (2007)
- Edelman, Simon, "seriously should we take minimalist syntax?", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, pp.60~61 (2003)
- Gibson, Edward, "Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, pp.233~234 (2010)
- Gibson, Edward, "The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1-2), pp.88~124 (2013)
- Gibson, Edward, "Quantitative methods in syntax", semantics research: a response to Sprouse and Almeida (in press), 2013, pp.28(3), 229~240
- Featherston, Sam, "Data in generative grammar : the stick and the carrot", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.269~318 (2007)
- Grewendorf, Günther, "Empirical evidence and theoretical reasoning in generative grammar", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.369~381 (2007)
- Häussler, Jana, "Hot topics surrounding acceptability judgment tasks", Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2016 (2017), University of Tübingen
- Juzek, Tom, "Acceptability judgement tasks and grammatical theory", Doctoral, pp.2016
- 김창섭, "조사 ‘이서’에 대하여", 國語學, (58), pp.3~27 (2010), 국어학회[DOI]
- Langsford, Steven, "Quantifying sentence acceptability measures:Reliability, bias, and variability", Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), pp.37~ (2018)[DOI]
- Linzen, Tal, "The reliability of acceptability judgments across languages", Glossa : a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), pp.100~ (2018)[DOI]
- Mahowald, Kyle, "SNAP judgments: A small N acceptability paradigm (SNAP) for linguistic acceptability judgments", Language, 92(3), pp.619~635 (2016)
- Marty, Paul, "The effect of three basic task features on the sensitivity of acceptability judgment tasks", Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 5(1), pp.72~ (2020)[DOI]
- Korean Linguistics, "Japanese", pp.2009, Phillips, Colin
- Phillips, Colin, "Linguistics and empirical evidence:reply to Edelman and Christiansen", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, pp.61~62 (2003)
- Rouder, Jeffrey N., "Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis", Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, pp.225~237 (2009)[DOI]
- Schütze, Carson T., "Acceptability ratings cannot be taken at face value", Ms, pp.2018
- 송상헌, "Measuring the Degree of Convergence between Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments for Korean", 언어, 42(4), pp.761~804 (2017), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Sprouse, Jon, "Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax", Journal of Linguistics, 48, pp.609~652 (2012)
- Sprouse, Jon, "The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics", pp.181~202 (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Sprouse, Jon, "Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments", Glossa, 2(1), pp.1~ (2017)[DOI]
- Sprouse, Jon, "A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010", Lingua, 134, pp.219~248 (2013)
- Wasow, Thomas, "Intuitions in linguistic argumentation", Lingua, 115(11), pp.1481~1496 (2005)