본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국인 학습자의 비대격 동사 인식: 영어 성적에 따른 차이 분석

The processing of unaccusative verbs by Korean learners: An analysis of differences based on English proficiency

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study analyzes the syntactic complexity that Korean English learners experience in processing unaccusative verbs, focusing on subject animacy and verb alternation as sources of difficulty. The study examines how mismatches in animacy and thematic roles, as well as distinctions between alternating and non-alternating unaccusative verbs, affect learners’ sentence processing. 71 undergraduate students from Daegu participated in a self-paced reading experiment. They were divided into two groups based on TOEIC scores (above and below 850). The results showed that sentences with animate subjects and alternating unaccusative verbs caused higher reading times and increased confusion. High-proficiency learners were more sensitive to syntactic complexity, while lower-proficiency learners showed less response to subject animacy differences. This study highlights specific cognitive challenges faced by Korean learners and proposes implications for improving grammatical instruction.

Abstract

This study analyzes the syntactic complexity that Korean English learners experience in processing unaccusative verbs, focusing on subject animacy and verb alternation as sources of difficulty. The study examines how mismatches in animacy and thematic roles, as well as distinctions between alternating and non-alternating unaccusative verbs, affect learners’ sentence processing. 71 undergraduate students from Daegu participated in a self-paced reading experiment. They were divided into two groups based on TOEIC scores (above and below 850). The results showed that sentences with animate subjects and alternating unaccusative verbs caused higher reading times and increased confusion. High-proficiency learners were more sensitive to syntactic complexity, while lower-proficiency learners showed less response to subject animacy differences. This study highlights specific cognitive challenges faced by Korean learners and proposes implications for improving grammatical instruction.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Becker, M., "The acquisition of syntactic structure: Animacy and thematic alignment (Vol. 141)" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  2. Burzio, L., "Italian syntax: A government-binding approach" (1986), Reidel
  3. Clifton, C., "Reading and language processing", pp.94~118 (2013), Psychology Press
  4. Croft, W., "Approaches to language typology", pp.85~144 (1995), Clarendon Press
  5. Dekydtspotter, L., "Transitivity in the processing of intransitive clauses : A category-based prediction in low-intermediate learners of English", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), pp.527~552 (2017)
  6. Dowty, D., "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67(3), pp.547~619 (1991)
  7. Friedmann, N., "The leaf fell(the leaf) : The online processing of unaccusatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 39(3), pp.355~377 (2008)
  8. Givón, T., "Subject and topic", pp.149~188 (1976), Academic Press
  9. Koring, L., "The time course of argument reactivation revealed : Using the visual world paradigm", Cognition, 123(3), pp.361~379 (2012)
  10. Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface (Vol. 26)" (1994), MIT Press
  11. Master, P., "Active verbs with inanimate subjects in scientific prose", English for Specific Purposes, 10(1), pp.15~33 (1991)
  12. Nelson, P., "Animacy and intransitivity in sentence processing", Doctor, pp.2021
  13. Oshita, H., "The unaccusative trap in second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), pp.279~304 (2001)
  14. Pae, H. K., "Animacy effect and language specificity : Judgment of unaccusative verbs by Korean learners of English as a foreign language", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, pp.187~207 (2014)
  15. Perlmutter, D. M., "Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis", Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.157~190 (1978), Berkeley Linguistics Society
  16. Prat-Sala, M., "Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production : A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish", Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), pp.168~182 (2000)
  17. Staub, A., "The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), pp.550~569 (2007)
  18. Sorace, A., "Unaccusativity and auxiliary choice in non-native grammars of Italian and French : Asymmetries and predictable indeterminacy", Journal of French Language Studies, 3(1), pp.71~93 (1993)
  19. Vernice, M., "Animacy effects on the processing of intransitive verbs: An eye-tracking study", Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(7), pp.850~866 (2018)
  20. Yip, V., "Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English" (1995), John Benjamins
  21. Zobl, H., "Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition", pp.203~221 (1989), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)