이질적 경관에서의 연결성 측정: 리뷰 및 적용
Measuring Connectivity in Heterogenous Landscapes: a Review and Application
1
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The loss of connectivity and fragmentation of forest landscapes are seriously hindering dispersal of many forest-dwelling species, which may be critical for their viability and conservation by decreasing habitat area and increasing distance among habitats. For understanding their environmental impacts, numerous spatial models exist to measure landscape connectivity. However, general relationships between functional connectivity and landscape structure are lacking, there is a need to develop landscape metrics that more accurately measure landscape connectivity in whole landscape and individual patches. We reviewed functional and structural definition of landscape connectivity, explained their mathematical connotations, and applied representative 13 indices in 3 districts of Seoul having fragmented forest patches with tits, the threshold distance was applied 500m by considering the dispersal of tits. Results of correlation and principal component analysis showed that connectivity indices could be divided by measurement methods whether they contain the area attribute with distance or not. Betweenness centrality(BC), a representative index measuring distance and distribution among patches, appreciated highly stepping stone forest patches, and difference of probability of connectivity(dPC), an index measuring including area information,estimated integrated connectivity of patches. Therefore, for evaluating landscape connectivity, it is need to consider not only general information of a region and species’ characteristics but also various measuring methods of landscape connectivity
Abstract
The loss of connectivity and fragmentation of forest landscapes are seriously hindering dispersal of many forest-dwelling species, which may be critical for their viability and conservation by decreasing habitat area and increasing distance among habitats. For understanding their environmental impacts, numerous spatial models exist to measure landscape connectivity. However, general relationships between functional connectivity and landscape structure are lacking, there is a need to develop landscape metrics that more accurately measure landscape connectivity in whole landscape and individual patches. We reviewed functional and structural definition of landscape connectivity, explained their mathematical connotations, and applied representative 13 indices in 3 districts of Seoul having fragmented forest patches with tits, the threshold distance was applied 500m by considering the dispersal of tits. Results of correlation and principal component analysis showed that connectivity indices could be divided by measurement methods whether they contain the area attribute with distance or not. Betweenness centrality(BC), a representative index measuring distance and distribution among patches, appreciated highly stepping stone forest patches, and difference of probability of connectivity(dPC), an index measuring including area information,estimated integrated connectivity of patches. Therefore, for evaluating landscape connectivity, it is need to consider not only general information of a region and species’ characteristics but also various measuring methods of landscape connectivity
참고문헌 (76)
- 김명수, "파편화된 서식처 복원을 위한 기초이론 고찰", 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 4, pp.52~61 (2001)
- 서울특별시, "2010 도시생태현황도 정비제작-2차년도", 서울특별시, ~ (2010)
- 송원경, "공간그래프 이론을 적용한 삵 서식지 네트워크 모형 개발", 박사, pp.2011
- 안동만, "환경친화적인 도시공원녹지계획 연구 - 생물서식처 연결성 향상을 위한 서울시 녹지조성 방안을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 31(1), pp.34~41 (2003), 한국조경학회
- 이동근, "삵의 서식지 적합성 평가를 위한 분석단위 설정 및 보전지역 선정 - 충청도 지역을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 36(5), pp.64~72 (2008), 한국조경학회
- 이인성, "도시녹지 평가를 위한 경관지수의 스케일 민감성 분석", 한국조경학회지, 36(2), pp.69~79 (2008), 한국조경학회
- 임신재, "활엽수림에 설치한 인공새집을 이용한 박새류의 번식 생태", 한국임학회지, 100(3), pp.397~401 (2011), 한국임학회
- 정용문, "대전시 녹지계획을 위한 연결성 분석에 대한 연구", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 5(6), pp.14~23 (2002), 한국환경복원기술학회
- Adriaensen, F, "The application of ‘leastcost’ modelling as a functional landscape model", Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, pp.233~247 (2003)
- Angold, P.G, "Biodiversity in urban habitat patches", Sci Total Environ, 360, pp.196~204 (2006)
- Baguette, M, "Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal", Landscape Ecology, 22, pp.1117~1129 (2007)
- Baranyi, G, "Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: Redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices", Ecological Indicators, 11, pp.1301~1310 (2011)
- Bélisle, M, "Measuring Landscape Connectivity: The Challenge of Behavioral Landscape Ecology", Ecology, 86, pp.1988~1995 (2005)
- Benton, T.G, "Farmland biodiversity: is habitatheterogeneity the key?", Trends EcolEvol, 18, pp.182~188 (2003)
- Broquet, T, "Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana)", Landscape Ecology, 21, pp.877~889 (2006)
- Bunn, A.G, "Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory", J Environ Manage, 59, pp.265~278 (2000)
- CastellOn, T.D, "An Experimental Test of Matrix Permeability and Corridor Use by an Endemic Understory Bird", Conservation Biology, 20, pp.135~145 (2006)
- Collinge, S.K, "A conceptual model of land conversion processes: predictions and evidence from a microlandscape experiment with grass insects", Oikos, 82, pp.66~84 (1998)
- Coulon, A, "Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach", Mol Ecol, 13, pp.2841~2850 (2004)
- Desrochers, A, "Integrating GIS and homing experiments to study avian movement costs", Landscape Ecology, 26, pp.47~58 (2011)
- Dingemanse, N.J, "Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major)", Proc Biol Sci, 270, pp.741~747 (2003)
- Driezen, K, "Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A casestudy using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus)", Ecological Modelling, 209, pp.314~322 (2007)
- Epps, C.W, "Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics", Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, pp.714~724 (2007)
- Fall, A, "Spatial Graphs: Principles and Applications for Habitat Connectivity", Ecosystems, 10, pp.448~461 (2007)
- Forester, J.D, "State-space models link elk movement patterns to landscape characteristics in Yellowstone National Park", Ecological Monographs, 77, pp.285~299 (2007)
- Forman, R.T.T, "Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology", Environmental Management, 8, pp.495~510 (1984)
- Freeman, L.C, "Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification", Social Networks, 1, pp.215~239 (1979)
- Gobeil, J.-F, "Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocations", Oikos, 98, pp.447~453 (2002)
- Goodwin, B.J, "Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable", Landscape Ecology, 18, pp.687~699 (2003)
- Gurrutxaga, M, "Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: A transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe)", Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, pp.310~320 (2011)
- Gustafson, E.J, "The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization", Ecology, 77, pp.94~107 (1996)
- Hanski, I, "Metapopulation dynamics", Nature, 396, pp.41~49 (1998)
- Hanski, I, "Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes", Oikos, 87, pp.209~219 (1999)
- Hanski, I, "Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology", Naturwissenschaften, 88, pp.372~381 (2001)
- James, P.M.A, "Reserve network design combining spatial graph theory and species’ spatial requirements", Geomatica, 59, pp.121~129 (2005)
- Kindlmann, P, "Connectivity measures: a review", Landscape Ecology, 23, pp.879~890 (2008)
- Krebs, J.R, "An Introduction th Behavioural Ecology" (1981), Blackwell Science Inc
- Kusak, J, "The permeability of highway in Gorski kotar (Croatia) for large mammals", European Journal of Wildlife Research, 55, pp.7~21 (2008)
- LaRue, M.A, "Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods", Ecological Modelling, 212, pp.372~381 (2008)
- Levins, R., "Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control", Bull. Entom. Soc. Amer, 15, pp.237~240 (1969)
- Lookingbill, T.R, "Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity", Ecological Applications, 20, pp.427~441 (2010)
- Matthysen, E, "Do sibling tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) disperse over similar distances and in similar directions?", Oecologia, 143, pp.301~307 (2005)
- Merriam, G, "Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern", Proceedings of the 1st international seminar on methodology in landscape ecological research and planning, pp.5~15 (1984), Roskilde Univ
- Minor, E.S, "A multiscale network analysis of protectedarea connectivity for mammals in the United States", Conserv Biol, 24, pp.1549~1558 (2010)
- Minor, E.S, "Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning", Ecological Applications, 17, pp.1771~1782 (2007)
- Moilanen, A., "Metapopulation dynamics: Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure", Ecology, 79, pp.2503~2515 (1998)
- O’Neill, R.V, "Indices of landscape pattern", Landscape Ecology, 1, pp.153~162 (1988)
- O’Brien, D, "Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory", Biological Conservation, 130, pp.70~83 (2006)
- Pascual-Hortal, L, "Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest plann·ng through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain)", European Journal of Forest Research, 127, pp.23~31 (2008)
- Pither, J, "An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity", Oikos, 83, pp.166~174 (1998)
- Pullinger, M.G, "Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information", Landscape Ecology, 25, pp.1547~1560 (2010)
- Ray, N, "Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: A GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability", Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, pp.2143~2165 (2002)
- Rayfield, B, "The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values", Landscape Ecology, 25, pp.519~532 (2009)
- Ricotta, C, "Quantitative comparison of the diversity of landscapes with actual vs. potential natural vegetation", Applied Vegetation Science, pp.157~162 (2000)
- Ricketts, T.H, "The matrix matters: Effective isolation in fragmented landscapes", The American Naturalist, 158, pp.87~99 (2001)
- Rustigian, H.L, "Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics", Landscape Ecology, 18, pp.65~81 (2003)
- Saura, S., "A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study", Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, pp.91~103 (2007)
- Saura, S., "Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses", Forest Ecology and Management, 262, pp.150~160 (2011)
- Schick, R.S, "Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions", Ecol Lett, 11, pp.1338~1350 (2008)
- Singleton, P.H, "Using weighted distance and least-cost corridor analysis to evaluate regional-scale large carnivore habitat connectivity in Washington", ICOET, 583~594 (2001)
- Singleton, P.H, "Landscape Permeability forLarge Carnivores in Washington: A Geographic Information System Weighted- Distance and Least-Cost Corridor Assessment, In Pacific Northewest Research Station" (2002), U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Szulkin, M., "Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a wild bird population", Proc Biol Sci, 275, pp.703~711 (2008)
- Taylor, P.D, "Connectivity is a element of landscape structure", Oikos, 68, pp.571~573 (1993)
- Tischendorf, L., "Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently", Landscape Ecology, 16, pp.235~254 (2001)
- Tischendorf, L, "How should we measure landscape connectivity?", Landscape Ecology, 15, pp.633~641 (2000)
- Tischendorf, L, "On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity", Oikos, 90, pp.7~19 (2000)
- Turner, M.G, "Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process", Annual review of ecology and systematics, 20, pp.171~197 (1989)
- Urban, D, "Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective", Ecology, 82, pp.1205~1218 (2001)
- Verbeylen, G., "Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape?", Landscape Ecology, 18, pp.791~805 (2003)
- Verheyen, K, "Metapopulation dynamics in changing landscapes: A new spatially realistic model for forest plants", Ecology, 82, pp.3302~3312 (2004)
- Verhulst, S, "Natal dispersal of great tits in apatchy environment", Ecology, 78, pp.864~872 (1997)
- Whitcomb, R.F, "Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the Eastern Deciduous Forest" (1981), Springer- Verlag
- Winfree, R., "Testing Simple Indices of Habitat Proximity", The American Naturalist, 165, pp.707~717 (2005)
- With, K.A., "Landscape connectivity andpopulation distributions in heterogeneousenvironments", Oikos, 78, pp.151~169 (1997)
- Zetterberg, A, "Making graph theory operationalfor landscape ecological assessments,planning, and design", Landscape andUrban Planning, 95, pp.181~191 (2010)
- Zozaya, E.L, "Recent fire history and connectivity patterns determine bird species distribution dynamics in landscapes dominated by land abandonment", Landscape Ecology, 27, pp.171~184 (2011)
