본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대도시 도심의 생태적 연결성 및 연결망 분석

Ecological Connectivity and Network Analysis of the Urban Center in a Metropolitan City

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

개발 과정에서 발생하는 생태공간의 단절과 파편화는 생물다양성의 위협 요소이다. 특히 개발 압력이 높은 도심은 생태공간이 부족하여 연결성이 매우 낮을 것이다. 이러한 문제는 대도시에서 더욱 두드러지게 나타나는 경향이 있다. 이를 해결하기 위해 개별 사업이나 도시관리 수준에서 생태적 연결성 현황을파악하고 개선하는 지속적인 노력이 필요하다. 그러나 대도시의 생태적 연결성 현황 파악과 개선에 대한 논의가 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 우리나라 대도시 서울, 부산, 대구, 인천, 광주, 대전, 울산의 도심이 가진 생태적 연결성을 평가하였다. 평가 결과 도심은 외곽이나 도시 전체와 비교해 연결성이 낮았다. 그리고 종분포모델 등 지역 특성을 반영하여 대전을 대상으로 수행한 생태적 연결망을 분석하여 1ha 이상 산림을 이어주는 최적 경로 510개를 도출하였다. 본 연구는 도시의 생태적 연결성 개선 목표 제시에 필요한정량적 수치와 생물다양성을 포함한 지역 특성에 따른 연결망을 도출한 사례로서 의미가 있다. 환경영향평가나 도시관리에서 생태적 연결성을 개선하는 방향을 제시하고 평가 체계를 구축하는 데 결과를 활용할 수있을 것으로 기대된다.

Abstract

The disconnection and fragmentation of ecological spaces that occur during the development process pose a significant threat to biodiversity. Urban center areas with high development pressure are particularly susceptible to low connectivity due to a scarcity of ecological space. This issue tends to be more pronounced in larger cities.To address this challenge, continuous efforts are needed to assess and improve the current state of ecological space connectivity at the level of individual projects and urban management. However, there is a lack of discussion regarding the analysis and improvement of ecological connectivity in metropolitan cities In line with this objective, this study evaluated the connectivity of ecological spaces in the city centers of Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, and Ulsan. The evaluation revealed that city centers exhibited lower connectivity of ecological spaces compared to their peripheries orthe overall city. In addition, in the ecological network analysis that reflected regional characteristics, such as the species distribution model conducted on Daejeon, 510 optimal paths connecting forests of more than 1ha were derived. This study is significant as an example of deriving an ecological network based on regional characteristics, including quantitative figures necessary for establishing goals to improve urban ecological connectivity and biodiversity. It is anticipated that the results can be utilized to propose directions for enhancing ecological connectivity in environmental impact assessments or urban management and to establish an evaluation framework.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Beninde J, "Biodiversity in cities needs space : a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation", Ecology letters, 18(6), pp.581~592 (2015)
  2. Bradley AP, "The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms", Pattern recognition, 30(7), pp.1145~1159 (1997)
  3. User’s manual on the Singapore index on cities’ biodiversity (also known as the City Biodiversity Index), "Chan L", National Parks Board, ~ (2014)
  4. Chan L, "Handbook on the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity (also known as the City Biodiversity Index), Montreal, CBD Technical Series", 98~ (2021)
  5. Darvishi A, "Assessment and spatial planning of landscape ecological connectivity for biodiversity management(Case study : Qazvin province)", Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 9(1), pp.15~29 (2020)
  6. Ersoy E, "Identifying multispecies connectivity corridors and the spatial pattern of the landscape", Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, pp.308~322 (2019)[DOI]
  7. Integrating Habitat Fragmentation Analysis into Transportation Planning Using the Effective Mesh Size Landscape Metric, "Girvetz EH", Road Ecology Center, ~ (2007)
  8. Heller NE, "Biodiversity management in the face of climate change : a review of 22 years of recommendations", Biological conservation, 42(1), pp.14~32 (2009)
  9. Hernandez PA, "Predicting species distributions in poorly-studied landscapes", Biodiversity and conservation, 17, pp.1353~1366 (2008)[DOI]
  10. Hilty J, "Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridors, Best practice protected area Guidelines Series", Best practice protected area Guidelines Series, 122~ (2020)
  11. Hostetler M, "Conserving urban biodiversity? Creating green infrastructure is only the first step", Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), pp.369~371 (2011)
  12. Jaeger JA, "Improving environmental impact assessment and road planning at the landscape scale, Handbook of road ecology", 32~42 (2015)
  13. 정응진, "Characteristics of forest road cut slopes affecting the movement of mammals in South Korea", Forest Science and Technology, 17(3), pp.155~161 (2021), 한국산림과학회[DOI]
  14. 강완모, "국내 육상경관 연결성의 정량적 분석 및 시각화", 한국지적정보학회지, 21(2), pp.198~207 (2019), 한국지적정보학회[DOI]
  15. Karenlampi PP, "Age distribution of trees in stationary forest system", Journal of Theoretical Biology, 270(1), pp.13~18 (2011)
  16. 김은섭, "유휴지를 활용한 최적의 도시 녹지 공간 탐색 - 녹지연결성과 열 환경 개선을 목적으로-", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 22(5), pp.45~56 (2019), 한국환경복원기술학회[DOI]
  17. 김지연, "전국단위의 포유류 생물다양성우수지역 분석 연구", 환경영향평가, 23(6), pp.453~465 (2014), 한국환경영향평가학회[DOI]
  18. Koen EL, "Landscape connectivity for wildlife : development and validation of multispecies linkage maps", Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(7), pp.626~633 (2014)
  19. Kong F, "Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation : Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling", Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(1-2), pp.16~27 (2010)
  20. Kor L, "Assessing habitat connectivity in environmental impact assessment : a case-study in the UK context", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(6), pp.495~506 (2022)
  21. Krosby M, "Ecological connectivity for a changing climate", Conservation Biology, 24(6), pp.1686~1689 (2010)
  22. Ministry of Environment, "Guidelines for the Establishment of Urban Ecological Axis", ~ (2008)
  23. Park S, "Spatial assessment of landscape ecological connectivity in different urban gradient", Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, pp.1~20 (2015)[DOI]
  24. Patterson C, "Lack of consideration of ecological connectivity in Canadian environmental impact assessment : Current practice and need for improvement", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(6), pp.481~494 (2022)
  25. Patterson C, "Treatment of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment : A global survey of current practices and common issues", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(6), pp.460~474 (2022)
  26. Phillips SJ, "Modeling of species distributions with Maxent : new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation", Ecography, 31(2), pp.161~175 (2008)
  27. Rudd H, "Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy : a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces", Restoration Ecology, 10(2), pp.368~375 (2002)
  28. Rudnick DA, "The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities", Issues in Ecology, (16), pp.1~23 (2012)
  29. 송원경, "고라니 서식지 분석을 위한 기계학습식 종분포모형 비교", 대한원격탐사학회지, 28(1), pp.171~180 (2012), 대한원격탐사학회
  30. Spanowicz AG, "Measuring landscape connectivity : On the importance of within-patch connectivity", Landscape Ecology, 34, pp.2261~2278 (2019)[DOI]
  31. Tarabon S, "Environmental impact assessment of development projects improved by merging species distribution and habitat connectivity modelling", Journal of environmental management, 241, pp.439~449 (2019)[DOI]
  32. Torres A, "Advancing the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment : Synthesis and next steps forward", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(6), pp.451~459 (2022)
  33. 윤은주, "생태축 제안을 위한 회로 이론 기초 연결성 평가", 환경영향평가, 28(3), pp.275~286 (2019), 한국환경영향평가학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)