본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects of Internal Governance Mechanisms on Voluntary Disclosure

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Researches on the effects of internal governance mechanisms report contradictory results. Some researchers argue that internal governance mechanisms are able to reduce agency problems, but others assert that they are not effective and just spend firms’ resources. This study suggests that internal governance mechanisms may have different effects depending on managerial activities. Managers tend to comply with internal governance mechanisms in the managerial activities, such as disclosing activity, whose results are obvious and assessable because the consequences of their actions can be easily observed and evaluated by governance mechanisms. In the other hands, because it is difficult to evaluate whether managers’ actions are for shareholders’ value in ambiguous and non-assessable activities, managers eagerly entrenches themselves to protect their position and privilege. Therefore, internal governance mechanisms are more effective in obvious and assessable managerial activities than ambiguous and non-assessable ones. In this study, I investigated the effects of internal governance mechanisms on voluntary disclosure; the obvious and assessable activity. An empirical test was conducted on 331 Korean firms in 2017. This study found that the stronger internal governance structure, such as outside directors and stock option, the more a manager is likely to disclose the performance expectation or goal.

Abstract

Researches on the effects of internal governance mechanisms report contradictory results. Some researchers argue that internal governance mechanisms are able to reduce agency problems, but others assert that they are not effective and just spend firms’ resources. This study suggests that internal governance mechanisms may have different effects depending on managerial activities. Managers tend to comply with internal governance mechanisms in the managerial activities, such as disclosing activity, whose results are obvious and assessable because the consequences of their actions can be easily observed and evaluated by governance mechanisms. In the other hands, because it is difficult to evaluate whether managers’ actions are for shareholders’ value in ambiguous and non-assessable activities, managers eagerly entrenches themselves to protect their position and privilege. Therefore, internal governance mechanisms are more effective in obvious and assessable managerial activities than ambiguous and non-assessable ones. In this study, I investigated the effects of internal governance mechanisms on voluntary disclosure; the obvious and assessable activity. An empirical test was conducted on 331 Korean firms in 2017. This study found that the stronger internal governance structure, such as outside directors and stock option, the more a manager is likely to disclose the performance expectation or goal.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Abrahamson, E., "Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: An agency theory perspective", The Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), pp.1302~1334 (1994)
  2. Agrawal, A., "performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders", Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), pp.377~ (1996)
  3. Ahmadjian, C. L., "A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s japan", American Sociological Review, 70(3), pp.451~471 (2005)
  4. Albitar, K., "Firm Characteristics, Governance Attributes and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure:A Study of Jordanian Listed Companies", International Business Research, 8(3) (2015)
  5. Barclay, M. J., "Negotiated block trades and corporate control", Journal of Finance, 46(3), pp.861~878 (1991)
  6. Bhagat, S., "The non-correlation between board indpendence and long-term firm performance", Journal of Corporation Law, 27(2), pp.231~ (2002)
  7. Chang, S. J., "Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in korea: Intragroup-resource sharing and internal business transactions", Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), pp.429~448 (2000)
  8. Cho, D. S., "Outside directors, ownership structure and firm profitability in korea", Corporate Governance-an International Review, 15(2), pp.239~250 (2007)
  9. Chung, K. H., "A simple approximation of tobin's q", Financial Management, 23(3), pp.70~74 (1994)
  10. Coles, J. W., "Independence of the chairman and board composition: Firm choices and shareholder value", Journal of Management, 26(2), pp.195~214 (2000)
  11. Dalton, D. R., "Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance", Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), pp.269~ (1998)
  12. David, P., "Strategic investments in japanese corporations: Do foreign portfolio owners foster underinvestment or appropriate investment?", Strategic Management Journal, 27(6), pp.591~600 (2006)
  13. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Agency theory: An assessment and review", Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp.57~74 (1989)
  14. Elmagrhi, M., "Antecedents of voluntary corporate governance disclosure: a post-2007", 08 financial crisis evidence from the influential UK Combined Code, 2016, pp.16(3), 507~538
  15. Eng, L. L., "Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), pp.325~345 (2003)
  16. Fama, E. F., "Agency problems and the theory of the firm", The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), pp.288~307 (1980)
  17. Fama, E. F., "Separation of ownership and control", Journal of Law &Economics, 26(2), pp.301~326 (1983)
  18. Finkelstein, S., "Managerial activities: A missing link in managerial discretion theory", Strategic Organization, 5(3), pp.237~248 (2007)
  19. Fligstein, N., "Theoretical and comparative perspectives on corporate organization", Annual Review of Sociology, 21(1), pp.21~ (1995)
  20. Gordon, J. N., "The rise of independent directors in the united states, 1950-2005: Of shareholder value and stock market prices", Stanford Law Review, 59(6), pp.1465~1568 (2007)
  21. Hall, B. J., "Are ceos really paid like bureaucrats?", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), pp.653~691 (1998)
  22. Hermalin, B. E., "The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance", The Journal of the Financial Management Association, 20(4), pp.101~112 (1991)
  23. Jensen, M. C., "Performance pay and top-management incentives", Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), pp.225~264 (1990)
  24. Jensen, M. C., "Management compensation and the managerial labor market", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), pp.3~9 (1985)
  25. Johnson, J. L., "Boards of directors: A review and research agenda", Journal of Management, 22(3), pp.409~438 (1996)
  26. Kohn, A., "Why incentive plans cannot work", Harvard Business Review, 71(5), pp.54~63 (1993)
  27. Lewellen, W., "Executive compensation and executive incentive problems", Journal of Accounting & Economics, 9(3), pp.287~310 (1987)
  28. Locke, E. A., "Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), pp.157~189 (1968)[DOI]
  29. Mehran, H., "Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance", Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), pp.163~184 (1995)
  30. Park, C., "Corporate governance, regulatory changes, and corporate restructuring in Korea, 1993-2008", Journal of World Business, 43(1), pp.66~84 (2008)
  31. Peng, M. W., "Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions", Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), pp.453~471 (2004)
  32. Rosenstein, S., "Inside directors, board effectiveness, and shareholder wealth", Journal of Financial Economics, 44(2), pp.229~250 (1997)
  33. Rubach, M. J., "Comparative corporate governance: Competitive implications of an emerging convergence", Journal of World Business, 33(2), pp.167~ (1998)
  34. Verrecchia, R. E., "Essays on disclosure", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), pp.97~180 (2001)
  35. Wagner Iii, J. A., "Board composition and organizational performance: Two studies of insider", outsider effects, 1998, pp.35(5), 655~
  36. Walsh, J. P., "On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms", Academy of Management Review, 15(3), pp.421~458 (1990)
  37. Yermack, D., "Do corporations award ceo stock options effectively?", Journal of Financial Economics, 39(2-3), pp.237~269 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)