A constraint-based analysis of relative clause extraposition
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to provide a constraint-based analysis of relative clause extraposition (hereafter RCE) with the help of 597 tokens from BYU-BNC and COCA. In corpus findings, indefiniteness of subject NP and passive voice are salient. The grammatical weight of relative clause is the heaviest, thus being a very likely trigger for the extraposition. Discourse-New-Old-RCE is the most frequent type, implying that discourse-old information tends to be delivered in extraposed clause. As well, the extraposition is assumed to be employed in order to maximize focus effect on main predicate. All these corpus findings are well described in the system of sign-based construction grammar which enables multiple constraints to be inherited into RCE construction through inheritance hierarchy. Head-Extra Construction leads nonlocal EXTRA feature to be percolated up to sentential node. Consequently, the extraposition comes in with the help of constraints from stative-v, decl-cl, re-cl, and hd-noun-extra-cx.
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a constraint-based analysis of relative clause extraposition (hereafter RCE) with the help of 597 tokens from BYU-BNC and COCA. In corpus findings, indefiniteness of subject NP and passive voice are salient. The grammatical weight of relative clause is the heaviest, thus being a very likely trigger for the extraposition. Discourse-New-Old-RCE is the most frequent type, implying that discourse-old information tends to be delivered in extraposed clause. As well, the extraposition is assumed to be employed in order to maximize focus effect on main predicate. All these corpus findings are well described in the system of sign-based construction grammar which enables multiple constraints to be inherited into RCE construction through inheritance hierarchy. Head-Extra Construction leads nonlocal EXTRA feature to be percolated up to sentential node. Consequently, the extraposition comes in with the help of constraints from stative-v, decl-cl, re-cl, and hd-noun-extra-cx.
참고문헌 (17)
- Abney, S. Paul., "The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect", Doctor, pp.1987
- Arnold, J. E., "Heaviness vs. newness:The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering", Language, 76(1), pp.28~55 (2000)
- Bishop, J., "Prosody and meaning (Interface explorations)", pp.239~270 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
- Boas, H. C., "Sign-based construction grammar" (2012), CSLI publications
- Francis, E. J., "Grammatical weight and relative clause extraposition in English", Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), pp.35~74 (2010)
- Francis, E. J., "Competing motivation in grammar and usage", pp.70~87 (2014), Oxford University Press
- Francis, E. J., "When relative clause extraposition is the right choice, it’s easier", Language and Cognition, 9(2), pp.332~370 (2017)
- Göbbel, E., "Extraposition of relative clauses : Phonological solutions", Lingua, 136, pp.77~102 (2013)
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge grammar of the English language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Kim, J. B., "Korean phrase structure grammar" (2004), Hankuk Publishing
- Kim, J.-B., "English syntax: An introduction" (2008), CSLI Publications
- Lee, S. H., "Factors at play in extraposing English relative clauses", Doctor, pp.2017
- Manninen, S., "Department of English in Lund: Working papers in linguistics 2" (2002), University of Lund
- Oh, M. R., "Phonetic realization of the suffix-suppressed accentual phrase in Korean", GESTS International Transaction on Speech Science and Engineering, pp.21~29 (2004)
- Platzack, C., "The syntax of relative clauses", pp.265~308 (2000), John Benjamins
- Sag, I. A., "Syntactic theory: A formal introduction" (2003), CSLI Publications
- Wasow, T., "Postverbal behavior" (2002), CSLI Publications
